• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Trump isn’t and never has been a conservative. No sane, actual conservative believes that he is.

Do you know why so many republicans like the guy? Because he flat out rejects the nonsense from the left. For many, that’s enough. For others, they love that he’s a world class troll.

None of the recent Republican presidential nominees have stood up to democrats on anything. They talk in platitudes and say nothing. Sound bites. People are tired of that stuff. They want action, and Trump has provided that, good, bad or indifferent.

If any actual conservative stood up for their constituents, there never would have been a president Trump.
Oldie but a goodie. Bears repeating.

 
No, I do not see "one as the oppressor, and one as the oppressed." Far from it, I think nothing of the sort. I'm a centrist who thinks there are plenty of liberal and conservative values and ideas that are relevant, legitimate, and credible. I think there are extremists on the far left and the far right, who are hellbent on destroying this nation, and will do anything in their power to deepen the divide and tear Americans apart. I also think Trump is one of those people, and is the absolute worst thing to happen to this nation, as far as being elected to the highest office in the land. It has been nothing short of disastrous, primarily for conservatives, and traditional conservative values. Not to speak of true, foundational Christian values. Maybe you don't see it that way, and I have no issues with that. I get it. You're content to focus on the things you like, and ignore the rest. You have every right to do so.

It does seem strange to me how odd it is to you, that there are Americans out there like me, who simply reject this President on moral grounds, not to speak of his unhinged, unmoored, ad hoc policies. I also think you wildly miscalculate the actual, real-world support of this President, and the MAGA movement. I have no doubt, this is what you see in your immediate surroundings, where you live and work, the people you meet and interact with. Maybe you and those folks are resoundingly pro-MAGA and pro-Trump. Probably the same for the news you read and watch. So in your mind, this is a great President with resounding support around the country, everything is going swimmingly, and you simply can't wrap your head around why anyone would think differently.

Maybe, just maybe, I'm not alone in my absolute disdain, and disgust, for this President, and everything he has done to stain and degrade this nation, including the conservative movement in America, whatever is left of it. Sadly, the Democrats offer little to no serious alternative, thus we're stuck in the mud until Trump goes waddling off.
I'll need that extra large black to go, hon.
 
Who's offended, you miserable dipsh*t? I love Indy's AI slop posts, I think they're hilarious. It provides a front-row seat to the utter, unmitigated mental breakdown happening in real time by Trump and his supporters. It proves beyond any reasonable doubt how idiotic, immature, and infantile this President is, with his drooling, troll supporters in tow.

To see the Office of the Presidency debased like this, on a daily basis, is par for the course for this deranged President, and all those around him, who empower him, and allow this to go on. Absolute cinema. You simply can't make this sh*t up.

There is nothing - zilch, zero - offensive about any of this. It is a national sociological experiment playing out in real time. One for the annals of American history.

Spare me your blathering explanations.
Trump is living in your head rent free and you’ve invited Indy to join him.
 
Good to know how far-right extremist cunts like you like to get off

Like you got off publicly, in front of the world on X, celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk.

Sir, kindly **** off. You're an absolute hypocritical insult. You wish for and celebrate the death of those who think differently than you, and that makes you vermin. Take your holier than thou sentiments and shove them up your Hungarian ***. You're a danger to society.
 
Last edited:
I'm a centrist

Exactly where we all stopped reading. Seriously dude, do you really believe this?? I'm asking you seriously, do you actually in your head, between your ears, believe this? LMAO. You're as close to center as I am to Antarctica.

You are Alt. Alt left. Own it.
 
Like you got off publicly, in front of the world on X, celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk. Sir, kindly **** off. You're an absolute hypocritical insult. You wish for and celebrate the death of those who think differently than you, and that makes you vermin. Take your holier than thou sentiments and shove them up your Hungarian ***. You're a danger to society.

You are truly messed up in the head, Tim. You may want to get that checked.

You keep bringing this up as some sort of Eureka! moment, when I told you point blank I never tweeted anything disparaging about Charlie Kirk. I've shared over 80,000 tweets over the years, most of which are curating the Arts: literature, philosophy, religion, nature photography, architecture, and sharing classical music clips that I edit and post myself. You took some random tweet of mine and YOU pointed at it "claiming" I posted it to subliminally mock Charlie Kirk's assassination, which is an absolute lie and a figment of your imagination.

Besides a call for peace via a MLK Jr. quotation, nothing I posted in the days before, during or after Sept 10th had anything to do with Charlie Kirk. My posts during this time were consistent with the dozens, hundreds, thousands of similar tweets I've written and posted over the years, these just happened to fall on the same day as Kirk's assassination.

If you're pointing to the Charles Darwin tweet, it's a whimsical post sharing the hilariously grouchy notes he wrote in his diary in the mid-19th century. I can show you dozens of similar tweets I've written, highlighting blurbs of literature, poetry, and the like.

