Woman rams into car with Trump sticker.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/0...intentionally-rammed-into-car-police-say.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/0...intentionally-rammed-into-car-police-say.html
Peace loving lefty update
- Thread starter Stewey
- Start date
This is all Trump's fault. Somehow, some way. They'll simply claim 'Trump Anxiety Disorder' and be on their way (with a new prescription and a participation trophy).
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,555
- Reaction score
- 22,384
- Points
- 113
I'd roll out of the car,fall on the ground and call either of the top two ambulance chasing attorneys in town right after I called the police.
Most triggered libtards don't have a pot to piss in.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/06/antifa-protesters-accost-conservatives-charlie-kirk-and-candace-owens-at-philadelphia-cafe.html
And even more from the peace-loving, tolerant left.
And even more from the peace-loving, tolerant left.
Bushhhh. Wait sorry wrong republican
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
BLOAT
Bide your time and wait for it. Let them strike the first blow but meet force with overwhelming force. I am resigned to the fact that CWII is coming to the USA soon because the Neo-Socialists are building up to the idea that it is perfectly okay to murder the people who disagree with your political ideology.
Bide your time and wait for it. Let them strike the first blow but meet force with overwhelming force. I am resigned to the fact that CWII is coming to the USA soon because the Neo-Socialists are building up to the idea that it is perfectly okay to murder the people who disagree with your political ideology.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,448
- Reaction score
- 5,519
- Points
- 113
Was it a Kennedy?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
It's time to hold Democrats responsible for Chicago's violence
Most Americans are appalled to read that 63 people were shot in Chicago over the weekend, with 10 fatalities. The numbers are huge, downright massacre-level. News coverage says Chicago's hospital and emergency rooms are now crowd scenes. Here in California, we are appalled at the death toll among firemen and other public workers in California's massive wildfires, brought about by eco-wackos and their environmental mismanagement, which have killed 7. In Chicago, seven dead would be a good day.
What's going on?
All of these attacks are gang-related, according to this report, and are happening in the 6th, 10th, and 11th Districts, all led by Democrats. What a massive sludge of corruption and thuggery rests behind that.
They muscle voters to the polls for the Democrats, and anyone who rebels gets a beating. Gang leaders in turn make demands of politicians for protection from police and get flows of city funds from these same Democrats, generally as city subcontractors, calling it "jobs for youth" and "second chances" or something. The left benefits, so it gives the gangs what they want.
When is someone going to say something about how the Democrats have created this gang-hell bacchanal of murder, unknown in few places outside Caracas? This is Democrats' doing because Chicago's politicians are in bed with Chicago's gangs. It's also a worthy topic for a class-action lawsuit, for one. More important, it's got to become a campaign issue, not just in Chicago, but everywhere.
Hold them accountable. Democrats have made their deals with gangs, and this is what has become of the city.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ocrats_responsible_for_chicagos_violence.html
Most Americans are appalled to read that 63 people were shot in Chicago over the weekend, with 10 fatalities. The numbers are huge, downright massacre-level. News coverage says Chicago's hospital and emergency rooms are now crowd scenes. Here in California, we are appalled at the death toll among firemen and other public workers in California's massive wildfires, brought about by eco-wackos and their environmental mismanagement, which have killed 7. In Chicago, seven dead would be a good day.
What's going on?
All of these attacks are gang-related, according to this report, and are happening in the 6th, 10th, and 11th Districts, all led by Democrats. What a massive sludge of corruption and thuggery rests behind that.
They muscle voters to the polls for the Democrats, and anyone who rebels gets a beating. Gang leaders in turn make demands of politicians for protection from police and get flows of city funds from these same Democrats, generally as city subcontractors, calling it "jobs for youth" and "second chances" or something. The left benefits, so it gives the gangs what they want.
When is someone going to say something about how the Democrats have created this gang-hell bacchanal of murder, unknown in few places outside Caracas? This is Democrats' doing because Chicago's politicians are in bed with Chicago's gangs. It's also a worthy topic for a class-action lawsuit, for one. More important, it's got to become a campaign issue, not just in Chicago, but everywhere.
Hold them accountable. Democrats have made their deals with gangs, and this is what has become of the city.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ocrats_responsible_for_chicagos_violence.html
I've learned from some funeral director pages on FB that funeral directors in Chi-Town are unionized and make a ****-ton of money. Of course the average funeral cost is about double what it is here and, obviously, there are a lot of funerals. Downsides are that you're 1) living in Chicago, 2) paying IL taxes, and 3) winters are colder than Pittsburgh which I hate anyway.
