• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The fix is about to be in - Homeland eyes taking charge of election

CharlesDavenport

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
9,583
Reaction score
5,866
Points
113
**** no. If we've learned anything this past 8 years it's that this administration is not shy about abusing it's power to get what it wants - and they always get away with it.

Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a "critical infrastructure," giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

"We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid," Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

Once dubbed "critical infrastructure", the President can **** with it all he wants..

A White House policy directive adds, "The federal government also has a responsibility to strengthen the security and resilience of its own critical infrastructure, for the continuity of national essential functions, and to organize itself to partner effectively with and add value to the security and resilience efforts of critical infrastructure owners and operators."

Not good.

From - http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/h...n-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592
 
Last edited:
Remember that billion plus rounds of small arms ammo DHS bought? Now you know why they needed it.
 
Back in the USSA


Federalizing schools
Federalizing police
Federalizing elections




Remember that billion plus rounds of small arms ammo DHS bought? Now you know why they needed it.

I see ammo back on the shelves, they must be stocked up
 
If they would just require that citizens show their ID before they vote then Hillary would be ******.
 
We request it down here and some States require it, I don't understand how the DOJ gets away with stopping it.

Most states still request some form of ID but don't require it. Another 20 states don't require identification.

imrs.php
 
Yep, good old California - no identification of any type needed. Just state your name and residence address.

If you have access to a phone book, you can vote dozens of times.
 
This action guarantees a Clinton win.
 
Top