• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

This never happened:Christianity the religion of peace

Elfiero

Banned
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
494
Points
83
war on women....LOL ...you're such a parrot
 
Watch ultra-liberal atheist Bill Mahrer's season finally on HBO. He sets some Canadian straight on how ****** up even the moderate Islamic countries are. She is clearly conflicted over being culturally sensitive and ends up coming full circle.

There is no "forgive the for they know not what they do" in Islam.
 
Where are the training camps to become a radical Catholic so I can learn how to use weapons and make bombs to kill Presbyterians?
 
Elfie the pathetic liberal democRAT when the San Bernardino news was first aired : "Please let the San Bernardino killers be white, please let the San Bernardino killers be white, please let the San Bernardino killers be white...."

Damn it they're not white....gotta go with the hillbilly that shot up the abortion clinic.

So which do you think is a greater threat to you, a white person that happens to be Christian, about to shoot up an abortion clinic because he hates baby killing, or a Muslim about to shoot up any random public, or private facility to his liking because he hates every last thing about you?

I suspect your choice of sexual gratification is being ****** in the *** , as well I don't suspect you'll ever visit an abortion clinic anytime soon.


Muslims hate liberals. They hate liberals because liberals are Hollywood, liberals are the purveyors of porn, immorality, gay rights, LBGT rights etc.

Muslims hate conservatives too. They hate conservatives because we want to kill them.

They hate conservatives because we want to preserve the American way of life, which includes protecting you liberal nut jobs and your warped ideologies.
 
Last edited:
We had Second Thanksgiving yesterday. Mrs. F got a free turkey the day before Thanksgiving while picking up some groceries. Since our freezer recently **** the bed we had to allow it to thaw and use it, so.......2nd Thanksgiving. I'm a lucky, lucky man. Mmmmmmmm, turkey and stuffing!

We had lunch at an English pub. Killer fish and chips and a couple pints of Guiness. Then we bought our Christmas tree from a nice local guy who owns an outdoor market. We decorated it, built a roaring fire and watched Elf with the kids. It was a nice little Saturday.
 
My future son in law, a West Point grad, flew in from NY to ask me for my daughters hand in marriage last weekend. That's just not done too much anymore. I was truly impressed with this young man.
 
LOL. Trying to compare this lone nutjob living in a shack with the international radical Islamist movement.
 
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427886/planned-parenthood-shooting-christian-terrorism

In the wake of the Colorado Springs shooting, I read a great deal about so-called Christian terrorism from liberals. I don’t think they’ve thought this through. We’ve spent years hearing how associating Islam with terrorism is outrageous and bigoted. President Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton have all made the case that Islamic terrorism has “nothing whatsoever” — Clinton’s words — to do with Islam. President Obama insists the Islamic State “is not Islamic.” Even phrases such as “Muslim terrorism” are forbidden because they imply that Islam itself has something to do with terrorism. Better to talk about “death cults,” “violent extremism,” and criminals. And if you have to mention religion, make sure you adorn the word with lots of specific adjectives such as “radical” and “extremist,” or deploy euphemisms such as “jihadist.” Whether any of that is convincing is a topic for another time. Liberals insist they believe it to be true, and at least for argument’s sake, I’m happy to take them at their word.

So where is the condemnation of the phrase “Christian terrorism” (or, for that matter, “white terrorism”)? By all means, Christian leaders should denounce violent attacks on Planned Parenthood. But shouldn’t progressive leaders condemn any effort to tie Christianity with terrorism? Apparently not. It seems taking sides against Christianity is the progressive thing to do. It seems taking sides against Christianity is the progressive thing to do. In a famous speech at the National Prayer Breakfast this year, President Obama lectured Christian clergy not to get on their “high horse” about the atrocities committed by ISIS, given that Christians committed (allegedly) similar atrocities during the Crusades. It’s difficult to catalog all the flaws with this comparison, but one problem stands above all of the rest. By laying the Crusades at the feet of Christianity, Obama was unwittingly laying ISIS’s atrocities at Islam’s feet, at least rhetorically.

Consider that modern-day Council of Nicea, ABC’s The View. Joy Behar recently insisted concern over Muslim refugees was overblown. After all, Oklahoma City bomber “Timothy McVeigh was a Christian,” Behar said. “Just sayin’.” Whoopi Goldberg (no relation) concurred. “There have been a lot of monster Christians,” she said. “Hitler was a Christian.” Just for the record, Hitler detested Christianity, and McVeigh was an avowed agnostic who never cited Jesus as the inspiration for his crimes. Personally, I’m opposed to all such forms of guilt by association, but it seems obvious to me that contemporary Christianity is not struggling with a Crusades problem, while Islam is certainly struggling with a jihad problem. Psychologically, that jihad problem is the elephant in the room. It no doubt helps explain why Democratic and Republican leaders alike are eager to rhetorically separate Islam and Islamic terrorism. Obama even recently praised George W. Bush — calling that a rarity would be a grave understatement — for his effort to distinguish the majority of Muslims from the terrorist minority. And that is what responsible leaders should do. But if you are going to pursue this rhetorical path, some consistency would be nice.