All those shouting "white supremacy" that were actually white, and mostly likely all of them, should probably just off themselves and be done with it. Oh, wait, it only applies to those other whites?
Losers aren't getting a trophy and they can't deal with it. Remember those old bumper stickers "stop sniveling"? It applies in this case.
It's time to tell the truth that young men, being raised without fathers, is a real problem in this country.
To point that out would be racist.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Don't let them get away with anything!
Black Conservatives Speak Out Against NY Times Hiring ‘Racist,’ ‘Vulgar’ Sarah Jeong
The black leadership coalition Project 21 is speaking out against Sarah Jeong, the New York Time’s hire for its editorial board, calling her history of anti-white person slurs on social media “racist” and “vulgar” and the decision reveals “inconsistency” and “irresponsibility” in the media outlet’s handling of race issues.
“Ms. Jeong is the recipient of leftist privilege, which means that whatever she says can and will be forgiven no matter how vile or racist her actions may have been,” Project 21 Co-Chair Stacy Washington said.
“In response to the backlash over her addition to the New York Times editorial staff, the paper shared that they had discussions with her about the appropriateness of her tweets,” Washington said. “This is within their purview, but the double-standard is glaring.”
“Roseanne Barr was blacklisted for one tweet,” Washington said. “Even after she showed remorse and apologized profusely, there is no path of redemption for her.”
“In the freest nation on the planet, we are witnessing jackbooted political thuggery,” Washington said.
“Sarah Jeong’s comments are antithetical in an age when we should be moving beyond racism to embrace our greater American identity,” Project 21 member Rich Holt said in a statement distributed to the media. “This racist liberal engages in a divisive anti-white narrative that is just as damaging as black codes and segregation were in the past.”
“As Americans, we need to erase the hyphens that divide us and embrace our unity under the red, white and blue,” Holt said.
“Despite firing technology reporter Quinn Norton earlier this year within hours of revelations of racial posts, the paper now says it ‘stands by’ Jeong,” the Project 21 press release said.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover...tives-times-hiring-racist-vulgar-sarah-jeong/
Black Conservatives Speak Out Against NY Times Hiring ‘Racist,’ ‘Vulgar’ Sarah Jeong
The black leadership coalition Project 21 is speaking out against Sarah Jeong, the New York Time’s hire for its editorial board, calling her history of anti-white person slurs on social media “racist” and “vulgar” and the decision reveals “inconsistency” and “irresponsibility” in the media outlet’s handling of race issues.
“Ms. Jeong is the recipient of leftist privilege, which means that whatever she says can and will be forgiven no matter how vile or racist her actions may have been,” Project 21 Co-Chair Stacy Washington said.
“In response to the backlash over her addition to the New York Times editorial staff, the paper shared that they had discussions with her about the appropriateness of her tweets,” Washington said. “This is within their purview, but the double-standard is glaring.”
“Roseanne Barr was blacklisted for one tweet,” Washington said. “Even after she showed remorse and apologized profusely, there is no path of redemption for her.”
“In the freest nation on the planet, we are witnessing jackbooted political thuggery,” Washington said.
“Sarah Jeong’s comments are antithetical in an age when we should be moving beyond racism to embrace our greater American identity,” Project 21 member Rich Holt said in a statement distributed to the media. “This racist liberal engages in a divisive anti-white narrative that is just as damaging as black codes and segregation were in the past.”
“As Americans, we need to erase the hyphens that divide us and embrace our unity under the red, white and blue,” Holt said.
“Despite firing technology reporter Quinn Norton earlier this year within hours of revelations of racial posts, the paper now says it ‘stands by’ Jeong,” the Project 21 press release said.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover...tives-times-hiring-racist-vulgar-sarah-jeong/
Make no doubts about it, we are (and have been) in a civil war. The bloodshed to date has been minimal but the agenda has been steadily ramping up over the years.
Dr. Jack Devere Minzey, born 6 October 1928 - died 8 April 2018, was the Department Head of Education at Eastern Michigan University as well as a prolific author of numerous books, most of which were on the topic of Education and the Government role therein.
(Editor's note)This was the last of his works:
Our Current Civil War -
Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can't settle the question through elections because they don't even agree that elections are how you decide who's in charge. That's the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country. When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a civil war.
The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it's not the first time they've done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn't really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There's a pattern here
What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don't accept the results of any election that they don't win. It means they don't believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections. That's a civil war.
There's no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government
This isn't dissent. It's not disagreement. You can hate the other party. You can think they're the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don't win, what you want is a dictatorship.
Your very own dictatorship.
The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it's inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can't scratch his own back without his say so, that's the civil war.
Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that's not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.
