The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

[Steelworth]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Really? I'll just pretend I didn't see all those Ivanka nipple shot posts on here.

You saying the first lady flaunts her **** like she's at a wet t-shirt contest and also looks like an alien from outer space is a little different than a couple guys talking about seeing silhouette nipple on Ivanka in a business dress.

Get real.

 

[Tibs]

is it better to "look" Presidential or get **** done? FORMER President Obama looked Presidential and did an absolutely terrible job of being President. President Trump rarely looks or acts Presidential yet in spite of the democrats fighting every step of the way, has done a hell of a lot better job being President

I partially agree with you. I will say if Trump dialed it back even a little, he'd get a lot more people on his side, would improve his reelection chances and also wouldn't seem like he's a missed dose of Xanax away from being committed to a mental health facility. That's all. But yes, results do outweigh whatever perception people have of you, and the economy is strong, no doubt about that.

 

[Hypocycloids]

Brit news covering it have the best pics, imagine that

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-just-hours-start-Trumps-military-parade.html

lookit at all those red hats!

4 more years!

4 more years!

 

[CharlesDavenport]

Taking what shots? Making what **** up?

1. Trump slipped up and mentioned 'airports' during the Revolutionary War. I didn't even catch it watching live, just thought the memes today were pretty funny. No big deal.
2. Melania flaunts her **** like she entered a post-event wet t-shirt contest, and happens to look like an alien from another universe, and we can't bring that up? Is that taboo around here?

Whatever that moral outrage you imagined was the made up ****. Anyway, yes those are stupid criticisms and it's typical of everything we hear from the left after a fantastic speech. Also, if Melania looks like an alien, call me Captain Kirk.

 

[Vincent]

Most importantly, we got to - yet again - gawk at the First Lady's nipples.

Weaponized Melania.

 

[Spike]

The outrage was all for naught, the frothing at the mouth, hysterical Dems were made to look like complete fools! LOL


Trump made his critics look small during his ‘Salute to America’

Of all the stupid freak-outs we have experienced since Trump was elected, the hyperventilation over his Fourth of July address and celebration on the Mall may be the stupidest.

His critics called his decision to insert himself into the Independence Day celebrations virtually unprecedented. Sorry, but Trump is not the first U.S. president to give a major speech on the Fourth of July. Harry S. Truman once delivered an Independence Day address in front of the Washington monument. Presidents Woodrow Wilson, John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all gave Fourth of July addresses from Independence Hall in Philadelphia. And, in 1986, Ronald Reagan delivered a Fourth of July address from the deck of an aircraft carrier, the USS John F. Kennedy, strategically placed in front of the Statue of Liberty.

Trump’s address took this tradition to new heights. Democrats complained before the speech that Trump was politicizing the Fourth of July. He did nothing of the sort.

In a speech reminiscent of his outstanding remarks last month at Normandy, Trump delivered a soaring presidential address — a celebration of the greatness of our country. “As we gather this evening, in the joy of freedom, we remember that we all share a truly extraordinary heritage,” Trump said. “Together, we are part of one of the greatest stories ever told — the story of America.”

Millions of ordinary Americans who tuned in to watch must have been wondering what the fuss was all about. Democrats promised they would witness a partisan address. But instead, they saw the president deliver a deeply unifying speech that celebrated America’s accomplishments, and the courage of our men and women in uniform.

With each passing minute, the president looked larger while his critics looked increasingly petty and small.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.02bd27a86080

From The Washington Post? Ouch.

Petty and small, sums up the libtards perfectly LOL

 

[Hypocycloids]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Really? I'll just pretend I didn't see all those Ivanka nipple shot posts on here. Nah, that never happened. LOL.

Yeah really. You're a petty idiot.

Um you know it rained right? And you know she got caught in it right? Look at the pic you posted. Look at her hair. Wet tops do strange things to nipples if you already didn't know.

You're a petty idiot.
Soon you'll be going on another rant trying to convince us how you're the only civil one around here...after you've just went after Melania weaponizing her in hopes of getting under people's skin.