If I wanted to mock or ridicule Kirk, I would have written a tweet and done so, as so many others did that day, and afterwards, for weeks and months. I did nothing of the sort.

For you to sit there and make such a preposterous claim, that you know what my intent was in writing and curating my tweets, is the textbook definition of insanity. No wonder you succumb to Trump on so many levels, and leave your sense and reason at the curb.

Since you are so infatuated with me, and my tweets, and consistently spread lies about me, here are my tweets from around this time frame in September of last year.

You are chasing shadows and boogeymen in the depths of your cold, dark soul... which you have every right to do. Just stop projecting your insanity onto me, and others around you, that's all I ask.



1788432251325.png 1788432273273.png 1788432300547.png 1788432328770.png

1788432372823.png 1788432418568.png 1788432462196.png 1788432489049.png 1788432525649.png

1788432573918.png
 
Last edited:
No, I do not see "one as the oppressor, and one as the oppressed." Far from it, I think nothing of the sort. I'm a centrist who thinks there are plenty of liberal and conservative values and ideas that are relevant, legitimate, and credible. I think there are extremists on the far left and the far right, who are hellbent on destroying this nation, and will do anything in their power to deepen the divide and tear Americans apart. I also think Trump is one of those people, and is the absolute worst thing to happen to this nation, as far as being elected to the highest office in the land. It has been nothing short of disastrous, primarily for conservatives, and traditional conservative values. Not to speak of true, foundational Christian values. Maybe you don't see it that way, and I have no issues with that. I get it. You're content to focus on the things you like, and ignore the rest. You have every right to do so.

It does seem strange to me how odd it is to you, that there are Americans out there like me, who simply reject this President on moral grounds, not to speak of his unhinged, unmoored, ad hoc policies. I also think you wildly miscalculate the actual, real-world support of this President, and the MAGA movement. I have no doubt, this is what you see in your immediate surroundings, where you live and work, the people you meet and interact with. Maybe you and those folks are resoundingly pro-MAGA and pro-Trump. Probably the same for the news you read and watch. So in your mind, this is a great President with resounding support around the country, everything is going swimmingly, and you simply can't wrap your head around why anyone would think differently.

Maybe, just maybe, I'm not alone in my absolute disdain, and disgust, for this President, and everything he has done to stain and degrade this nation, including the conservative movement in America, whatever is left of it. Sadly, the Democrats offer little to no serious alternative, thus we're stuck in the mud until Trump goes waddling off.
One thing that stood out here is your rejection of President Trump based on moral grounds. Specifically, what moral standard do you believe he's failing to adhere to? Yes, he's narcissistic, just like every other politician out there, but immoral?

As far as a Presidency that's been nothing short of disastrous, that title goes to President Obama, fundamentally changing our nation and leaving it divided, in the chaos that we find ourselves living in today. Trump wasn't elected to start a fire, he was elected to put it out.
 
No, I do not see "one as the oppressor, and one as the oppressed." Far from it, I think nothing of the sort. I'm a centrist ....

giphy.gif
 
You keep bringing this up as some sort of Eureka! moment, when I told you point blank I never tweeted anything disparaging about Charlie Kirk.

You keep trying to walk this back. You cannot. The volume of your tweets, and the 4 paragraphs of blather above don't change a thing about your post. The internet never forgets.
  • You just happen to post this on the VERY day he was murdered.
  • “Some days are undeniably Charles Darwin days” is paired with an image that emphasizes Darwin's statements about hating, being tired of, or being hostile toward people and the world.
  • Your choice of emojis was clever, but obvious. Two "surprise" emojis followed by the "crying laughing" emoji - i.e., = “this is horrifying/OMG—and also I'm laughing at it”. No one laughs at or about Darwin.
  • You sourced from “Cheerful Nihilism” reinforcing that your post is deliberately dark, nihilistic humor - not a sincere historical observation about Darwin.

1788445742553.png

Your friend, Deb, who replied also on September 10, also got your intent.

1788446367490.png

It would be honorable if you would just own it, but you never will. Doesn't matter really. Everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you meant.
 
Tim, you may be clinically insane.

I don't know how many ways I can say this. That post had absolutely nothing to do with Kirk. Zero, zilch. The response from "Deb" also had nothing to do with with Kirk. Zero, zilch.

You are so far deep down the rabbit hole, you have become unmoored from reality. I am saddened by this, and take no pleasure in it.
 
You are truly messed up in the head, Tim. You may want to get that checked.

You keep bringing this up as some sort of Eureka! moment, when I told you point blank I never tweeted anything disparaging about Charlie Kirk. I've shared over 80,000 tweets over the years, most of which are curating the Arts: literature, philosophy, religion, nature photography, architecture, and sharing classical music clips that I edit and post myself. You took some random tweet of mine and YOU pointed at it "claiming" I posted it to subliminally mock Charlie Kirk's assassination, which is an absolute lie and a figment of your imagination.

