- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,845
- Reaction score
- 18,393
- Points
- 113
informed consent:
informed consent:
Canadian non-governmental Inquiry has started. Here is one MD:
He literally just stated you all agree that the vaccine was good for high risk people. At some point y’all need to come to terms with the fact that you don’t have any idea what you’re trying to argue.Now?
There are 1000 pages in this thread.
I’m sure that this was not the first time that someone mentioned that the data was flawed.
He literally just stated you all agree that the vaccine was good for high risk people. At some point y’all need to come to terms with the fact that you don’t have any idea what you’re trying to argue.
you're slow *** is why Jesus isn't coming back anytime soon.He literally just stated you all agree that the vaccine was good for high risk people. At some point y’all need to come to terms with the fact that you don’t have any idea what you’re trying to argue.
So the data wasn’t so flawed that it couldn’t be determined that the vaccine is “better” for the high risk population and ONLY the high risk population?we've all long said that the vaccine that isnt a vaccine for everyone would be better for the high risk population. as you so ignorantly pointed out, 900 pages later, that is the elderly, morbidly obese and immunity challenged.
that does not include every single person.
So it’s only good for the high risk population, it’s bad for everyone else because some might get an adverse reaction that the high risk population doesn’t get for some reason? And the adverse reactions are worse than Covid as they have higher morbidity and mortality rates?the holy clot shot was pushed onto the entire population. as you so vividly recall. not everyone needed to take it as it has been shown to cause adverse reactions in a percent of the population. something about the medical profession says to "do no harm" - yet this shot did just that to some people.
the mere fact that this was pushed onto 100% of the population as some one-size fits all holy treatment doesn't light up any electrical activity in your brain?So the data wasn’t so flawed that it couldn’t be determined that the vaccine is “better” for the high risk population and ONLY the high risk population?
So it’s only good for the high risk population, it’s bad for everyone else because some might get an adverse reaction that the high risk population doesn’t get for some reason? And the adverse reactions are worse than Covid as they have higher morbidity and mortality rates?
Please do share the study with these conclusions.
You are making a YUGE assumption that there are any synapses firing in that particular cranium.the mere fact that this was pushed onto 100% of the population as some one-size fits all holy treatment doesn't light up any electrical activity in your brain?
Right, you struggle to understand why vaccination rates matter, like MMR for example.the mere fact that this was pushed onto 100% of the population as some one-size fits all holy treatment doesn't light up any electrical activity in your brain?
Just curious. Why do MMR shots not require boosters and the COVID vax does?Right, you struggle to understand why vaccination rates matter, like MMR for example.
Well, you could do a simple google search and learn why the Covid, flu and tdap vaccines among others, require boosters, or you can remain a low information individual waiting for Joe Rogan to tell you that it’s a Big Pharma scam.Just curious. Why do MMR shots not require boosters and the COVID vax does?
And for OFTB:
Ok Thanks!Well, you could do a simple google search and learn why the Covid, flu and tdap vaccines among others, require boosters, or you can remain a low information individual waiting for Joe Rogan to tell you that it’s a Big Pharma scam.