• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Does this seem to you as the behavior of a sane, competent individual? How does it not alarm you this man sits in the WH? If Trump so happened to be a Democrat, I would 100% feel the same way about him. My opinion on Trump has nothing to do with party politics. I happen to think Trump is borderline deranged. These are tenets of a wildly erratic, confused person. I have a hard time understanding how any of you can take him seriously or moreso, how you do not view him to be a clear and present danger given the position he's in?

An airing of grievances: Trump spends days issuing a torrent of complaints against foes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5d477d9a226_story.html?utm_term=.8f14716d17dc

President Trump spent nearly three minutes at a luncheon this week welcoming the presidents of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — whose difficult-to-pronounce names he never uttered publicly — and saying he should be given “credit” for pressuring countries like theirs to give more money to NATO.

As he concluded, White House staffers started to shepherd a small group of journalists out of the room — but Trump was far from done sharing his complaints. As reporters shouted out questions about the plunging stock market and the brewing trade war with China, Trump quickly engaged.

“I have to say this,” Trump said during the appearance Tuesday afternoon, as Defense Secretary Jim Mattis unfurled a white napkin and placed it on his lap. “China. I have great respect for President Xi. Two of the most incredible days of my life were spent in China. . . . He’s a tremendous person. But we have a problem with China.”

Over the next 15 minutes, White House staffers would try at least a half dozen more times to move reporters out of the room, only to have the president stop them with another gripe or plea for credit. Sometimes, the lead television camera would inch backward toward the door, as Trump grew smaller on the screen, just to be pushed back into place as the president leaped at another chance to defend himself and his presidency.

Trump’s venting in recent days has seemed excessive, even for him. His grievances have come in torrents, littered with inaccuracies he continues to state as facts. The pattern continued Wednesday morning, as he tweeted about the trade fight with China and “very weak” border security laws.

It started Saturday morning as he lashed out on Twitter at the “Fake Washington Post,” the “Failing New York Times” and the governor of California while being driven to one of his golf courses in Florida. It continued on Easter Sunday, as he complained that Mexico was not doing enough to stop the flow of undocumented immigrants into the United States or a caravan of migrants from Honduras. He complained the border is protected by “ridiculous liberal (Democrat) laws” and Republicans needed to pass “tough laws.”

He kept going Monday morning, as he tweeted about the Postal Service rates paid by Amazon — which was founded by Jeffrey P. Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post — and about his own “Department of ‘Justice.’” Minutes later, at the White House Easter Egg Roll, Trump stood between his stoic wife and a bespectacled Easter Bunny — whose face was frozen in an open-mouthed stare — and bragged to a crowd of children about increasing military spending to $700 billion, one of the few bright points for him in the Republican spending bill.

That night on Twitter, Trump called the country’s immigration laws “an Obama joke” and accused Democrats of needlessly delaying his nominations. The next morning, he falsely accused CNN of requiring its employees to proclaim they are “totally anti-Trump” and labeled CNN chief Jeff Zucker as “little” while misspelling his name. He bragged that his approval rating “is higher than Cheatin’ Obama at the same time” in his tenure; the White House has yet to explain what that nickname meant. He again lashed out at Amazon and accused federal postal workers of not having a clue.

Trump repeated many of those same points Tuesday afternoon as his guests waited for him to finish so they could eat lunch.

He mentioned the “caravan” 10 times, called NAFTA “a cash cow” for Mexico and took swipes at both Obama and “crooked Hillary Clinton.” He announced that he plans to send members of the military to the southern border, an apparent surprise to many Pentagon officials. It took the White House six hours to compose an explanation and announce that the administration plans to mobilize the National Guard.

“We’re going to be doing some things militarily,” Trump said while answering the question about the stock market and the brewing trade war with China. “Until we can have a wall and proper security, we’re going to be guarding our border with the military. That’s a big step.”

White House staffers tried a second time to lead reporters out of the room, but the president latched onto a question about the caravan. They tried a third time, but the president responded to a question related to his foreign guests. A fourth time, and he responded to a question about Russia’s president: “Do you want Vladimir Putin to come to the White House, sir?”

