I wasn't even aware of that, Vinnie. That's downright criminal.
The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
Hmm, Vinnie may be too Eye-talian sounding. And Vincenzo, I assume that's not preferred.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,371
- Reaction score
- 1,771
- Points
- 113
Ironic, ain't it.
Burgundy once said something about being Swedish, so I had to say the same thing about Swedes. Y'know, being a bigot and all, need to stay in practice.
Meh, that's all they have to hang their hats on anymore (libs). Not even worth the energy IMO. It'll blow over and they'll find something new to be outraged over soon.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 3,599
- Reaction score
- 1,148
- Points
- 113
That ******* racist!
Trump Endorses Black Conservative Danie Cameron for Kentucky AG
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...daniel-cameron-for-kentucky-attorney-general/
Trump Endorses Black Conservative Danie Cameron for Kentucky AG
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...daniel-cameron-for-kentucky-attorney-general/
Guy I used to work with posted this on his FB timeline:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/a...tard-shows-why-espn-cant-ban-politics/594820/
I responded:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/a...tard-shows-why-espn-cant-ban-politics/594820/
I responded:
Well said, if there was a response I'm sure it was that you're a homophobic racist.
Sent from my VS988 using Steeler Nation mobile app
More irony in Baltimore's Patterson Park
Folks...ya just couldn't make this **** up any more ridiculous than it is......and sad, let's not forget sad.
Folks...ya just couldn't make this **** up any more ridiculous than it is......and sad, let's not forget sad.
Yeah, I saw that. Maybe Baltisore should hire EdReed4Prez to supervise the gangbangers and send them out in squads to kill rats.
Win-win.
AFRICAN AMERICAN FAITH LEADERS DEFEND TRUMP AFTER WHITE HOUSE MEETING: 'HE'S NOT A RACIST'
Why doesn't CNN ever have these folks on I wonder?
https://www.foxnews.com/faith-values/trump-pastors-african-american-leaders-not-racist-photo-op
Why doesn't CNN ever have these folks on I wonder?
https://www.foxnews.com/faith-values/trump-pastors-african-american-leaders-not-racist-photo-op
Last edited:
Now: Pointing out the rat infestation and crime in the inner city is racist.
Before: Ignoring crime and the plight of blacks in the inner city is racist. Which is it?
Libs just go with what fits their narrative at the time.
Before: Ignoring crime and the plight of blacks in the inner city is racist. Which is it?
Libs just go with what fits their narrative at the time.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
I love educating liberals that gerrymandering was actually created to get more diversity in politics.
When districts used to make sense, there was never enough minority population in any one area to elect minority candidates to congress. This was especially true before the "War on Poverty" created the ghetto culture we see today and massive white flight from inner city living.
It was actually far-left liberal policies and those on the extreme of the civil rights movement that demanded congressional districts be retraced like children's drawings so that blacks would be elected to congress. Blacks like Elijah Cummings, whose district was redrawn in 1973 to create a black majority.
This is his district since 2013:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryl..._US_Congressional_District_7_(since_2013).tif
If that district shape makes sense to you, please explain it to me (but of course, this map was part of the Supreme Court case of gerrymandering by democrats).
But wait, there is more!
The media loves to tell you Cummings' district has a $60,000 median income, is 60% black and is 67% white collar. But those demographics ONLY STARTED in 2013!!!
Here is what Cummings' 7th District looked like BEFORE 2013:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryl...sional_Districts_in_Maryland_(2003–2013).tiff
Notice the difference? What was a district THAT WAS ENTIRELY west Baltimore and likely 80% black got changed in 2013 to include more affluent, more rural and more white areas on either side of Rt. 83. Now these areas aren't nearly populated enough to vote Cumming out. And they are still mostly "pull democrat lever" voters.
But this is the exact type of the misinformation that the Media loves to talk about.
When districts used to make sense, there was never enough minority population in any one area to elect minority candidates to congress. This was especially true before the "War on Poverty" created the ghetto culture we see today and massive white flight from inner city living.
It was actually far-left liberal policies and those on the extreme of the civil rights movement that demanded congressional districts be retraced like children's drawings so that blacks would be elected to congress. Blacks like Elijah Cummings, whose district was redrawn in 1973 to create a black majority.
This is his district since 2013:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryl..._US_Congressional_District_7_(since_2013).tif
If that district shape makes sense to you, please explain it to me (but of course, this map was part of the Supreme Court case of gerrymandering by democrats).
