• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump supporting ethanol bothers me

Ethanol isn't much of a renewable.
Perfectly renewable. You can grow more of it every year. Just because it takes more energy to produce a gallon of ethanol than what a gallon of ethanol gives you in return is no reason not to subsidize something that helps us use less fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are the debbil. Whether or not something makes economic sense is irrelevant, isn't it?

It's just a give away to corn states.
You just don't like it because the corn states currently vote Republican. You're not fooling anyone.

 
Ethanol is racist.

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justin-taylor/ethanol-tortillas-and-minimum-wage/

Ethanol, Tortillas, and Minimum Wage

FEBRUARY 9, 2007 | Justin Taylor SHARE
Gene Veith points to a good lesson in economics:

Tortilla prices have doubled in Mexico, causing Mexico’s legions of poor people, who depend on tortillas as a major staple of their diet, to riot, destablize the government, and, one suspects, motivating more of them to illegally immigrate to the United States. Why are tortilla prices soaring? Because of the push in the U.S. to replace gasoline with ethanol.

The demand for ethanol, subsidized by the government at the rate of some 50 cents per gallon, has sent corn prices to the moon. This pleases the farm belt, of course, but the high corn prices are not only impacting tortillas, they will soon show up in higher meat prices. The tangled web of unintended consequences. . . .

Henry Hazlitt said it best in Economics In One Lesson:

“The bad economist sees only what immediately strikes the eye; the good economist also looks beyond. The bad economist sees only the direct consequences of a proposed course; the good economist looks also at the longer and indirect consequences. The bad economist sees only what the effect of a given policy has been or will be on one particular group; the good economist inquires also what the effect of the policy will be on all groups.”

“The whole of economics can be reduced to a single lesson, and that lesson can be reduced to a single sentence. The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or public policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”

Another application of Hazlitt’s principle is the enthusiasm for an increase in the minimum wage (recently passed), despite the fact that it increases unemployment. Sound economic principles are often counterintuitive and unpopular because they require taking into account long-term consequences.
 
Fossil fuels are the debbil.



This is why we vote


Ocasio-Cortez: 'There's no debate' that fossil fuel production should stop

Ocasio-Cortez, who is running to represent New York’s 14th Congressional District, has made no secret of her opposition to fossil fuels. She’s called for politicians to forsake donations from the industry and is pushing a “Green New Deal” plan which entails a shift to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035.

But she cast her position in stark terms Thursday, during a fundraiser at a restaurant along D.C.’s hip 14th Street.

“There’s no debate as to whether we should continue producing fossil fuels. There’s no debate. We should not,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “Every single scientific consensus points to that.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...ebate-that-fossil-fuel-production-should-stop
 
Top