"Ideally, we want to be able to get along with Russia,” Trump said, without acknowledging the long-standing threat Russia poses to the Baltic countries represented by his guests. “Getting along with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Now, maybe we will and maybe we won’t. And probably nobody has been tougher to Russia than Donald Trump.”

The president continued to refer to himself in the third person: “The three presidents just told me that NATO is taking in a tremendous amount of money because of Donald Trump. That would have never happened. So NATO is much stronger.”

Trump instructed one of his guests, Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, to praise him on camera, just as he said she had done privately in the Oval Office. She obliged, saying changes to NATO would not be possible without the United States and that its “vital voice and vital leadership” are important.

Trump pressed her: “And has Donald Trump made a difference on NATO?”

Those in the room laughed, as she confirmed he has made a difference. As she continued to speak, Trump cut her off.

“And, again, NATO has taken in billions of dollars more because of me, because I said, ‘You’re delinquent, you’re not paying,’ to many of the countries,” Trump said. “Is that right? Many of the countries weren’t paying.”

He later continued: “Because of me . . . many billions of dollars more than they would have had if you had crooked Hillary Clinton as president. Okay? That I can tell you.”

A reporter asked if Trump considers Putin “a friend or a foe,” and Trump responded: “We’ll find out. I’ll let you know. . . . We’ll see what happens.”

For a fifth time, White House staffers tried to end this impromptu news conference, but then the president responded to a question about the Baltic states. They tried a sixth time, but the president could not resist another query: “Is it Amazon or The Washington Post, sir? What’s Amazon done that bugs you, sir?”

On the seventh try, reporters began to inch out of the room — and Trump responded to a final question about Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, who is accused of bypassing the White House to give his aides massive raises, among other irregularities.

"I hope he’s going to be great,” Trump said, even though his aides have said Pruitt’s job is in jeopardy.

“Time to go, guys,” a White House staffer said, finally herding the reporters out of the room. Another coaxed: “Please move along. Please move along. Please move along now.”

“Thank you, everybody,” Trump shouted after them. “Thank you.”
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry Tibsy but long diatribes just bore me. In modern society, we learn to read for ourselves.

7785fa2b9a85faa89be7591e6312f608.jpg
 
Tibs just has his crotchless panties in a bunch because Trump calls out corruption and lies when he sees it. He’s not a limp-wristed PC terrorist like the Kenyan.
 
One question, if Trump hires only the best, why are they all getting fired?

29683964_764265473776369_6152488808022720360_n.jpg

I think Trump has been listening to Washington insiders advice for so long, in regard to appointments,, and has not served him well. He is at a point now, with some time under his belt, where he is going to do things his way..
And, he does make mistakes.
 
Hey Tibs,

In 102 pages of Trump winning, have you ever once "liked" any post that had to do with the positive steps this country has taken?
Not even once?

That proves you are totally immersed in Trump hating, nothing else matters....you are as immature as a 6 year old.
 
Hey Tibs,

In 102 pages of Trump winning, have you ever once "liked" any post that had to do with the positive steps this country has taken?
Not even once?

That proves you are totally immersed in Trump hating, nothing else matters....you are as immature as a 6 year old.

He's a Liberal. He will hate.
 
Holy ****, Bidness is Boomin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Somebody make a beer run, this party just keeps going and going

Private payrolls grow by 241K in March vs. 205K est.

Companies kept up the hiring pace in March, adding 241,000 positions as employment in construction and manufacturing surged, according to a report Wednesday from ADP and Moody's Analytics.

Economists surveyed by Reuters had been expecting the report to show that private payrolls had gained by 205,000.

This was the fifth straight month that the ADP/Moody's count showed private payrolls up by at least 200,000, though March saw a slight decline from the upwardly revised 246,000 in February. On a year-over-year basis, March 2018 nearly doubled the 122,000 total from the previous year.