But wait, there is more!
The media loves to tell you Cummings' district has a $60,000 median income, is 60% black and is 67% white collar. But those demographics ONLY STARTED in 2013!!!
Here is what Cummings' 7th District looked like BEFORE 2013:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryl...sional_Districts_in_Maryland_(2003–2013).tiff
Notice the difference? What was a district THAT WAS ENTIRELY west Baltimore and likely 80% black got changed in 2013 to include more affluent, more rural and more white areas on either side of Rt. 83. Now these areas aren't nearly populated enough to vote Cumming out. And they are still mostly "pull democrat lever" voters.
But this is the exact type of the misinformation that the Media loves to talk about.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,568
- Reaction score
- 15,127
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
Clinton ERA judge lays the smack down on the DNC.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fed...-suit-russia-trump-campaign/story?id=64664813
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-hacking-dismissed
A federal judge in New York on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Democratic National Committee against the Russian government, President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Wikileaks that alleged a vast, international conspiracy to tip the scales of the 2016 presidential election.
Interested in Russia Investigation?
Add Russia Investigation as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Russia Investigation news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Russia Investigation Add Interest
In an 81-page opinion, Judge John Koeltl wrote that the Russian government was the “primary wrongdoer” in the alleged plot to hack into the DNC’s systems and steal a trove of emails and documents.
The publication of the emails by the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks was protected by the First Amendment, as was the praise and further dissemination of the emails by figures in the Trump campaign, Koeltl said.
(MORE: Republicans clash over control of Trump, RNC fundraising efforts)
Trump, who as a candidate applauded WikiLeaks' disclosures, was not named as a defendant in the case.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Russian government, in turn, was protected from the civil suit by U.S. foreign sovereignty law, the judge said, echoing Russia’s own response.
The suit, which was filed in April 2018 and named high-profile defendants like Trump’s son Donald Trump, Jr., and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, sparked a court battle of accusations and counter-accusations between the parties that mirrored the long-running public debates about Russia’s purported interference and any potential links to the Trump campaign.
The DNC alleged an "act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency." Specifically, the DNC accused the defendants of violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, known as RICO, in its lawsuit.
Each defendant vigorously defended their respective roles in the alleged plot and sought to have the suit thrown out. In a motion to dismiss, the 2016 Trump campaign said the case was just a way for the Democrats to “explain away [the DNC] candidate’s defeat in the 2016 presidential election.”
When special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference was released in April 2019 and said that the 22-month investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and the Russians, attorneys for the defendants renewed their arguments for dismissing the DNC suit. At the time, a source familiar with the DNC’s legal strategy told ABC News they were unbowed by Mueller’s finding and said that the bar for criminality was higher than for civil liability.
On Tuesday, Judge Koeltl ruled against the DNC.
“The DNC argues that the various meetings and conversations between the defendants in this case and with persons connected to the Russian government during the time that Russian GRU agents were stealing the DNC’s information show that the defendants conspired with the Russian Federation to steal and disseminate the DNC’s materials,” Koeltl wrote. “That argument is entirely divorced from the facts actually alleged in the Second Amended complaint.”
A spokesperson for the DNC, Xochitl Hinojosa, said the Democratic organization was still reviewing the decision.
“At first glance, this opinion raises serious concerns about our protections from foreign election interference and the theft of private property to advance the interests of our enemies,” Hinojosa said. “At a time when the Trump administration and Republican leaders in Congress are ignoring warnings from the president's own intelligence officials about foreign interference in the 2020 election, this should be of concern to anyone who cares about our democracy and the sanctity of our elections.”
Trump hailed the lawsuit’s dismissal on Twitter, calling it a “total & complete” vindication of what the president called “hoax” allegations.
And an attorney for Trump’s former political adviser and named defendant, Roger Stone, told ABC News Tuesday, “We are very pleased that the Court saw through the Democrats’ thin lawsuit.”
ABC News’ Ali Dukakis contributed to this report.
Comments
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fed...-suit-russia-trump-campaign/story?id=64664813
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-hacking-dismissed
A federal judge in New York on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Democratic National Committee against the Russian government, President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Wikileaks that alleged a vast, international conspiracy to tip the scales of the 2016 presidential election.
Interested in Russia Investigation?
Add Russia Investigation as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Russia Investigation news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Russia Investigation Add Interest
In an 81-page opinion, Judge John Koeltl wrote that the Russian government was the “primary wrongdoer” in the alleged plot to hack into the DNC’s systems and steal a trove of emails and documents.