 

[Steeltime]

Yeah, I'm glad cooler heads prevailed and they talked Trump out of following through with his playpen fantasy of parading tanks around. Ended up being perfectly fine, couple of tanks and a Bradley on stationary display off to the side of the main stage.

That was the plan the entire time. Only lying leftists and lunatic liberals believed otherwise.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump isn’t taking “no tanks” for an answer this year for the Fourth of July.

He said Monday that a display of U.S. military tanks will be part of a special event he’s headlining July 4 in Washington, and an Associated Press photographer saw at least two M1A1 Abrams tanks and two Bradley Fighting Vehicles on flatcars in a railyard at the southeastern edge of Washington.

“We’re going to have some tanks stationed outside,” Trump said Monday from the Oval Office, appearing to acknowledge local officials’ earlier concerns. He offered no specifics on where the vehicles would be located.

“You’ve got to be pretty careful with the tanks because the roads have a tendency not to like to carry heavy tanks,” he said. "So we have to put them in certain areas, but we have the brand new Sherman tanks and we have the brand new Abrams tanks.”

 

[Steeltime]

So, Tibs, you mock Trump for a misstatement and belittle Melania for having nice breasts.

Nary a word about these *******, who should be stomped into oblivion ...



**** those clowns. God, I hate the left so much today that it really is not good for my health.

And I suspect not good for theirs either.

 

[Tibs]

Yeah really. You're a petty idiot. Um you know it rained right? And you know she got caught in it right? Look at the pic you posted. Look at her hair. Wet tops do strange things to nipples if you already didn't know. You're a petty idiot. Soon you'll be going on another rant trying to convince us how you're the only civil one around here...after you've just went after Melania weaponizing her in hopes of getting under people's skin.

Wow, what a sensitive bunch. Thank God you guys never went after Michelle Obama or Hillary. Not one iota, they were treated with the utmost respect around here. And I'm the petty idiot, nice.

 

[hamster]

 

[Spike]

Celebrating The Fourth Of July In The Nation's Capital with the American Flag?

They must all be racists according to the hating left!

 

[Tibs]

That was the plan the entire time.

Well, that became the plan and what eventually ended up happening. A totally civil, more than acceptable 4th of July celebration in the Nation's capital. Kind of like what we've had all these years. I've gone out of my way to praise President Trump for the way he handled himself and the manner in which the festivities ended up taking place.

But don't forget, the reason there was some concern about it dates back much further. It's not like it came out of thin air that Trump may want to do a full-scale military parade, with tanks rolling down the streets, et al. That's when all the comparisons began a la NK, Russia and the like. That's what many current and former military leaders spoke out against.

The president’s idea for a Trump-influenced Fourth of July celebration began within hours of attending a lavish Bastille Day parade in Paris in 2017, former aides say. Before Air Force One took off to return from France, Trump came to the back of the staff cabin and laid out the particulars of a proposed military parade in Washington — down to the types of tanks that he wanted in the streets and the kind of aircraft he wanted to fly overhead.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...828f5389013_story.html?utm_term=.d9058ec94f48

That plan then evolved into a Military Veterans Day Parade but rising cost estimates for the event led to its indefinite postponement. In August, Trump said he "canceled it" because local politicians were asking for too much money. Mayor Muriel Bowser disputed that claim.

During a Cabinet meeting in February, Trump said he was considering a July 4 parade at the Lincoln Memorial, which could become a tradition." "It could be an exciting day," Trump said.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...-presidential-address-report-says/1186852001/

With just over three weeks to go, exactly what’s going to happen in Washington on the Fourth of July remains a subject of intense confusion.

https://time.com/5605276/trump-fourth-of-july-independence-day-plans/

In the end, whatever concerns were raised - by me, by the Dems, by the media - were proven to be unwarranted. Trump's parade ended up not being a parade at all. The event also didn't become a 'once in a lifetime' spectacle as Trump was hyping it. It was a nice 4th of July celebration with a bit more involvement from the President than usual, but nothing over the top. He stayed on script, read a prepared speech from the teleprompter, organized a nice tribute to our armed forces. Congrats to him for doing so.