"The job market is rip-roaring," Mark Zandi, Moody's Analytics' chief economist, said in a statement. "Monthly job growth remains firmly over 200,000, double the pace of labor force growth. The tight labor market continues to tighten."

Job gains were broad-based, spread across both business size and sector.

Service providers added 176,000 while goods-producing industries contributed 65,000. Construction and manufacturing led the latter category, adding 31,000 and 29,000 respectively.

On the services side, professional and business led with 44,000, while trade, transportation and utilities was next with 40,000. Health care and social assistance added 28,000 while leisure and hospitality grew by 26,000.

Medium-sized firms, with 50 to 499 employees, were the top jobs producers with 127,000 new hires, while large firms added 67,000 and small businesses rose by 47,000.

The ADP/Moody's report comes two days ahead of the closely watched nonfarm payrolls report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Wall Street is looking for growth of about 185,000 and a decline in the unemployment rate to 4 percent from 4.1 percent.

giphy.gif
 
I could have posted on this board every single day since Trump's taken office. Nothing has changed, each day there is chaos and turmoil. My posting here, or not posting here, is never an indication what's happening with this presidency. It's a ******* shitshow and has been nothing but a shitshow from the very beginning. It's time to take the blinders off.



The **** show, chaos, and turmoil are all in your head....they are symptoms of Trump being president and poor you not able to come to terms with it.
 
Last edited:
The **** show, chaos, and turmoil are all in your head....they are symptoms of Trump being president and poor you not able to come to terms with it.

They will never stop Stewey.....

po584a49cc.jpg


But that''s OK....I'll take my entertainment any way I can.

th
th

liberals-waaah.jpg


You wanna really piss them off ??

not-only-is-donald-trump-my-president-oneck-n-rednecknationgear-com-28082038.png


Bwahahahaha
 
Back to speaking of winning...........

Remember the "caravan" ?
An “army” of Central Americans, estimated to be at about 1,500 people, with 80 percent of them from Honduras, have started on a journey through Mexico towards the U.S. border, intending to request asylum when they arrive.

th


President Donald Trump sharpened his anti-immigration rhetoric on Tuesday, saying he wants to deploy U.S. military forces to the Mexican border to stop illegal immigrants until his long-promised wall is built and "proper security" is in place.

th


Well....seems that caravan ain't coming after all.

MATIAS ROMERO, Mexico (Reuters) - Mexican officials on Tuesday screened a dwindling group of hundreds of largely Central American migrants who are moving through Mexico toward the United States, seeking to break up the "caravan" that has drawn the ire of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump, doubling down on his tough stance against illegal immigration, has railed against those making their way from the Guatemala-Mexico border in the past 10 days.

Trump repeated threats to torpedo the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which underpins much of Mexico's foreign trade, and said he wanted to send troops to the U.S. border to stop illegal immigrants until a long-promised border wall is built.

In response, the Mexican government has said the migrants are being vetted to determine whether they have a right to stay, or would be returned to their countries of origin.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mexico-throws-bureaucracy-migrant-caravan-dispersal-begins-182828647.html

Word on the street is that there was another threat that didn't get publicized.

GDTLWOj.png


OOPS....never mind, they said....LOL
 
meanwhile, Go Bernie Go!



Barack Obama supporters outraged by Bernie Sanders' 'deplorable' attack on Democratic Party


Vermont Senator says business model of Democratic Party has been a failure for 15 years

Bernie Sanders has triggered a backlash by making comments interpreted as an attack on Barack Obama on the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King.

The senator for Vermont appeared to criticise the first black US President as he branded the Democratic Party a "failure".

Speaking in Jackson, Mississippi, he said Democrats had lost a record number of legislative seats.

"The business model, if you like, of the Democratic Party for the last 15 years or so has been a failure,' said the Vermont Senator. "People sometimes don't see that because there was a charismatic individual named Barack Obama. He was obviously an extraordinary candidate, brilliant guy. But beyond that reality...."

Mr Sanders' comments were quickly branded "patronising" and "deplorable".

