Probably takesTE off the board.
Lol we did it again, same time. Mods can remove mine
Probably takesTE off the board.
Great minds think alike!Lol we did it again, same time. Mods can remove mine
Good with me. I didn't think it was ever a possibility, but the thought of taking a No. 2 TE at 32 or even 49 wasn't something I wanted to see happen. Gentry is solid and should be very affordable.
Probably takesTE off the board.
Actually surprised it's only a 1 year deal. He is a good No. 2 guy to Muuth. He blocks well and can get out in space and catch the ball.
I'm noticing a trend with these contracts. Stars are getting 4-6 years. Solid players around 3-year deals, and role players/backups 1-2 year deals.I think with young Hayward, they want to see what his role will be as opposed to Gentry’s 1yr VS long term.
Salute the nation
good news!Yup, TE won't be touched in Day 1 or 2. Possible on Day 3, but now more unlikely.
One of my big 5 I wanted to retain.
Just did a Quick Slant and @KStilley gets his question answered!
We can't stand Pat. A good move it was!I was hoping he'd come back. Has improved over time. Good signing. Friermuth, Gentry and Heyward..... good to go. Now no need to waste a pick on a TE. Got other needs to fill.
It's a TE rich class. If they had a full compliment of picks I wouldn't have minded getting one but I'm ok with Gentry. Big dude good blocker.
I think with young Hayward, they want to see what his role will be as opposed to Gentry’s 1yr VS long term.
Salute the nation
That is why I was a little concerned about the position… this is a nice deep draft and I don’t think that would have worked out for us because i fear if they start seriously looking at the position, there is some guy they are gonna just fall in love with and then overdraft him and that stunts us elsewhere….
All we needed was a blocker who can competently run some routes on occasion … while Washington or his ilk are tempting.. the last thing we need is spending a first or second on another TE and letting depth at a more important position starve because of that
I couldn't agree more but if they had the full compliment you might have gotten an upgrade back up with starter capability in the fourth. Apparently deepest TE draft in a long time.That is why I was a little concerned about the position… this is a nice deep draft and I don’t think that would have worked out for us because i fear if they start seriously looking at the position, there is some guy they are gonna just fall in love with and then overdraft him and that stunts us elsewhere….
All we needed was a blocker who can competently run some routes on occasion … while Washington or his ilk are tempting.. the last thing we need is spending a first or second on another TE and letting depth at a more important position starve because of that