We could go back and forth. https://www.truthorfiction.com/john-ashe-dies-days-before-testifying-against-hillary-clinton-donor/
And these are facts:
Seng was tied to the Clintons, and Ashe was going to court with his co-defendant Seng. Of course, nothing they could have testified about could have possibly implicated the Clintons. Of course not.
Seth Rich's death was odd, was it not, considering Julian has alluded to him being his inside mole at the DNC?
Again, I'll say, it's mere coincidence that all of these people tied to the DNC, the Clintons, and or those that cross them in some way die. Those 5 in just weeks. Then you look at Ron Brown and Vince Foster and the rest of the list, and Mother of Pearl, those Clintons must be cursed to lose so many close friends and associates over the decades. Just cursed, I say. Bad fortune always strikes that poor family.
Why don't we let the voters decide?
Oh yeah, that is old school. Let the party elite and superdelegates decide.
Oh yeah, that is old school. Let the party elite and superdelegates decide.
Oh the irony. Thats quite some logic there.
The Clintons cant be caught. The FBI proved Hillary lied, yet she pays no price.
Don't come on here throwing **** hoping it sticks. Congress has 535 members. I shouldn't have to explain to you how fixing the makeup of congress would be an impossibility, and the Clintons aren't rigging the election by themselves ya dummy.
Last edited:
To liberals like Tibby its party over country. Ignore, deny, and lie. Whatever it takes, just so they beat the Republicans.
snopes fact checkers are notoriously biased... Its been shown time and again how selective facts highlighted can spin one of their investigations... Its like mythbusters...
There you are being disingenuous again.
You leftists own the 911 conspiracy. It started with you. Every ****** time I heard that Bush orchestrated 911, it came out of the mouth of a liberal democRAT.
Next you're gonna tell us Michael Moore is a flaming right winger and his Fahrenheit 911 was right wing propaganda film.
The moon landing conspiracy was not linked to any ideology. The "proof" of it being a hoax was debunked a long time ago.
Last edited:
People that turn to Snopes are Liberals, I can only assume.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/f...act-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger
Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.
She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”
She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)
Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)
Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.
After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.
She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.
Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included Benghazi at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.
After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active voter registration status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”
Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”
In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on fake news sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.
Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”
One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing inequality,” wasn’t actually about income inequality.
Own the 9/11 conspiracy? Hell, they own 9/11. 95% of it was planned while Slick Willy was giving flute lessons to Monica in the Oval Office.
Similar threads