If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for illegal aliens. He can fine you for not having health insurance. He can use the IRS as his own police force and imprison citizens who speak against him. He can provide guns and money (Fast and Furious) (Iran nuclear deal) to other countries to support his own agenda, and watch while one of America's Ambassador's is dragged through the streets and murdered doing nothing to aid our citizens. His power is unlimited. He's a dictator.
But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can't do anything. He isn't even allowed to undo the illegal alien amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has 'discretion' to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn't even have the 'discretion' to reverse him. That's how the game is played That's how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn't yet won that particular fight.
When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren't even allowed to enforce immigration law. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own immigration laws. Under Obama, a state wasn't allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries. The Constitution has something to say about that.
Whether it's Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.
Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can't serve in if you're not a member. If you haven't been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren't in the club. And Trump isn't in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren't in the club with him.
Now we're seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down.
That's not a free country.
It's not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an 'insurance policy' against Trump winning the election. It's not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It's not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It's not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election because the guy who wasn't supposed to win did.
Have no doubt, we're in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a leftist Democrat professional government.
Dr. Jack Devere Minzey, born 6 October 1928 - died 8 April 2018, was the Department Head of Education at Eastern Michigan University as well as a prolific author of numerous books, most of which were on the topic of Education and the Government role therein.
(Editor's note)This was the last of his works:
Our Current Civil War -
Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can't settle the question through elections because they don't even agree that elections are how you decide who's in charge. That's the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country. When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a civil war.
The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it's not the first time they've done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn't really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There's a pattern here
What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don't accept the results of any election that they don't win. It means they don't believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections. That's a civil war.
There's no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government
This isn't dissent. It's not disagreement. You can hate the other party. You can think they're the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don't win, what you want is a dictatorship.
Your very own dictatorship.
The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it's inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can't scratch his own back without his say so, that's the civil war.
Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that's not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.
If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for illegal aliens. He can fine you for not having health insurance. He can use the IRS as his own police force and imprison citizens who speak against him. He can provide guns and money (Fast and Furious) (Iran nuclear deal) to other countries to support his own agenda, and watch while one of America's Ambassador's is dragged through the streets and murdered doing nothing to aid our citizens. His power is unlimited. He's a dictator.
But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can't do anything. He isn't even allowed to undo the illegal alien amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has 'discretion' to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn't even have the 'discretion' to reverse him. That's how the game is played That's how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn't yet won that particular fight.
When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren't even allowed to enforce immigration law. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own immigration laws. Under Obama, a state wasn't allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries. The Constitution has something to say about that.
Whether it's Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.
Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can't serve in if you're not a member. If you haven't been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren't in the club. And Trump isn't in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren't in the club with him.
Now we're seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down.
That's not a free country.
It's not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an 'insurance policy' against Trump winning the election. It's not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It's not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It's not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election because the guy who wasn't supposed to win did.
Have no doubt, we're in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a leftist Democrat professional government.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
https://www.newsweek.com/charlottesville-heather-heyers-cause-death-revealed-medical-report-686471
I guess you forget that 19 were injured and 1 died when white supremacist decided to drive over them in Charlottesville.
I guess you forget that 19 were injured and 1 died when white supremacist decided to drive over them in Charlottesville.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
I guess you forgot that they were blocking the street and rioting.
People making bad decisions usually end poorly. People making bad decisions happen thousands of times a day.
Ron Burgundy smiles, and says "Bad decisions are good for business!"
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,836
- Reaction score
- 4,780
- Points
- 113
I don't know if this is what happened in this case or not but when a mob of violent leftists are blocking the road and terrorizing people in their cars, beating on their cars with clubs, etc, like I've seen them do in other situations.....I can't muster up any sympathy for them when they get run over. Sorry. The people who hit the gas are probably in a panic and fearing for their safety. I think those people should make better decisions if they want to stay out of harms way.
If a bunch of Neo Nazi's ran over people on purpose because they don't like their skin color, then that is a whole different ballgame and they should rot in prison.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
The people he hit were standing in the street. There is video of the AntiFa Facists bashing cars just prior to the incident and there may be video of his car being attacked. The moral of the story is bad things happen to people that riot. She played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
At publishing time, Pelosi had announced that she would be increasing the frequency of the press conferences to three times a week in order to keep up with the millions upon millions of people the Republicans are continuing to kill every day.
I'll say it again.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,448
- Reaction score
- 5,519
- Points
- 113
Chicago is a great city despite the violence. Saying living there is a downside is like saying living in Fox Chapel is a downside because Homewood is only a few miles away.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
How elitist of you! Yes, the people of Elysium wonder what all the fuss is about..
Similar threads
