if you want star power dont look at our wr room.. We got 2 guys and Roman Wilson.. Not much after that.
Do you sit down when you pee?It isn't your opinions so much as the manner in which you feel you need to provide them. Do you drive a luxury car?
Ok dude. The number one ability is availability. Rodgers missed one game with a fractured arm. He played the rest with a cast. His numbers were every bit as good per game then both those guys. He had a passer rating above 90 and 3-1 td to Int. And he's not playing with the targets the other two have by any means.Lol...Lamar and Burrows were hurt for huge amounts of the season. And Rodgers miss open guys weekly. Open guys in the NFL usually have guys close to them. It isn't college football where guys run free wirh no defender within yards routinely. Even when guys did get that open Rodgers probably missed more than he hit. Seems you have some selective memory going on here. Maybe you are remembering Rodgers lone SB appearance.![]()
![]()
His run D still is top notch. The problem is scheme, 2 DL ain't cutting it against heavy running teams
Thank you for proving my point. You must be projecting.Do you sit down when you pee
So availability is the number one ability.....ahh...ok.Ok dude. The number one ability is availability. Rodgers missed one game with a fractured arm. He played the rest with a cast. His numbers were every bit as good per game then both those guys. He had a passer rating above 90 and 3-1 td to Int. And he's not playing with the targets the other two have by any means.
I know but blaming him for last year mediocre run D is bullshitCam is aging out. Father Time has yet to be defeated. One can only hope they install a new scheme and that Cam can benefit from that change. It’s not a proven and it is a younger man’s sport.
Cam is nearing his value at a depth player. If he plays this whole season, I will be surprised.
Remember that old saying, better to cut ties a year early than to keep a year to long.
We are forced to keep Cam due to previous coaching and under developing of players to replace him.
Salute the nation
Salute the nation
Except vs the playoff teams, we beat 1 playoff team, DK is better than anyone Baltimore has.Ok dude. The number one ability is availability. Rodgers missed one game with a fractured arm. He played the rest with a cast. His numbers were every bit as good per game then both those guys. He had a passer rating above 90 and 3-1 td to Int. And he's not playing with the targets the other two have by any means.
PFF stats should never be used to support an argument IMHHO. Sorry, I'm usually on board with your opinions but having gone down a rabbit hole in regards to PFF data gathering, their off the wall approach is comical to me. I'm currently a data architect by trade, and I'm building a large model to gather compliance information against our enterprise security stack. If I chose the same approach as PFF I'd be sending out surveys to engineers and contractors on their opinions to oddly generated categories instead of using hard fast data on key indices.Heyward was the top rated IDL per PFF this year, and while I can't see the grade splits, his overall 90+ grade could not be possible without a high run defense grade.
Still has his taint. My cousin worked for them for years. It is a bit of a cult.Lol, that's exactly what PFF grades by -- the eye test, on every single play with multiple analysts. Do you analyze Heyward's every play on the All-22 every week?
And Lebanon, Cris is the majority owner of PFF, he's not grading players and it's unlikely he's giving marching orders based on biases like Dr. Evil with a whiny southern drawl, that's crazy fan talk.
One single talent gets doubled and there isn't a hell of a lot left. Calvin Austin, the backs which he got the most out of and Muth who the offense didn't allow throws to. He exceeded anyone's possible expectations.Except vs the playoff teams, we beat 1 playoff team, DK is better than anyone Baltimore has.
An all pro isn't worth **** on the sidelines.So availability is the number one ability.....ahh...ok.![]()
I know but blaming him for last year mediocre run D is bullshit
Rodgers? He did exactly what everyone thought he/we would, get to 9 or 10 wins, get smashed in the playoffs. We did ok vs the non-playoff teams and not so well vs the playoff teams. He had a lower passer rating than Russell Wilson did here, and Wilson didn't have the 4th highest paid WR in the NFL either.One single talent gets doubled and there isn't a hell of a lot left. Calvin Austin, the backs which he got the most out of and Muth who the offense didn't allow throws to. He exceeded anyone's possible expectations.
But Pickens is at least as good if not better dso he had a similar WR availableRodgers? He did exactly what everyone thought he/we would, get to 9 or 10 wins, get smashed in the playoffs. We did ok vs the non-playoff teams and not so well vs the playoff teams. He had a lower passer rating than Russell Wilson did here, and Wilson didn't have the 4th highest paid WR in the NFL either.
Pickens in this system wasn't any better, and I'd say worse because of his attitude, but Gainwell was better than anyone we had with Wilson. Don't get me wrong if someone said, you have one game to win, who are you taking Rodgers or Wilson, I'm taking Rodgers, but Rodgers did nothing that wasn't expected here, like I said 9 or 10 wins, get smashed in the first playoff game.But Pickens is at least as good if not better dso he had a similar WR available
Rodgers? He did exactly what everyone thought he/we would, get to 9 or 10 wins, get smashed in the playoffs. We did ok vs the non-playoff teams and not so well vs the playoff teams. He had a lower passer rating than Russell Wilson did here, and Wilson didn't have the 4th highest paid WR in the NFL either.
if you want star power dont look at our wr room.. We got 2 guys and Roman Wilson.. Not much after that.
PFF stats should never be used to support an argument IMHHO. Sorry, I'm usually on board with your opinions but having gone down a rabbit hole in regards to PFF data gathering, their off the wall approach is comical to me. I'm currently a data architect by trade, and I'm building a large model to gather compliance information against our enterprise security stack. If I chose the same approach as PFF I'd be sending out surveys to engineers and contractors on their opinions to oddly generated categories instead of using hard fast data on key indices.