Hey, Supe. Thanks for the civil, measured response.
well, you certainly managed to downplay a fervent Muslim country with deep oil pockets seeking to establish itself as a major player in the nuclear world, and discard any nervousness that could result from that. As has been shown - this current regime that you romanticize as remaining intact and able to continue operating, has been the driver behind numerous terror attacks across the world. It shouldn't even take a double digit IQ to imagine what would happen if they were to have their own nukes.
Here is Trump's Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, from today's hearing on the Hill.
In a written version of her opening statement, Gabbard said Iran's nuclear enrichment program had been "obliterated" in 2025 strikes, and that the regime had not resumed enrichment activities.
Seems pretty clear to me. Netanyahu evidently convinced Trump otherwise, and spooked him into action.
In response to this quip, "this current regime that you romanticize as remaining intact and able to continue operating," I'm not romanticizing anything. I'd love to see this brutal Iranian regime overthrown, with a return to some semblance of democracy, and normalcy, for the once, mostly secular Persian nation, before they were overrun by fanatical Muslims.
I am simply pointing out two things... that to this day, missiles and drones continue to land in Israel and neighboring states, as the Iranians decentralized military command years ago, preparing for such an invasion. And the Straight of Hormuz is under constant threat, completely shutting down safe passage for US & allied tankers and cargo ships. This is obviously untenable.
As far as the Iranian regime "remaining intact," I'm not saying that, Tulsi Gabbard is.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told senators that the Iranian regime "appears to be intact but largely degraded" by ongoing U.S. and Israeli strikes.
Largely degraded? Yes. Appears to be intact? Yes.
There's much more heavy lifting to do, likely including boots on the ground, if Trump truly wants to root out this regime once and for all.
He would have been much better off building a coalition within NATO beforehand, bringing allies onboard, as was done in Iraq and Afghanistan, then proceed with military operations. Now he's looking like a fool, trying to drum up help and support after the fact, particularly after he's spent months on end mocking, insulting and infuriating our allies across the pond with his reckless, bellicose comments.
I pray, for the whole lot of us, that he's somehow able to regain control of the situation and see things through, to avoid the plethora of negative outcomes that military and foreign policy experts have been pontificating on for years, if not decades.