- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
And Joe Kent.
Iran
- Thread starter BLITZ
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2023
- Messages
- 2,233
- Reaction score
- 2,139
- Points
- 113
If you look at Kent’s past tweets, it seems obvious that his kids or somebody made him step down.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
And you root for “No New Wars” Dear Leader regardless of his idiotic decisions. Go ahead, show me where you criticized Trump when he campaigned on “No New Wars”. I’ll wait. Until then, you’re in a cult.
You're infamous for quoting people who never said the things you claim they did.
Go find a single post where I rooted for no new wars, or criticized him for no new wars.
You need to up your dosages.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,031
- Reaction score
- 17,134
- Points
- 113
You are a fuucking liar:
Hungary Howls as Ukraine Strikes Key Pipeline
Ukraine has struck the Druzhba pipeline carrying Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia, even as widening attacks indicating the war is spreading to the Eurasian landmass.
Hungary has accused Ukraine of disrupting oil supplies it gets from Russia and has stationed troops at critical energy facilities across the country as Prime Minister Viktor Orban ramps up the rhetoric around energy and national security ahead of parliamentary elections in April.
Orban on Wednesday accused Kyiv of imposing an “oil blockade” on Hungary by delaying the reopening of the Druzhba pipeline which supplies it, and neighboring Slovakia, with Russian oil.
Ukraine shut the pipeline a month ago, saying a Russian strike had damaged it, but Hungary’s leader accused Kyiv of deliberately keeping the pipeline closed for “political” rather than “technical” reasons.
“The Ukrainian government is exerting pressure on the Hungarian and Slovak governments through an oil blockade,” Orban said in a video on X following a meeting of the Hungarian Defence Council on Wednesday.
“They will not stop there,” he claimed, adding: “They are preparing further actions to disrupt Hungary’s energy system,” without further details or evidence.
Orban said he had “ordered the strengthening of the protection for critical energy infrastructure. That means that soldiers and the necessary equipment to repel potential attacks will be deployed near key energy facilities.”
“The police will also patrol with increased forces around designated power plants, distribution stations and control centers,” he said. Drones were also banned in the north-east border region with Ukraine.
Ukraine has not publicly responded to the accusations and CNBC has contacted the country’s foreign ministry for a response.
The ramping up of rhetoric around energy and national security, and an increase in anti-Ukraine sentiment, comes as Hungary’s leadership fights to stay in power ahead of a parliamentary election in April.
Orban’s right-wing Fidesz party is trailing in most independent polls while former party insider and center-right challenger, Peter Magyar, is leading voter surveys ahead of the April 12 vote.
Your new hero - like Liz Cheney who wasn't till she was - is now Joe Kent, who wasn't till he was.
You forget
We are doomed. I pray for our children and theirs.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,823
- Reaction score
- 6,393
- Points
- 113
Nice retort. Very classy.
The article you're referencing is from last year, August 2025, an entirely different scenario than the Russian missile attack on the pipeline in January of this year. You've crossed your wires up a bit. You can apologize if you want to, I doubt that you will.
It seems rather strange why - in the middle of the Iran crisis thread - you're suddenly concerned about the state of Hungarian energy and politics, and the fate of a notorious liar and propagandist in the death throes of losing his grip on power. It's even stranger why you concern yourself with two tiny central European countries, the only two, who are still sucking the teat of Russian oil, when multiple alternatives are readily available to them, as they've been for years. The fact the leaders of Hungary, and to a lesser extent Slovakia, two of the most corrupt nations in the EU, are connected at the hip to Putin, has been an open secret for over a decade. The fact Orban carries Putin's water in the EU, subverting the alliance at every turn, is also no secret. The hope is, that in three short weeks in the general election, Hungarians will toss Orban on the trash pile of history. One of the dirtiest, most traitorous and corrupt politicians this country has ever had. Of course, much like Putin, he too is the sitting U.S. President's BFF. Some things never change.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
Your reading comprehension sucks.
You rooted for Trump, proof of past criticism for his “No New Wars” campaign is literally what I just asked of you.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
I support people who expose attempted insurrection and lies about the cause of a war. You support attempted insurrection and being lied to about the cause of a war.
