• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

😂 Nobody else talking about the Covid Vaccine, carrying grudges and being indignant but you loonies. I have no problem waiting for something I know ain’t gonna happen and mocking you all the while.
One of these days you won’t be posting anymore and we will know that it’s because you succumbed to too many clot shots that you swallowed like a truck stop *****.
 
… another study that is not proof of a causal relationship. The authors words.

And I wait.

... adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines on menstrual characteristics are well documented

No amount of evidence, documentation, studies, testimonials, proof will sway you from your position. We all know you don't follow science, you follow ideology.
 
Just damn. More turbo cancer evidence?

People who received three or more mRNA Covid shots died much more quickly of pancreatic cancer than those who did not, Japanese researchers have found.

The results remained statistically significant after adjusting for the severity of the cancer and the treatments the patients had undergone. The researchers suggested an unusual immune change from the mRNA shots might make the tumors spread faster.

Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study​


Results: The overall survival (OS) of PC patients was shortened in those vaccinated three times or more, and the total serum IgG4 levels increased with the number of vaccinations. Of note, OS was significantly shorter in the high IgG4 group, and Foxp3-positive cells in the tumor tissues were increased. Repeated vaccinations increased the spike-specific IgG4 levels, and a positive correlation was observed between spike-specific IgG4 and the total IgG4. Conclusions: These findings highlight repeated vaccination as a poor prognostic factor in PC patients and suggest that IgG4 is induced by repeated vaccination and may be associated with a poor prognosis in these patients.
 
I'll ask again:

Flogtard, do you get paid or otherwise compensated by those promoting the Covid shots?
 
One of these days you won’t be posting anymore and we will know that it’s because you succumbed to too many clot shots that you swallowed like a truck stop *****.
😂 Now YOU have to wait.

How are you so familiar with what’s happening at truck stops? You paying, or getting paid or just making “friends”?
 
No amount of evidence, documentation, studies, testimonials, proof will sway you from your position. We all know you don't follow science, you follow ideology.
The author literally stated that the study didn’t prove anything and even offered a very reasonable alternative explanation. You don’t follow reality, let alone science, you follow ideology.
 
The author literally stated that the study didn’t prove anything and even offered a very reasonable alternative explanation. You don’t follow reality, let alone science, you follow ideology.
no linky linky, McDipshit. Why didn't you provide the link to where you were told your opinion?
 
906 pages filled with hundreds of current links, yet one individual remains obstinate, refusing to give an inch or concede anything.
Seems passive-aggressive to me, but what do I know, I admit that I don't know everything.
 
IT
WAS
IN
TIM’S
LINK
Trump voter

Simple Summary​

Repeated COVID-19 vaccination is known to increase spike-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and there are concerns regarding its impact on cancer immunity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between repeated COVID-19 vaccination and prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). The study findings were that repeated COVID-19 booster vaccinations are associated with poorer overall survival in patients with PC. Notably, our analysis reveals that high levels of IgG4, induced by vaccination, correlate with a detrimental prognosis in these patients. These insights provide essential information regarding the interplay between vaccination and cancer progression, which has significant implications for patient management strategies. Our study highlights the necessity for ongoing research into the long-term effects of mRNA vaccinations on cancer prognosis, which remains a pressing concern in the evolving landscape of public health and cancer treatment.

Conclusions​

Repeated vaccination is a poor prognostic factor in PC patients. Repeated vaccination increased the serum total and spike-specific IgG4 levels, which may be associated with a poor prognosis.

Correction Statement​

This article has been republished with a minor correction to the supplemental data. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

no, it wasnt.
 
The author literally stated that the study didn’t prove anything and even offered a very reasonable alternative explanation. You don’t follow reality, let alone science, you follow ideology.

Pfizer and Moderna can't PROVE that the vaccines don't kill people either. All scientific research is full of caveats. That doesn't mean there isn't a correlation. As I posted it, it is a preliminary analysis and warrants further study based on the observations of researchers and scientists.

At least from June 2021, SCs per 1000 women were considerably lower for women who were vaccinated, compared to those that were unvaccinated, before SC. Furthermore, SC rates for the vaccinated group were much lower than expected based on their proportion of the total population.
throughout 2022, SC rates remained about 1.5 times higher for women that were unvaccinated before SC compared with those that were vaccinated before SC
our current real-world population data from the Czech Republic indicated that COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a substantial and sustained decrease in SC rate compared to non-vaccinated women.

Conclusion​

We conclude that at least from June 2021, SC rates in the Czech Republic for women vaccinated against COVID-19 before SC were substantially lower than for those who were unvaccinated before SC. These hypothesis-generating and preliminary results call for further studies of the influence of COVID-19 vaccination on human fecundability and fertility.

The author provided alternative explanation, then explained why that alternative explanation wasn't plausible.

While the strength of our study is its nationwide unselected sample of fertile women, the observed association between decreased SC rates and COVID-19 vaccination is, of course, not proof of a causal relationship between vaccination and fecundability. For example, it is possible that more women who wished to become pregnant, that is, achieve SC, chose not to be vaccinated, and/or that more women who did not plan to become pregnant opted for vaccination. Indeed, such self-selection bias is compatible with the increase in SCs of the women unvaccinated before SC in the second half of 2021 (Figure 1(b)). However, to defer vaccination was against sanctioned national public recommendations in the Czech Republic at the time, and if this type of self-selection bias had been the predominant underlying factor for the observed reduction in SC rates in vaccinated women, the total fertility rate for the entire population would have remained relatively constant throughout the study period. In contrast, the total fertility rate in the Czech Republic decreased from 1.83 births per 1000 women in 2021, to 1.62 in 2022, and 1.45 in 2023, and, therefore, self-selection bias does not seem to fully explain the observed association between vaccination status and SC rates. Notably, we and others have previously found a batch-dependent safety signal for the Comirnaty vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Sweden, and the US, and the possibility of a disproportionate influence of early batches of this vaccine on SC rates remains to be investigated.

Signals abound. You would vote for turning a blind eye instead of the researcher/scientist calls for further investigation.
 
Pfizer and Moderna can't PROVE that the vaccines don't kill people either. All scientific research is full of caveats. That doesn't mean there isn't a correlation. As I posted it, it is a preliminary analysis and warrants further study based on the observations of researchers and scientists.
There are billions of vaccinated people alive and well.
 
There are billions of vaccinated people alive and well.
That statement is the definition of burying your head in the sand. Yes, you are correct but there are also huge numbers of reports of people who have varying degrees of issues and injuries likely from the vaccine and enough have been proven that any other vaccine ever released would have been pulled or heavily restricted for further study at this point. I just don't get your religious devotion to something that isn't doing what it was intended to do and is likely doing more harm than good to the vast majority. You should at the very least be willing to say we should stop and do some actual research.
 
That statement is the definition of burying your head in the sand. Yes, you are correct but there are also huge numbers of reports of people who have varying degrees of issues and injuries likely from the vaccine and enough have been proven that any other vaccine ever released would have been pulled or heavily restricted for further study at this point. I just don't get your religious devotion to something that isn't doing what it was intended to do and is likely doing more harm than good to the vast majority. You should at the very least be willing to say we should stop and do some actual research.
Flog:


Bye,bye.jpg
 
Top