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...sassination-jackson-mississippi-a8289456.html
 
WINNING!!

Trump gains ground, much to liberals’ horror

In 2010, as President Obama’s popularity spiraled downward, Jeff Greenfield wrote for CBS News that “historically, no president in modern times has significantly improved his approval numbers in his second year.” Don’t look now, but some polls show President Trump is doing just that.

In the second year of his presidency, President Trump’s approval ratings are climbing, to the utter horror of liberals, who cannot for the life of them understand why.

Some 51 percent of the country now supports the president, according to the Rasmussen poll – up from 42 percent a year ago.

President Obama, at the same date, had 47 percent of the country behind him, down from 57 percent the year earlier.


The stock market is skittish, trade wars loom, President Trump tweets with abandon, Stormy Daniels dominates headlines, White House staff members come and go, and – oh yes – there’s pesky Special Counsel Robert Mueller trying to find evidence that President Trump obstructed justice or that he or his campaign conspired with the Russians.

Democrats wonder, how on Earth can Trump be gaining ground?

Here’s a clue: real growth is running above 3 percent, unemployment claims are the lowest since 1969, wage growth is the best since 2009 and Americans are more optimistic than they have been since 2004.


These are stunning stats, but just as important is this: many Americans think the president is trying to do the right thing. They view him as confronting a hostile media and an entrenched bureaucracy. And on numerous policy issues – like immigration, gun control and trade with China – President Trump is in synch with most Americans.
The same cannot be said for progressive Democrats or, for that matter, many of the Freedom Caucus very conservative types.

How do we know? Polling on the “direction of the country” indicates that Americans are more positive on what’s going on in the United States than they have been since 2009.

Meanwhile, approval ratings for Congress show it surely isn’t our legislators who are getting credit for the positive trend.

The president has long called out media bias; the public is beginning to agree with him. In a recent Gallup survey, nearly half the country thinks that there is a “great deal” of political bias in our news coverage, up from 37 percent in 2012.

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 52 percent of likely U.S. voters believe “when most reporters write or talk about the president, they are trying to block him from passing his agenda,” up from 44 percent a year ago and 47 percent in August.

This is why President Trump calls out the media at every opportunity. Not only is he right, it makes him an underdog, and Americans love underdogs.

On immigration, the president, like most of the country, supports a path to legal status for the so-called Dreamers, but also favors tightening our borders. A huge majority of the country agrees, with both those opinions.

A Harvard Harris poll conducted earlier this year found that 79 percent of Americans favor a secure border, and nearly 70 percent oppose the diversity lottery system now in place. Almost 80 percent prefer merit-based immigration to a policy that prioritizes family ties. A Morning Consult/Politico poll also revealed a preference for merit-based immigration.

The left has become untethered on this topic, increasingly equating legal and illegal immigration. Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez says that asking about citizenship on the U.S. census form is a "craven attack on our democracy." He’s got it exactly backwards; sending legislators to Congress to represent people who are in the country illegally is an attack on our democracy, and most Americans agree.

Gun control is another issue on which the president has veered towards the popular middle, demanding that his administration produce a rule banning bump stocks, for instance.

President Trump’s open White House meeting after the Parkland shootings shocked the political establishment, as the president called out his GOP colleagues for being in thrall to the National Rifle Association and proposed expanded background checks as well as other controversial measures. Though he later walked back his endorsement of further gun controls, he left no doubt that he was behind commonsense reforms, even if political necessity required a more tempered approach.

It appears that President Trump’s efforts to confront China have widespread appeal, and not just in the rust belt.

Pew Research reports that Americans’ view of China has deteriorated in recent years, with more than half the country having an unfavorable view of the world’s second-largest economy and, as of last year, 65 percent saying that China is either an adversary or a serious problem. Moreover, the president has the support of businesses operating in China, which have been on the front lines of China’s unfair trade practices and discriminatory rulings.