And “No New Wars” Trump changed, Dim.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 23,570
- Reaction score
- 28,337
- Points
- 113
The ignorance is astounding. How some people make it through life being this stupid and gullible is beyond me,but here we are.
you never answered me - are you ok with an extreme Muslim nuclear Iran quite literally next door to where you live, you work, your kids go to school and play?
<<sigh>> Son, provide a link. Just one that shows I "rooted for no new wars".
You're so beaten down of late, you're left to just making **** up.
No son, rooting for Trump doesn't equate supporting 100% of his quotes, statements, and platform.
Again, I repeat - "Son, provide a link. Just one that shows I "rooted for no new wars"."
You don't support whistleblowers in MN
You don't support anyone who exposed Biden's use of auto pen
You don't support anyone who exposed Hunter's business dealings & influence peddling
You didn't support anyone exposing information that Biden's horrible Afghanistan withdrawal plan led to 13 American deaths
You didn't support anyone exposing information showing Democrats intentionally opened our borders to increase the Dem voting base
You didn't support anyone exposing information showing voting failures in the 2020 election
You don't support anyone exposing information that pharmas are violating trials, falsifying data, bribing officials
You don't support anyone exposing the tremendous fraud with our BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars sent to Ukraine
You didn't support anyone exposing information when the IRS was targeting Conservatives under Obama
You didn't support anyone sharing information about Benghazi implicating Hilldabeast
You didn't support anyone sharing any information implicating Obama for Fast & Furious
You didn't support anyone sharing information about the NSA's mass surveillance of Americans under Obama
You didn't support those sharing information about Obama's illegal drone strikes program that also killed Americans
You didn't support those leaking info about Obama seizing AP journalists phone records
You didn't support those leaking info about detainee treatment at Guantánamo under Obama
You don't support anyone that brings forth negative information about the trans community or trans mutiliation
You don't support anyone sharing information about the damages of illegal immigration or about illegal immigrants in any way
You don't support anyone exposing information about the fraud involved with climate change/global warming/whatever it's now called
But you do support people exposing information when it suits your political scalp hunt.
We all see your selective outrage.
117th request - provide quotes v making **** up.
This is worthy of pasting the full text in the post since Flogtard won't open it. He won't read any of this either, but some of you will.
𝗝𝗢𝗘 𝗞𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗦𝗡'𝗧 𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗠. 𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗦𝗡'𝗧 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗗.
Joe Kent spent today telling the world that Iran posed no imminent threat and that Israel manipulated Trump into war. There's one devastating problem: an intelligence official confirmed to The Daily Wire that Kent was not part of the planning of the Iran war or the briefings on the war.
He wasn't read in. He didn't see the intelligence. He was operating blind — and he wrote a resignation letter as if he had the full picture.
Speaker Mike Johnson made it plain. 𝘐 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴. 𝘞𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘦 𝘒𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴𝘯'𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴, 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺.
It gets worse. A senior administration official told Fox News that Kent was a known leaker who had been cut out of the president's intelligence briefings months ago. He wasn't a whistleblower with inside knowledge. He was already on the outside looking in — and the administration knew it.
This explains everything. Kent didn't resign because he saw something alarming in the classified record. He resigned because he 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗮𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱. He dressed up his ideological opposition to the war in the language of intelligence expertise he didn't actually have.
And CNN, MSNBC, and the rest treated it as a bombshell from a senior insider.
The media ran with the hand grenade. They didn't bother to check whether it had a pin.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
Where does he mention an imminent threat?
AND why was Trump taking advise from his son-in-law?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
And it makes sense to you that he wasn’t in the room?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
Silence equals acquiescence. Show me just one that shows you supported a war with Iran prior to Israel telling us we needed to do it.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,337
- Reaction score
- 6,813
- Points
- 113
An unhinged long list of deflections! I LOVE IT!!!!
1. Because he was in on meetings and was thus in the know.
2. Jared's in the know.
it makes sense to me since as the text that you didnt read states he was a known leaker.
if you intend to keep something secret, you tend to not let those who have proven the inability to retain a secret as a secret from knowing.
Another convenient cop out when you get your *** handed too you! LOVE IT!!!!