 

[Steeltime]

To sum up the left's rants about Trump and the 4th of July:

 

[Tibs]

Not sure how this fits into a non-partisan, non-campaign event like the 4th, but we'll let it slide.

 

[Steeltime]

Well, that became the plan and what eventually ended up happening. A totally civil, more than acceptable 4th of July celebration in the Nation's capital. Kind of like what we've had all these years.

Tibs, you do realize that CNN, MSNBC, etc. all ripped on Trump for politicizing the 4th festivities even AFTER the celebration was over. You know that, don't you? No matter the entire festival of liberal tears was based on a lie.

The plan to have the military hardware on DISPLAY was in place for months.

So CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, et al. declined carrying the festivities and the speech so that they can continue to lie about what happened.

A large panel of CNN contributors give reactions and takes blasting President Trump's Fourth of July "Salute to America" event and his speech talking about American and military history.

Former Admiral John Kirby said he was "troubled about the militaristic tone of the whole thing" and mocked President Trump's speech as "essentially 8th-grade history that was fairly sepia-toned and saccharine in its depth and context."

"I could have gotten this off of watching Schoolhouse Rock," Kirby added.

CNN's Ryan Lizza said the speech was "very basic" and seemed like he was "reading a Wikipedia page about historical events." Lizza also compared the speech to "a Schoolhouse Rock version of history or seventh or 8th grade research report," but said the president deserved credit "for not going off on a lot of sort of lunatic tangents."

**** those lying losers. Nobodies. Stupid whining ******* criticizing a speech in front of that crowd. Too basic and Wikipedia like. Because why?

No mention of slavery, or the plight of Muslims in this racist country, or the fact that Washington owned slaves and America is a racist shithole that should be pillaged and burnt to the ground.

That seems pretty much the leftist view today.

 

[Tibs]

Tibs, you do realize that CNN, MSNBC, etc. all ripped on Trump for politicizing the 4th festivities even AFTER the celebration was over. You know that, don't you?

Actually I don't, haven't been following those sites lately. If so, then that is petty on their part. There's a lot to criticize Trump for in general, but I don't have any issues with yesterday's events, at all.

 

[Steeltime]

Actually I don't, haven't been following those sites lately. If so, then that is petty on their part. There's a lot to criticize Trump for in general, but I don't have any issues with yesterday's events, at all.

Fair enough.

 

[Tibs]

Looks like CNN, MSNBC aren't the only ones. Strange how Russian State media (ie, the Kremlin) is increasingly ridiculing Trump. It's clear Putin thinks he has the world in the palm of his hand, like he's taking a victory lap. Who knows if the notion they were able to attack our democratic elections and get away with it has anything to do with their increased sense of self-worth and importance on the world stage. That's why I was so pissed Trump didn't put his foot down and tell Putin to **** off in Helsinki and ever since. It's like he's been played the fool but doesn't realize it. But that's a whole other matter.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Russia's state TV is obsessively bashing Trump's "low energy," "weak" parade with "rusty tanks." The hosts LOL at Trump's claim about "revolutionary war airports" & other historical flubs. "There's your city upon a hill, there's your world leader—and Martians have been defeated." <a href="https://t.co/wiw2OcFCLN">pic.twitter.com/wiw2OcFCLN</a></p>— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1147162499671908353?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.d753e00c3e838c1b2558149bd3f6ecb8.html?origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.steelernationforums.com" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;" frameborder="0"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe" frameborder="0"></iframe>

 

[Steeltime]

Not sure how this fits into a non-partisan, non-campaign event like the 4th, but we'll let it slide. [/IMG]

Because she is smoking hot, in a non-global warming way.

