• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Steelers LB James Harrison Unsure If This Will Be His Final Season

This statement that keeps being expounded upon "Tomlin won with Cowher's players" is more of a crutch to opine a limited understanding of what coaching actually entails. Regardless of what players are available, the coaches job is to prepare these players so as to execute the game plan. That game plan is created based on players attributes and the best scheme they fit in to win individual match ups. Whether it's offense or defense. It's a matter of putting players in the best position to win.

A coach will get rid of a player who doesn't buy into or contribute to the scheme that is being used with their role. Noll did it (obviously), Shula did it on two teams, Lombardi, from which all coaches are measured against, definitely ran his ship with the Pack and later with Washington. We know about Cowher with Richardson and Stephens, and Tomlin has as well to an extent. Regardless of the times, it's still a function of the coach to formulate the team into a personality. The way the league is dictates that personality. Both Noll and Shula ran ball control offenses and tremendous defenses. UNTIL the rules changed and opened up offenses ability to scor. Beginning in 78, and caused a 180 degree of personality. Chuck won during both defensive and offensive personas, because he was a brilliant game planner. Shula did the same thing, albeit without a championship. But when Marino came aboard that prior defensive personality changed. During the Renaissance of the late 80's and 90's with free agency, teams could now pick a scheme to concentrate on. And because of free agency, their was no luxury to having both fantastic personnel on either side of the ball. Some went offense (SF, Dallas, Wash, Miami, Hou, Buffalo, etc.,) and some went defense (Pitt, Chicago, Philly ATL, NYG/NYJ). With the exception of Jimmy Johnson, most coaches starting their term (Walsh, Parcells, Ditka, Shottenhiemer, then Cowher, Fisher, Wyche, Parcells again) integrating some players from previous regimes.

Someone threw pics of George Siefert and Switzer as an analogy. Did Siefert win with Walsh's players? Yes, but Siefert coached them and won championships. Switzer is a poor example, because while he had Johnson's players, Jerry ran the operation as a puppeteer (as he does now) and Switzer was a figurehead. All of his coaching decisions went through Jerry's phone.

You can argue eras, rule changes, etc. even the advent of free agency in 1992 till you're blue in the face.

The fact remains that in this era if you take your claim and apply it hypothetically to one Mike Tomlin, and one Hue Jackson anyone who is honest with themselves will know the outcome.

So according to you all Tomlin has to do if he were to hypothetically become the coach of the Cleveland Browns next year is: prepare his players, teach them schemes, and put them in the best position to win.

Now how many of us here believe that in 2 or 3 years Tomlin would hoist the Lombardi alongside his Brown players and take part in a victory parade through Cleveland?

Let me tell you how many here believe that "SteelerS Nation Ike" ( SteelerS Nation is the name the steelers have adopted to knock this site down a few pegs. And they have, look at the google page rank between steelersnationunite.com vs. this site)

NO ONE HERE BELIEVES THAT! And that would be because Tomlin's early success here was because of COWHER'S PLAYERS.

It's not a "crutch" as you claim, it's a fact that either ( i'm guessing)because you are a current or former player, or you are a member of the Pittsburgh media who believes every crumb camp Rooney tosses your way you won't accept.

I say this because I notice you almost always post in defense of the organization, and because of your SteelerS Nation avatar.
 
You can argue eras, rule changes, etc. even the advent of free agency in 1992 till you're blue in the face.

The fact remains that in this era if you take your claim and apply it hypothetically to one Mike Tomlin, and one Hue Jackson anyone who is honest with themselves will know the outcome.

So according to you all Tomlin has to do if he were to hypothetically become the coach of the Cleveland Browns next year is: prepare his players, teach them schemes, and put them in the best position to win.

Now how many of us here believe that in 2 or 3 years Tomlin would hoist the Lombardi alongside his Brown players and take part in a victory parade through Cleveland?

Let me tell you how many here believe that "SteelerS Nation Ike" ( SteelerS Nation is the name the steelers have adopted to knock this site down a few pegs. And they have, look at the google page rank between steelersnationunite.com vs. this site)

NO ONE HERE BELIEVES THAT! And that would be because Tomlin's early success here was because of COWHER'S PLAYERS.

It's not a "crutch" as you claim, it's a fact that either ( i'm guessing)because you are a current or former player, or you are a member of the Pittsburgh media who believes every crumb camp Rooney tosses your way you won't accept.

I say this because I notice you almost always post in defense of the organization, and because of your SteelerS Nation avatar.

Who is arguing? I elucidated actual facts through the eras and how they have impacted pro football philosophy. You can dispute them as you have your own opinion. One thing remains the same, coaches coach, players play. How successful a coach becomes is based on the factors expressed in the previous post. A new hire is dealt the team given. Otherwise in your mentality every new hire would get rid of every player on the team and start from scratch. Coaching involves evaluating which players best fit the direction to win. Then putting them in a position to win games.

In reference to the body of your post, I respectfully agree to disagree. The fact you use Cleveland as a hypothetical scenario is laughable. To compare that organization in the last 16 years to Pittsburgh is apple and oranges. There is no lineage to even suggest any coach, including Tomlin, would be successful in 2-3 years. As it would take several years to turn that franchise into a competitive organization. Which ownership hasn't shown the patience to allow it.

So, to follow your criteria in this era, McCarthy won a championship with other coach's players. Kubiak won with another coach's players. Coughlin won with other coach's players. Dungy, Harbaugh, Carroll, etc.....regardless who was coaching, they made decisions, evaluated talent, schemed the players to win games. Not the previous coach.

That's a pretty broad brush you are painting "NO ONE". The fact this board allows differing views to be opined refutes your statement.

As for your prognostication of who I am, either a player, organization member, or part of the media.....if I were you, I wouldn't go to Vegas and "guess" anything.

As for the comments on the site, you are kidding yourself. The Steelers appreciate all the free publicity Justin's board is giving them.

As for what the Rooney's do? It's their club they own it. I don't have to defend their organization. They been successful and us fans appreciate it. We may not always like decisions they make, but I can guarantee, as has everyone else has, you've made decisions people don't like.

No ill will, and Happy New Year.




Sent from my iPad using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
Last edited:
If we go all the way and win it... I think James retires... maybe. :)

The guy has unbelievable drive.

That said... I hope we win it all... AND James comes back for another year, for another ring

.



Fixed it for yaz.............





Salute the nation
 
As for the comments on the site, you are kidding yourself. The Steelers appreciate all the free publicity Justin's board is giving them.
DD has "Steeler Nation" trademarked, so the team has to use "SteelerS Nation".
 
DD has "Steeler Nation" trademarked, so the team has to use "SteelerS Nation".

Yes and we all know in the 1970's the NFL films documentary on the Steelers uses the term "Steeler Nation".

The Steelers org. is trying to change it in the minds of the newer generation, and to something they can own.There is a clip of Tomlin walking to the tunnel at Heinz where he looks up and waves at the crowd while yelling out "SteelerS Nation".

You'll also hear the players using it in radio & tv interviews. It's a concerted effort......obviously.
 
If they win seven no doubt he retires. If they don't I bet he comes back one last year because he realizes how much talent is on the team and that they will improve next year. That's my take

PS.....Sported a Harrison jersey today
 
Top