- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,589
- Reaction score
- 29,951
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Leftists exist for a reason. All things exist for a reason. I have suspected for quite some time that the current, ugly, destructive version of leftists is to make their overwhelmingly defective appearance and intellect more mainstream, i.e., acceptable. That is why an obese woman is "beautiful," and Melania Trump ugly.
You think I am overstating this? The following is from somebody deemed a "leader" in modern education, a professor at Columbia:
http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed...m01/£Antiracist£-Grading-Starts-with-You.aspx
This is actually going on in our schools. Terms such as "cisgender" and "discriminatory" and "aggressively competitive" have replaced correct from incorrect, accurate from inaccurate - even in math, which is a binary, cisgendered, antiquated, male-aggressive remnant from our dark past.
Okay, maybe planes fall out of the sky and bridges collapse and medicines fail and the electric grid fails because the world does not care about your stupidity, but so what? A few thousand people die, maybe a couple million, but the world is soooo much better because non-binary ze's finally earn an "A" in progressive math.
You think I am overstating this? The following is from somebody deemed a "leader" in modern education, a professor at Columbia:
How can grading practices support students who fell behind during the recent closures?
First, I want to challenge the assumption of your question—the term "fall behind" is a social construct. This idea of where a person should be is not a naturally occurring thing. We know from child development psychologist Jean Piaget that all people develop differently and grow at different paces.
Essentially, powerful teaching and learning are based on two things: assessment and intervention. When we meet students this fall, how will we most honestly and mindfully assess them and understand where they are? And then how will we move kids forward at a rate that's developmentally appropriate to them?
[So a child who is 18 months old and unable to sit upright or speak a syllable is not falling behind, and instead is a victim of the white patriarchy? And an 8-year old unable to say the alphabet or do single-column addition is not falling behind and instead is just learning at his own rate? Could be. Or maybe the kid is falling behind.]
What are the most pernicious grading practices in use today?
Pernicious grading practices start out as pernicious pedagogy. I cannot separate grading practices from pedagogy, and I cannot separate pedagogy from the history of classism, sexism, racism, and ableism in the United States. The idea of what is successful at school is still very much constructed through an able-bodied, monied, aggressively competitive white male lens.
[Says a guy teaching at Columbia apparently unaware that the most successful students today are Asian, and that females are doing much better in schools today than males, and who suggests that those with a physical disability are stupid and incapable of learning. "They system favors white males who are actually Asians and females! Aaaaahaahahahah!!!!]
How would doing that inner work change grading practices?
One thing we understand from Universal Design for Learning is that there are multiple ways a kid can express their knowing. And so if you know 2+2=4, one way you can express your knowing is by writing it. Another way you can express your knowing is by discussing it. A third way is by creating a model that shows it. A fourth way is by illustrating it and a fifth way is by performing a play. But in too many schools, only one way is considered legitimate. So if you write it, you get an A and that's it. There might be 100 kids in the school who know 2+2=4, but if only two of those kids can write it, then only two of those kids will receive As. That is profoundly discriminatory.
[Seriously, a Columbia professor wags his finger and says that requiring a student to write the correct answer to a math question is "discriminatory." I guess all questions are in effect "discriminatory," as they discriminate between those who know the answer or how to derive the correct answer from those who don't.]
http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed...m01/£Antiracist£-Grading-Starts-with-You.aspx
This is actually going on in our schools. Terms such as "cisgender" and "discriminatory" and "aggressively competitive" have replaced correct from incorrect, accurate from inaccurate - even in math, which is a binary, cisgendered, antiquated, male-aggressive remnant from our dark past.
Okay, maybe planes fall out of the sky and bridges collapse and medicines fail and the electric grid fails because the world does not care about your stupidity, but so what? A few thousand people die, maybe a couple million, but the world is soooo much better because non-binary ze's finally earn an "A" in progressive math.