Consider the question of motivations. The Obama administration often warns that insulting Islam — by burning Koran, drawing the prophet Mohammed, etc. — can invite a terrorist backlash and help Islamists win new recruits. Question: If Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, why would insulting Islam invite more terrorism? As secretary of state, Clinton worked assiduously to cast the attack on our compound in Benghazi, Libya, as nothing more than the reaction to an Internet video. After the recent Paris attacks, her successor momentarily admitted that he thought the terror attacks on the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo earlier this year had “legitimacy.” Kerry quickly corrected himself, saying that the attacks weren’t actually legitimate but that he could still see the “rationale” behind them. You will be hard-pressed to find any such rush to understanding when it comes to the so-called Christian terrorism in Colorado. And that’s because progressives, from the president down, are much more comfortable talking about the threat posed by the white Christian Americans who happen to vote Republican and oppose Planned Parenthood than they are discussing the threat from people determined to kill Americans.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427886/planned-parenthood-shooting-christian-terrorism
 
Elfie=libtard=idiot/liar
 
I never cared much for Guiness, as you almost have to chew it.
There is a place out here with great fish and chips though, combined with a pitcher of Kilt Lifter draft, yum!

The national forrest is allowing me to cut my own Christmas tree today. Fun family outing!
Will get back home in time for kickoff tonight.
 
I never cared much for Guiness, as you almost have to chew it.
There is a place out here with great fish and chips though, combined with a pitcher of Kilt Lifter draft, yum!

The national forrest is allowing me to cut my own Christmas tree today. Fun family outing!
Will get back home in time for kickoff tonight.

We will be cutting ours down after my son's basketball game. He scored 14 points in his game yesterday...4 3 pointers and a jump shot. Had some great assist and rebounds too. Proud mama.
 
I think all liberals should live under sharia law.You guys seem to embrace everything wicked and evil...enjoy! We can start with San Fransissyco. All of the Syrian ",cough,cough" refugees and only the Muslims shipped on in. We will take care of the Christians. That **** would be fun to watch. I'd get popped corn prop my feet up and watch the heads roll..
 
Screw this, I'm joining the church of the Fonz. All hail bishop Richie Cunningham!
 
...liberals. I don’t think they’ve thought this through.

"liberals" don't think anything through. They don't think. If they did think they would understand cause and effect, the reciprocal relationship of everything in the universe. Liberals operate in the toxic fog of 'group think', the blind obedience to 'ideology'.

One reasonably asks how 'liberals' and muzloids find any common ground, given that ultimately 'liberals' find themselves casualties of jihad. Neither think. Both are bound by ideology. Neither ideology is rational. 'liberals' are 'passive' to the point catastrophe. muzloids are violently aggressive to the point catastrophe. But they are united in hate. That is where you begin to see common behavior, the key objective being to destroy any and all forms of opposition.

Sane people would define peace as the absence of a threat. 'liberals' and muzloids, evidenced by their behavior define 'peace' as the absence of opposition. To the 'liberal' this means that all opposition to their ideology must be silenced, whether by the politics of personal destruction or by the gubmint fiat they have engineered to destroy institutions and liberties. muzloids are severely inbred and therefore just viscerally kill and destroy anything they view as an affront to their definition of peace, up until now, most prolifically their muzloid brethren. The entire history of islam stands as testimony.

If you follow the group think of these two herds, you see the collision course and the ultimate conflict that must play out. Obviously 'liberals' don't see this or they'd be running for their lives in the opposite direction. Rather, they show up to vehemently defend the "religious rights" of the same muzloids whose "religion" instructs them to kill liberals without mercy. Witness Bosnia. The Iron Curtain falls. Slavs are left with a green light to extract revenge for centuries of muzloid abuse. liberals shriek with indignation and we waste a bunch of assets in a fight we have no reason to be involved in. Yet muzloids slaughter millions around the world to this day and there isn't a peep. Now you have a "refugee crisis" resulting from liberal ideology destroying the peace in the ME, and it is "incumbent on us" to receive any and all "refugees" because it's the "right thing to do". Witness Paris and Berdoo.

If you project these circumstances on an unobstructed trajectory, you have Hijrah overrunning the US and liberals herded into camps for slaughter. Well, they'd keep the women and girls to sexually abuse to death like they have done everywhere else this has played out.

They haven't thought anything through.
 
I
I'm still waiting for one of you bigots to post a thread about this, of course since it's an inconvenient truth none of you will. I hinted at it by mentioning the war on women and telling you all religion is ****, but nobody bit.

