Trump Address 07/16
- Thread starter BLITZ
- Start date
Whether a Republican, Democrat, or Independent, we should all want the same thing: the truth, accountability where wrongdoing is proven, and a commitment to follow the evidence wherever it leads. This holds true on every single post in the P&R forum.
The decision by these major networks to not broadcast the Presidential address is chilling in this respect, they are telling us that we are not smart enough to think for ourselves and make our own conclusions as to what we see and hear. They want us to rely on them to tell us what we should or should not believe. You can't hate them enough comes to mind.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,089
- Reaction score
- 7,001
- Points
- 113
What’s to explain? It was a complete waste of of time. No network should have covered it.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,281
- Reaction score
- 27,053
- Points
- 113
To you probs. To people that voted for him, it certainly was not
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,089
- Reaction score
- 7,001
- Points
- 113
Anyone grounded in reality knows it’s complete and utter nonsense. There no evidence. None.
"anyone grounded in reality"
LOL. you're not only a loser, you're a pfucking fool.
do splain why the narrative is slowly changing as people read the factual evidence.
oh, here's another trophy for your cuLt, Loser.
Your posts are still read even though it’s a complete waste of time.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,089
- Reaction score
- 7,001
- Points
- 113
What changing narrative?Factual evidence.
Trump telling Raffensperger to find 11,000 votes is factual evidence of attempted voter fraud. Fake electors is factual evidence of attempted voter fraud.
It's everyone's right to believe or not believe what Trump said on Thursday night, it's your choice.
But when networks refuse to cover Presidential speeches that choice is taken away from you and me.
It's almost like what fascists or communists would do.
But when networks refuse to cover Presidential speeches that choice is taken away from you and me.
It's almost like what fascists or communists would do.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,281
- Reaction score
- 27,053
- Points
- 113
100% agree. They call Trump what they are
I suppose you could argue that you could watch it on another network if you really wanted to see it, but I know quite a few people that don't have cable, satellite TV or a streaming service and still rely on a roof top antennae and local alphabet affiliates as their source of information.
Nice! Retards like shiny. I’m sure Flog appreciates it.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,281
- Reaction score
- 27,053
- Points
- 113
I didn't even know networks could refuse to air the Potus
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,281
- Reaction score
- 27,053
- Points
- 113
The majority of voters want 95% of what trump is doing. You clearly did not. No one is surprised at how you have reacted over the last few years.
Evidence is all over the place. Only libtard commies don’t acknowledge it.
Dims can’t win without cheating. They’ve gone full libtard.
You should probably research this one, Jizz.
Shove this up your azz, Flog
Alex Jones 
/ Floglofucktardcommie
/ Floglofucktardcommie
Sigh.
Factual evidence.
Trump telling Raffensperger to find 11,000 votes is factual evidence of attempted voter fraud. Fake electors is factual evidence of attempted voter fraud.
No, Trump did not try to commit fraud.
Read the actual transcript between Raffensperger and Trump.
Trump clearly pointed out to Raff where to look for those 11000 votes, he didn’t imply pulling them out of thin air you moron.