- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Well, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg weighed in on the Electoral College at Stanford University on Monday, saying that she’s for tweaking the institution—but noted that it would be very difficult (via The Hill):
There are some things I would like to change, one is the Electoral College,” she said late Monday at Stanford Law School in California, according to CNN.
“But that would require a constitutional amendment, and amending our Constitution is powerfully hard to do,” she added.
You would think that a supreme court justice would appreciate the electoral college. That aside, is it appropriate for a supreme court justice saying publicly that their governing document needs to be changed? Seems very strange.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...pport-changing-the-electoral-college-n2282961
Last edited: