• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Enemy of the People Thread



Brings back memories of the medias war on SUV’s back in the 2000’s.

“The SUV crashed into blah blah blah….”
“The SUV lost control blah blah blah…”
“The SUV sped away blah blah blah…”
“The SUV is racist blah blah blah…”

The Early 2000s Activist Campaign
The intense public pushback against Sport Utility Vehicles peaked in the early 2000s. Critics, journalists, and environmental groups launched high-profile campaigns against large vehicles.
 
 
 
 

Not sure what the answer is here. The insane people doing this are literally destroying our system of jurisprudence by targeting those that they disagree with.
Who would want to serve of a jury knowing that you'll have your life, and those of your family destroyed in you don't step in line with the mob?

These people need to be slapped hard by the law, but we don't do that anymore.
 

It would appear that he lied on some paperwork and has an extensive history of domestic violence to the point there was an active restraining order against him during the trial that would have been disqualifying had he been honest on his paperwork.

While I applaud him for being the one sane voice in that jury room, it appears he’s not a saint. Who knows? Maybe he’s trying to right the wrongs he’s done previously. He has my respect for his work on that jury.
 
It would appear that he lied on some paperwork and has an extensive history of domestic violence to the point there was an active restraining order against him during the trial that would have been disqualifying had he been honest on his paperwork.

While I applaud him for being the one sane voice in that jury room, it appears he’s not a saint. Who knows? Maybe he’s trying to right the wrongs he’s done previously. He has my respect for his work on that jury.
Interesting that I'm not aware of any network trying to dig up dirt on any of the remaining 11 jurors.
 
Interesting that I'm not aware of any network trying to dig up dirt on any of the remaining 11 jurors.
I’m certain they aren’t. Only one guy was brave enough to go against the grain, therefore he must be destroyed.

If you’re searching for fairness, you’re not going to find it in the media.
 
i also wonder if any of that is legit.
i seriously do not trust anything.
 
i also wonder if any of that is legit.
i seriously do not trust anything.
That’s the whole point. If they can get you to a point where you trust nothing, they believe they can manipulate you to believe anything.
 
Not sure what the answer is here. The insane people doing this are literally destroying our system of jurisprudence by targeting those that they disagree with.
Who would want to serve of a jury knowing that you'll have your life, and those of your family destroyed in you don't step in line with the mob?

These people need to be slapped hard by the law, but we don't do that anymore.
I'm shocked that jurors are allowed to go on the talk show circuit flapping their gums after a case, especially when there has been a mistrial. With all the publicity and in-depth discussion of the jury deliberations, how on earth do you get an impartial jury for any re-trial? It was already difficult enough with the vocal misandrist sisterhood proclaiming her husband guilty. I know there are arguments for openness and transparency, but are you really going to get justice and correct verdicts, when jurors know their verdicts are going to be subject to being torn apart publicly for political purposes (and that's ignoring the fact so many people nowadays predetermine guilt/innocence based on skin colour, gender, gender identity and political leanings of the accused/victim)?
 
Last edited:
 
Top