Besides a call for peace via a MLK Jr. quotation, nothing I posted in the days before, during or after Sept 10th had anything to do with Charlie Kirk. My posts during this time were consistent with the dozens, hundreds, thousands of similar tweets I've written and posted over the years, these just happened to fall on the same day as Kirk's assassination.

If you're pointing to the Charles Darwin tweet, it's a whimsical post sharing the hilariously grouchy notes he wrote in his diary in the mid-19th century. I can show you dozens of similar tweets I've written, highlighting blurbs of literature, poetry, and the like.

If I wanted to mock or ridicule Kirk, I would have written a tweet and done so, as so many others did that day, and afterwards, for weeks and months. I did nothing of the sort.

For you to sit there and make such a preposterous claim, that you know what my intent was in writing and curating my tweets, is the textbook definition of insanity. No wonder you succumb to Trump on so many levels, and leave your sense and reason at the curb.

Since you are so infatuated with me, and my tweets, and consistently spread lies about me, here are my tweets from around this time frame in September of last year.

You are chasing shadows and boogeymen in the depths of your cold, dark soul... which you have every right to do. Just stop projecting your insanity onto me, and others around you, that's all I ask.



View attachment 18308 View attachment 18309 View attachment 18310 View attachment 18311

View attachment 18312 View attachment 18313 View attachment 18314 View attachment 18315 View attachment 18316

View attachment 18317
as your skirt wearing sister in maternal arms with pink hair and a dilly-do shoved deep in ze's brownstar would say:

"Eight paragraphs to explain? and 7 images? lol. Take the L. You're in a cult"
/Floglocuck
 
You keep trying to walk this back. You cannot. The volume of your tweets, and the 4 paragraphs of blather above don't change a thing about your post. The internet never forgets.
  • You just happen to post this on the VERY day he was murdered.
  • “Some days are undeniably Charles Darwin days” is paired with an image that emphasizes Darwin's statements about hating, being tired of, or being hostile toward people and the world.
  • Your choice of emojis was clever, but obvious. Two "surprise" emojis followed by the "crying laughing" emoji - i.e., = “this is horrifying/OMG—and also I'm laughing at it”. No one laughs at or about Darwin.
  • You sourced from “Cheerful Nihilism” reinforcing that your post is deliberately dark, nihilistic humor - not a sincere historical observation about Darwin.

View attachment 18318

Your friend, Deb, who replied also on September 10, also got your intent.

View attachment 18319

It would be honorable if you would just own it, but you never will. Doesn't matter really. Everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you meant.
Owned. Absolutely destroyed. No one buys his lies about anything. And he always lies.
 
One thing that stood out here is your rejection of President Trump based on moral grounds. Specifically, what moral standard do you believe he's failing to adhere to? Yes, he's narcissistic, just like every other politician out there, but immoral?

As far as a Presidency that's been nothing short of disastrous, that title goes to President Obama, fundamentally changing our nation and leaving it divided, in the chaos that we find ourselves living in today. Trump wasn't elected to start a fire, he was elected to put it out.
Trumps narcissism is on another level. As far as morality, he is just not a nice person. Cheating on his wives, calling reporters piggy, mocking a disabled guy, putting down service members, walking into pagent dressing rooms, admitting 0 fault for anything, etc etc. There is a difference between standing up to people and acting like a spoiled toddler. He could easily roast the dems with rational logic like Charlie Kirk did there is 0 reason to throw temper tantrums. It is just not professional at all. People on here mock the libs for getting all butt hurt but Trump does the same thing. I'd is just sad to see the maturity level of the president and government in general.
 
Trumps narcissism is on another level. As far as morality, he is just not a nice person. Cheating on his wives, calling reporters piggy, mocking a disabled guy, putting down service members, walking into pagent dressing rooms, admitting 0 fault for anything, etc etc. There is a difference between standing up to people and acting like a spoiled toddler. He could easily roast the dems with rational logic like Charlie Kirk did there is 0 reason to throw temper tantrums. It is just not professional at all. People on here mock the libs for getting all butt hurt but Trump does the same thing. I'd is just sad to see the maturity level of the president and government in general.
He does a lot of nice things that Fake News doesn't report on. And he doesn't welch on bets.
 
He does a lot of nice things that Fake News doesn't report on. And he doesn't welch on bets.

Which Fake News outlets would that be? These Fake News outlets?

1. Legacy & Major Outlets Shifting Rightward

CBS News / Paramount – Now controlled by tech billionaire Larry Ellison (a Trump ally). The network installed a Trump-aligned network ombudsman and appointed right-leaning figure Bari Weiss as Editor-in-Chief, leading to high-profile firings of traditional journalists at 60 Minutes.

