Trying to wrap my head around whether this bill is struggling because there actually are legitimate concerns with it or just more partisan politics.
I just read it, it not a long piece of legislation, and honestly can't see what the fuss is.
Admittedly I'm not a lawyer, but did have to know various laws and statues throughout my working career so I'm curious what the holdup is?
To those against this, why specifically? Not looking for "it suppresses voting" or other emotional takes, but specific parts of the bills wording that are an issue for you.
Why are Democrats, and Rino's, who say that they are of course in favor of only actual citizens voting in Federal elections not make suggestions to the bill pointing out language that they feel needs amended?
I'm going to send an email off to my 2 Democrat Senators asking them to list the line in the bill that they have issue with. Doubt I'll get a response.
I just read it, it not a long piece of legislation, and honestly can't see what the fuss is.
Admittedly I'm not a lawyer, but did have to know various laws and statues throughout my working career so I'm curious what the holdup is?
To those against this, why specifically? Not looking for "it suppresses voting" or other emotional takes, but specific parts of the bills wording that are an issue for you.
Why are Democrats, and Rino's, who say that they are of course in favor of only actual citizens voting in Federal elections not make suggestions to the bill pointing out language that they feel needs amended?
I'm going to send an email off to my 2 Democrat Senators asking them to list the line in the bill that they have issue with. Doubt I'll get a response.