 

[Steeltime]

Looks like CNN, MSNBC aren't the only ones. Strange how Russian State media (ie, the Kremlin) is increasingly ridiculing Trump. It's clear Putin thinks he has the world in the palm of his hand, like he's taking a victory lap. Who knows if the notion they were able to attack our democratic elections and get away with it has anything to do with their increased sense of self-worth and importance on the world stage. That's why I was so pissed Trump didn't put his foot down and tell Putin to **** off in Helsinki and ever since. It's like he's been played the fool but doesn't realize it. But that's a whole other matter.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Russia's state TV is obsessively bashing Trump's "low energy," "weak" parade with "rusty tanks." The hosts LOL at Trump's claim about "revolutionary war airports" & other historical flubs. "There's your city upon a hill, there's your world leader—and Martians have been defeated." <a href="https://t.co/wiw2OcFCLN">pic.twitter.com/wiw2OcFCLN</a></p>— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1147162499671908353?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.d753e00c3e838c1b2558149bd3f6ecb8.html?origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.steelernationforums.com" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;" frameborder="0"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Why would I be surprised? Russia and Putin have never been our allies. Russia was involved in the 2016 election solely to raise discord, not change the outcome. I pointed out that the Russians paid for both anti-Trump and anti-Hillary ads. They bought more anti-Hillary ads only because they thought she would win and were attempting to wound the incoming President.

Little did they know that the (D)ims were on their side with a self-inflicted wound in the form of non-stop and bogus "Russian collusion" allegations.

 

[Tibs]

Why would I be surprised? Russia and Putin have never been our allies. Russia was involved in the 2016 election solely to raise discord, not change the outcome. I pointed out that the Russians paid for both anti-Trump and anti-Hillary ads. They bought more anti-Hillary ads only because they thought she would win and were attempting to wound the incoming President. Little did they know that the (D)ims were on their side with a self-inflicted wound in the form of non-stop and bogus "Russian collusion" allegations.

Understood. Then why did the President openly side with Putin in Helsinki, bashing - over and over again - American intelligence services and the FBI? Why has Trump never been able to muster up even a half-assed acknowledgement of what the Russians did. It was spelled out point blank in Mueller's report. Why has Trump continued to heap praise on Putin and play footsie with him at every opportunity? Why does Russia even matter to him? Its economy - and even their military - is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

Is Trump's ego that big - and that frail - that the notion he'd somehow look weak to his base be good enough reason to ignore what Putin & Russia did? And he continues to ignore it to this very day. Why? All that's done is feed into the narrative that he had some sort of complicity in the whole affair. It makes no sense. I never understood it and still don't, especially if he truly had no involvement in what went down in 2016. Besides being incredibly naive & the beneficiary of some dumb luck that Putin was open to seeing him get elected. He's said so himself, on more than one occasion.

And this is Trump, who'd bash the lil' old lady school crossing guard if she dared criticize him. Yet Putin stays clean as a whistle, nary the slightest criticism from Trump. It. does. not. make. sense.

 

[CharlesDavenport]

AOC said it was poorly attended. God is she stupid.

 

[hamster]

Understood. Then why did the President openly side with Putin in Helsinki, bashing - over and over again - American intelligence services and the FBI? Why has Trump never been able to muster up even a half-assed acknowledgement of what the Russians did. It was spelled out point blank in Mueller's report. Why has Trump continued to heap praise on Putin and play footsie with him at every opportunity? Why does Russia even matter to him? Its economy - and even their military - is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

Believe it or not, Trump is squeezing Russia, as well as Iran, with his energy policies. He is squeezing Russia with sanctions. He is selling arms to Ukraine, which ***** Putin off. You put too much importance on these public appearances. Trump plays the keep enemies closer game. Funny though, how before Trump, it was okay to sell uranium to Russia, as well as giving $500k speeches there.

As far as Trump's lack of trust in the US intelligence sources, you would too if they conspired to take you down with a soft coup. That score is yet to be settled, but is in the works.

 

[Spike]

Who the **** cares what the rabid left says, I tuned them out years ago