CNN (Pending Transition) – Paramount Skydance is finalizing an $110.9 billion takeover of CNN's parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery. CNN is facing intense internal anxiety that its leadership will lean rightward to align with the administration.

The Washington Post – Owned by Jeff Bezos; famously canceled its 2024 presidential endorsement and pivoted its opinion page mission toward free markets and personal liberties.

The Los Angeles Times – Restructuring its editorial board to feature conservative voices after its owner stopped a planned Democratic endorsement.

Univision – The nation's largest Spanish-language broadcaster pivoted its historically critical stance to actively build a closer relationship with Trump.

The Baltimore Sun – Acquired by David Smith, the executive chairman of conservative local TV broadcasting giant Sinclair.

2. Industry-Wide Local & Infrastructure Takeovers

Nexstar Media Group (Tegna) – Nexstar struck a $6.2 billion deal to acquire Tegna, combining the nation's largest local television affiliate networks into a massive broadcast empire. Bipartisan critics warn this consolidation will push standardized, right-leaning local programming across the U.S.

Fox Corporation (Roku) – Fox executed a massive $22 billion deal to acquire Roku. This gives a major conservative media empire direct, algorithmic control over the digital streaming gateway used by over 100 million U.S. households.

James Murdoch & Penske Media (Vox & New York Magazine) – James Murdoch purchased Vox Media's podcast network and New York magazine in a $300 million deal, while Penske Media absorbed the remaining digital publishing brands like The Verge, steering them away from traditional progressive ownership structures.

Axel Springer (The Telegraph) – The German media conglomerate (owner of Politico and Business Insider) finalized a £575 million takeover of Britain’s Telegraph Media Group, locking another massive center-right legacy newspaper under its corporate banner.

Sinclair Broadcasting – Continues aggressive distribution of conservative-leaning local news packages across the country.
 
Oh, maybe you were thinking of social media. Lolz

But yeah, nothing will keep you or Trump from crying and whining about the "lying, Fake News media." It's become a foundational tenet of MAGA, can't quit now, even if it's an absolute falsehood.

X (formerly Twitter) – Owned by Elon Musk, the platform operates as a central, high-engagement distribution hub for pro-Trump commentary, administrative policy, and high-profile MAGA influencers. It systematically rolled back previous content moderation rules and reinstated thousands of previously banned conservative accounts.

Meta (Facebook & Instagram) – Underwent a major structural shift by systematically dismantling its content moderation infrastructure and ending its independent, third-party fact-checking programs. To realign with the political environment, leadership also scaled back corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Truth Social – Founded by Donald Trump, it serves as the ultimate primary distribution network for official executive orders, policy scoops, and unmediated White House announcements. It acts effectively as a secondary, paid-access press office for the administration.

Rumble – The primary video-hosting alternative to YouTube. It partnered directly with Trump Media to provide underlying cloud services and acts as the streaming hub for uncut administration rallies, conservative podcasts, and outlets like Newsmax and OANN.
 
Trumps narcissism is on another level. As far as morality, he is just not a nice person. Cheating on his wives, calling reporters piggy, mocking a disabled guy, putting down service members, walking into pagent dressing rooms, admitting 0 fault for anything, etc etc. There is a difference between standing up to people and acting like a spoiled toddler. He could easily roast the dems with rational logic like Charlie Kirk did there is 0 reason to throw temper tantrums. It is just not professional at all. People on here mock the libs for getting all butt hurt but Trump does the same thing. I'd is just sad to see the maturity level of the president and government in general.
you dull points have been explained, and shown how they were taken out of context.

except for the Piggy reference. while juvenile, he was on target.
 
Oh, maybe you were thinking of social media. Lolz

But yeah, nothing will keep you or Trump from crying and whining about the "lying, Fake News media." It's become a foundational tenet of MAGA, can't quit now, even if it's an absolute falsehood.
now do The View.
 
Which Fake News outlets would that be? These Fake News outlets?
I'm not going to list the countless cash donations that he's made to those in need or the emergency use of his planes. I know what he's done and I don't give a F if you do or not.
 
Best post I've read on here in a long time. 💯
It is what most of us have been saying all along. You just hate the man so much it overrides your rationality. He is exactly what the Democrats have been for decades but even more pompous than them a little cruder. Democrats just can't stand their own methods being used against them and threatening to end their cheating and corruption. He also threatens the same for many on the right as well which is why many in the rights power structure fought him so hard.
 
Tim, you may be clinically insane.

I don't know how many ways I can say this. That post had absolutely nothing to do with Kirk. Zero, zilch. The response from "Deb" also had nothing to do with with Kirk. Zero, zilch.

You are so far deep down the rabbit hole, you have become unmoored from reality. I am saddened by this, and take no pleasure in it.
While that's nice, where is my damn coffee?
 
Top