As many Americans applaud President Trump for his hard line on China or efforts to resolve the DACA issue, they see him hamstrung by unceasing Democratic resistance and a lack of cooperation even from some GOP members of Congress.

But that’s not the only reason that President Trump’s popularity may be inching higher. Unlike President Obama, President Trump did not enter the Oval Office burdened by high expectations.

In describing President Obama’s tough first year, in which he “suffered the steepest decline in job approval of any first year president since they started keeping such data,” Greenfield suggested that the drop was because Obama’s fans were overly optimistic. People expected too much and “more important, he did not come to office with a strong sense of where he was going.”

That is not the case with President Trump. He ran on boosting job creation through lower taxes and lighter regulation, and on making the country more secure. Whether it’s demanding fairer trade with China, tightening our control of our border or passing a big hike in defense spending, his agenda is surprisingly consistent for a man often guided by impulse.

Maybe the increase in approval comes from a much simpler place: President Trump is doing what he promised he would.
 
Tibs will be along soon to correct that version of reality to match his bias.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
In 2010, as President Obama’s popularity spiraled downward, .

Yet for some reason it was never at the forefront of the news...everything was peachy keen.

Today Trumps approval ratings are at 51% and all we're being told is that the Trump presidency is an ongoing dumpster fire.
 
North Korea confirms to White House that it is willing to talk about denuclearization

North Korea has confirmed directly to the Trump administration that it is willing to negotiate with the United States over potential denuclearization, administration officials said Sunday.

The confirmation offers the administration greater assurances that North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un is committed to a potential meeting with President Trump by the end of next month. “The U.S. has confirmed that Kim Jong Un is willing to discuss the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,” an administration official said

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...6b3170-3b66-11e8-a7d1-e4efec6389f0_story.html

-------------------------

President Donald J Trump, Nobel Peace Prize winner
 
North Korea confirms to White House that it is willing to talk about denuclearization

Seems I done heard this song and dance before.....

nKorea_stall.jpg
 
IMG_20180404_153930_.jpg
Trumplosion.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good quote that a friend sent me. I don't know the validity of it but I agree with it.

Does a Military Bias Exist with the Liberal Media?

Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Congressman, recently responded to a biased reporter about the military in response to a stupid question from an equality-focussed CNN reporter about the DoD ban of transgenders from joining the U.S. armed forces. He seems to have nailed it rather succinctly.

Question: How can President Trump claim to represent all U.S citizens, regardless of sexual orientation, when he banned transgenders from joining the military? Isn't that discrimination?

Trey Gowdy's Response: “Nobody has a ‘right’ to serve in the Military. Nobody. What makes people think the Military is an equal opportunity employer? It is very far from it....and for good reasons--let me cite a few.

The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for being too old or too young, too fat or too skinny, too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, or for missing or additional fingers.

Clearly annoyed by the reporter's attempt to trap him with the question....he went on to explain: "By the way, poor eyesight will disqualify you, as well as bad teeth. Malnourished? Drug addiction? Bad back? Criminal history? Low IQ? Anxiety? Phobias? Hearing damage? Six arms? Hear voices in your head? Self-identification as a Unicorn? Need a special access ramp for your wheelchair?

Can't run the required course in the required time? Can't do the required number of push-ups? Not really a ‘morning person’ and refuse to get out of bed before noon? All can be legitimate reasons for denial."

"The Military has one job: Winning War. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. Did someone just scream ‘That isn't Fair’? War is VERY unfair, there are no exceptions made for being special or challenged or socially wonderful.

YOU must change yourself to meet Military standards.....Not the other way around.
I say again: You don't change the Military... you must change yourself. The Military doesn't need to accommodate anyone with special issues. The Military needs to Win Wars....and keep our Country safe....PERIOD!

If any of your personal issues are a liability that detract from readiness or lethality... Thank you for applying and good luck in future endeavors.
Who's next in line?....any other questions?
 
Good quote that a friend sent me. I don't know the validity of it but I agree with it.

Why do Liberals suddenly want to get into the military?
(I know, to get their sex change operations paid for.)
 
Top