I hope they load the room they need all the help they can get.
Edit - SteelerNation reported this 1 hour prior to you posting, but we used BTSC.
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope not I don't think the O-line did that well overall.Are the sticking with the oline coach? I would have to look up and see who our WR coach is
Frisman Jackson. Rumors were that Robinson was brought in last year because Jackson wouldn't set the tone in the room. smh. Either way, no big loss if they move on from him.Are the sticking with the oline coach? I would have to look up and see who our WR coach is
Ty. For some reason I was stuck on it being Ike hilliard still. But that was a few years agoFrisman Jackson. Rumors were that Robinson was brought in last year because Jackson wouldn't set the tone in the room. smh. Either way, no big loss if they move on from him.
I hope they load the room they need all the help they can get.
Hard to tell honestly. He had the same problems to deal with as the players, trying to make something out of pure ****. I give him an incomplete but with a few promising outings and a few bad ones. Lets see what happens with a cohesive plan and scheme. Now if we could lure Munch back give him the title of running game planner or something and let him teach the line and tutor the line coach.I hope not I don't think the O-line did that well overall.
While he's done some good work, it's only been for about 33% of the season. Two years in a row the line looked like trash for the first 10-12 games before they started to come together. No matter how bad Canada's scheme was, you'd at least expect the offensive line to execute it and not look totally lost out there as they did far too many times in pass protection.Hard to tell honestly. He had the same problems to deal with as the players, trying to make something out of pure ****. I give him an incomplete but with a few promising outings and a few bad ones. Lets see what happens with a cohesive plan and scheme. Now if we could lure Munch back give him the title of running game planner or something and let him teach the line and tutor the line coach.
Did they say what position they were interviewing him for? Tackle dummy maybe? He fits the second word in that job title.For anyone who cares, there has been a persistent rumor all day Sunday from raiders fans that sources are saying they are interviewing Canada Monday... Im not sure if its legit or not, but im guessing its BS since no bigger venue confirmed it
While he's done some good work, it's only been for about 33% of the season. Two years in a row the line looked like trash for the first 10-12 games before they started to come together. No matter how bad Canada's scheme was, you'd at least expect the offensive line to execute it and not look totally lost out there as they did far too many times in pass protection.
For how poor this offense has been for 3+ years, they need wholesale changes. They can't expect change by keeping things the same.
Good as the guy was a substandard coach.Per Gerry Dulac-Steelers parting ways with Frisman Jackson
This is basically 3 strikes in a row at that position... Drake gets and Incomplete, may he rest in peace, but they brought in Sherman as interim, then hilliard, then Jackson ...Per Gerry Dulac-Steelers parting ways with Frisman Jackson
Honestly Im not sure he returns here without some promotion.. i dont think he is under contract and someone probably will want him as a run game coordinator/rb coachFaulkner is the only coach on offense I’d keep.
I think the last one that had remote success was Richard Mann who decided to peace out.This is basically 3 strikes in a row at that position... Drake gets and Incomplete, may he rest in peace, but they brought in Sherman as interim, then hilliard, then Jackson ...
All three of them had tenure as NFL wr coaches and all three effectively failed