The publication of the emails by the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks was protected by the First Amendment, as was the praise and further dissemination of the emails by figures in the Trump campaign, Koeltl said.
(MORE: Republicans clash over control of Trump, RNC fundraising efforts)
Trump, who as a candidate applauded WikiLeaks' disclosures, was not named as a defendant in the case.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Russian government, in turn, was protected from the civil suit by U.S. foreign sovereignty law, the judge said, echoing Russia’s own response.
The suit, which was filed in April 2018 and named high-profile defendants like Trump’s son Donald Trump, Jr., and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, sparked a court battle of accusations and counter-accusations between the parties that mirrored the long-running public debates about Russia’s purported interference and any potential links to the Trump campaign.
The DNC alleged an "act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency." Specifically, the DNC accused the defendants of violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, known as RICO, in its lawsuit.
Each defendant vigorously defended their respective roles in the alleged plot and sought to have the suit thrown out. In a motion to dismiss, the 2016 Trump campaign said the case was just a way for the Democrats to “explain away [the DNC] candidate’s defeat in the 2016 presidential election.”
When special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference was released in April 2019 and said that the 22-month investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and the Russians, attorneys for the defendants renewed their arguments for dismissing the DNC suit. At the time, a source familiar with the DNC’s legal strategy told ABC News they were unbowed by Mueller’s finding and said that the bar for criminality was higher than for civil liability.
On Tuesday, Judge Koeltl ruled against the DNC.
“The DNC argues that the various meetings and conversations between the defendants in this case and with persons connected to the Russian government during the time that Russian GRU agents were stealing the DNC’s information show that the defendants conspired with the Russian Federation to steal and disseminate the DNC’s materials,” Koeltl wrote. “That argument is entirely divorced from the facts actually alleged in the Second Amended complaint.”
A spokesperson for the DNC, Xochitl Hinojosa, said the Democratic organization was still reviewing the decision.
“At first glance, this opinion raises serious concerns about our protections from foreign election interference and the theft of private property to advance the interests of our enemies,” Hinojosa said. “At a time when the Trump administration and Republican leaders in Congress are ignoring warnings from the president's own intelligence officials about foreign interference in the 2020 election, this should be of concern to anyone who cares about our democracy and the sanctity of our elections.”
Trump hailed the lawsuit’s dismissal on Twitter, calling it a “total & complete” vindication of what the president called “hoax” allegations.
And an attorney for Trump’s former political adviser and named defendant, Roger Stone, told ABC News Tuesday, “We are very pleased that the Court saw through the Democrats’ thin lawsuit.”
ABC News’ Ali Dukakis contributed to this report.
Comments
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
LOL
A rat runs through a FOX45 Baltimore Reporter’s live shot during a story on President Trump’s tweet Baltimore is rat infested
https://twitter.com/FOXBaltimore/status/1155945892148420615
A rat runs through a FOX45 Baltimore Reporter’s live shot during a story on President Trump’s tweet Baltimore is rat infested
https://twitter.com/FOXBaltimore/status/1155945892148420615
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Winning!
Democrats Lose Trump-Campaign Russia-Conspiracy Lawsuit
PRESIDENT Donald Trump scored a win Tuesday when a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee claiming his presidential campaign conspired with Russia and WikiLeaks to hack the DNC’s emails in the run-up to the 2016 election.
Trump celebrated the ruling on Twitter calling it an end to the “Witch Hunt.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...russia-wikileaks-and-trump-campaign-dismissed
Democrats Lose Trump-Campaign Russia-Conspiracy Lawsuit
PRESIDENT Donald Trump scored a win Tuesday when a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee claiming his presidential campaign conspired with Russia and WikiLeaks to hack the DNC’s emails in the run-up to the 2016 election.
Trump celebrated the ruling on Twitter calling it an end to the “Witch Hunt.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...russia-wikileaks-and-trump-campaign-dismissed
It is a continuous cycle Spike. They lose one, open another...same day.
Where's that guy been??? Anyone know?
He made a post just a few days ago, so I know he is lurking. I think he is waiting for me to click my heels three times and call his name.
You rang?
Bout time I get to collect on the government gravy train. My experienced rodent eradication experts will safely eliminate rats for a minimum wage of $300/hour. To alleviate any racism concerns they will only kill white rats.
Yay our favorite RatBird is back! Welcome back Ed.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to EdReed4Prez again.