You CONservatives are truly a pathetic bunch.

Here let me help you.....

Let's call this what it is: white christian terrorism.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/robert-lewis-dear-planned-parenthood_56600928e4b08e945fee21d0

Kind of a reach but I will give it to you. When the Arab limo driver shot up the LA Airport it wasn't terrorism. Nodal Hassan shooting up Firt Hood was work place violence. Did you say anything about those obvious terrorist incidents being mislabeled by both the Obama Regime and the MSM?
 
"liberals" don't think anything through. They don't think. If they did think they would understand cause and effect, the reciprocal relationship of everything in the universe. Liberals operate in the toxic fog of 'group think', the blind obedience to 'ideology'.

One reasonably asks how 'liberals' and muzloids find any common ground, given that ultimately 'liberals' find themselves casualties of jihad. Neither think. Both are bound by ideology. Neither ideology is rational. 'liberals' are 'passive' to the point catastrophe. muzloids are violently aggressive to the point catastrophe. But they are united in hate. That is where you begin to see common behavior, the key objective being to destroy any and all forms of opposition.

Sane people would define peace as the absence of a threat. 'liberals' and muzloids, evidenced by their behavior define 'peace' as the absence of opposition. To the 'liberal' this means that all opposition to their ideology must be silenced, whether by the politics of personal destruction or by the gubmint fiat they have engineered to destroy institutions and liberties. muzloids are severely inbred and therefore just viscerally kill and destroy anything they view as an affront to their definition of peace, up until now, most prolifically their muzloid brethren. The entire history of islam stands as testimony.

If you follow the group think of these two herds, you see the collision course and the ultimate conflict that must play out. Obviously 'liberals' don't see this or they'd be running for their lives in the opposite direction. Rather, they show up to vehemently defend the "religious rights" of the same muzloids whose "religion" instructs them to kill liberals without mercy. Witness Bosnia. The Iron Curtain falls. Slavs are left with a green light to extract revenge for centuries of muzloid abuse. liberals shriek with indignation and we waste a bunch of assets in a fight we have no reason to be involved in. Yet muzloids slaughter millions around the world to this day and there isn't a peep. Now you have a "refugee crisis" resulting from liberal ideology destroying the peace in the ME, and it is "incumbent on us" to receive any and all "refugees" because it's the "right thing to do". Witness Paris and Berdoo.

If you project these circumstances on an unobstructed trajectory, you have Hijrah overrunning the US and liberals herded into camps for slaughter. Well, they'd keep the women and girls to sexually abuse to death like they have done everywhere else this has played out.

They haven't thought anything through.

This is as rational of a discussion that I have seen, regarding the "Radical Muslim Issue". And Sam Harris does point to liberal duplicity in only making matters worse.(28:40) It is hour long, but well worth watching.


 
I

Kind of a reach but I will give it to you. When the Arab limo driver shot up the LA Airport it wasn't terrorism. Nodal Hassan shooting up Firt Hood was work place violence. Did you say anything about those obvious terrorist incidents being mislabeled by both the Obama Regime and the MSM?

Hypothetically, can we say that Muslim mass shootings are about equal in number with ones perpetrated white people but white people comprise about 70% of the population and Muslims about 2%? If only we had a professional actuary to make sense of my theory.
 
Hypothetically, can we say that Muslim mass shootings are about equal in number with ones perpetrated white people but white people comprise about 70% of the population and Muslims about 2%? If only we had a professional actuary to make sense of my theory.

I blame Ark.
 
I'm still waiting for one of you bigots to post a thread about this, of course since it's an inconvenient truth none of you will. I hinted at it by mentioning the war on women and telling you all religion is ****, but nobody bit.

You CONservatives are truly a pathetic bunch.

Here let me help you.....

Let's call this what it is: white christian terrorism.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/robert-lewis-dear-planned-parenthood_56600928e4b08e945fee21d0

go **** yourself elfy...when the left leaning media starts promoting Christian religions as Religions of Peace like they continually state about the hate filled Islamic goat *******, then a thread with your title would have meaning.....
 
go **** yourself elfy...when the left leaning media starts promoting Christian religions as Religions of Peace like they continually state about the hate filled Islamic goat *******, then a thread with your title would have meaning.....

The same to you.

Let me add that Christians in Africa have been responsible for mass murder that includes setting people on fire and hacking them to death.

If the benign Muslim has to own his wack jobs , then Christians have to own theirs.

It's not a question of numbers, it's the DELUSIONAL THINKING that is the problem.

The media NEVER calls out the real problem in the violent cases involving Islam or Christianity; RELIGION!

And you girly men who mention their meal time activities and Christmas trees;we get it.

You have no argument you can make so you have to resort to ******** on the chess board.
 
Top