Added bonus: she plays for both teams.
The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
Added bonus: she plays for both teams.
Can't quite figure her out, she's acting almost 180 degrees from her days in the state house.
Maybe she's just smart, knowing if she goes all out squad, she has no chance of re-election, and she's pissing off the AZ socialists, so I'm good with that.
Maybe she's just smart, knowing if she goes all out squad, she has no chance of re-election, and she's pissing off the AZ socialists, so I'm good with that.
Last edited:
She squeeked by in the 2018 election, and knows that she is toast in the next election, an off-year election in 2024, if she goes full (D)imtard.
Winning...
Trump Administration Terminates California's Unlawful Power over Auto Industry
Today, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took the first step towards finalizing the proposed Safer, Affordable, Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles rule by issuing a final action entitled the “One National Program Rule.” The rule “will enable the federal government to provide nationwide uniform fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards for automobiles and light duty trucks,” the agencies state in their press release.
This is a momentous achievement for Team Trump. The One National Program Rule is a legal framework for regime change. It terminates California’s unlawful 10-year reign over national fuel economy policy.
The One National Program Rule will also dissolve the regulatory sword of Damocles that has been hanging over the U.S. auto industry since 2009, when the Obama-era EPA reconsidered and then approved California’s request for Clean Air Act authority to implement its own greenhouse gas motor vehicle standards.
. Consequently, as the new reality sinks in that California is no longer a fuel economy decision maker, automakers should feel free to prioritize the product preferences of consumers over the policy preferences of Sacramento bureaucrats. Whether they realize it or not, U.S. automakers owe the president a big thank you.
https://cei.org/blog/trump-administration-terminates-californias-unlawful-power-over-auto-industry
Oh...btw, the libs ain't havin it....no sir Trump don't be tellin them what they can and can't do.
The California-led plaintiffs make no real attempt to disprove the close relationship between motor vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel economy standards. Rather, they argue, citing 2007 federal appeals court cases in Vermont and California, that once the EPA grants California a waiver, under Section 209(b) of Clean Air Act, to implement its own motor vehicle emission standards, those standards become federal standards and, thus, are no longer subject to the EPCA preemption provision, which applies solely to state standards. The EPA granted California’s request for a waiver in July 2009. Hence, plaintiffs claim, EPCA does not preempt it.
Although somewhat clever, that argument does not withstand scrutiny. As the Supreme Court has stated, preemption standards apply “ab initio”—from the beginning. The EPA may lawfully grant a Clean Air Act waiver only for California emission standards that are legally valid. Because greenhouse gas standards are “related to” fuel economy standards, California’s motor vehicle greenhouse gas standards were already null and void before the EPA even decided to review them.
Trump Administration Terminates California's Unlawful Power over Auto Industry
Today, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took the first step towards finalizing the proposed Safer, Affordable, Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles rule by issuing a final action entitled the “One National Program Rule.” The rule “will enable the federal government to provide nationwide uniform fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards for automobiles and light duty trucks,” the agencies state in their press release.
This is a momentous achievement for Team Trump. The One National Program Rule is a legal framework for regime change. It terminates California’s unlawful 10-year reign over national fuel economy policy.
The One National Program Rule will also dissolve the regulatory sword of Damocles that has been hanging over the U.S. auto industry since 2009, when the Obama-era EPA reconsidered and then approved California’s request for Clean Air Act authority to implement its own greenhouse gas motor vehicle standards.
. Consequently, as the new reality sinks in that California is no longer a fuel economy decision maker, automakers should feel free to prioritize the product preferences of consumers over the policy preferences of Sacramento bureaucrats. Whether they realize it or not, U.S. automakers owe the president a big thank you.
https://cei.org/blog/trump-administration-terminates-californias-unlawful-power-over-auto-industry
Oh...btw, the libs ain't havin it....no sir Trump don't be tellin them what they can and can't do.
The California-led plaintiffs make no real attempt to disprove the close relationship between motor vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel economy standards. Rather, they argue, citing 2007 federal appeals court cases in Vermont and California, that once the EPA grants California a waiver, under Section 209(b) of Clean Air Act, to implement its own motor vehicle emission standards, those standards become federal standards and, thus, are no longer subject to the EPCA preemption provision, which applies solely to state standards. The EPA granted California’s request for a waiver in July 2009. Hence, plaintiffs claim, EPCA does not preempt it.
Although somewhat clever, that argument does not withstand scrutiny. As the Supreme Court has stated, preemption standards apply “ab initio”—from the beginning. The EPA may lawfully grant a Clean Air Act waiver only for California emission standards that are legally valid. Because greenhouse gas standards are “related to” fuel economy standards, California’s motor vehicle greenhouse gas standards were already null and void before the EPA even decided to review them.
Libs on FB be like, "Hey Republicans, where are you on states's rights?"
Burgundy on FB be like, "Hey Dems, where are you on a large, omnipotent Federal government?"
This is a two sided coin fur shur. For years there have been a separate fuel standards ( among other standards ) because Mexifornia considers itself a sovereign nation able to set their own laws independent of the rest of the Country. I wouldn't care personally if it didn't effect the rest of us financially but it does. Oil companies have long espoused the cost of 'special' cafe standards.
Just like about everything I look to buy has this warning..
Which has now morphed into...
It may be my imagination but I can't remember an item that did not contain this label...jus sayin'
I'm ready to vote yea to them being a separate Country and gettin' it over with.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,022
- Reaction score
- 585
- Points
- 113
My OCD takes over when a see a meme that uses the wrong word or has misspellings.
The correct term is "SECEDES" not "SUCCEEDS".
Big difference.
And how do you spell California? The author certainly can't decide.
That's where Bud Durpee is from.
At one time air pollution from cars in CA was bad enough (like 1967) that I don't blame them for wanting separate and more stringent standards but I read an article ten years or so ago that said new cars emitted less pollutants than were in the air already so essentially cars were air purifiers. I don't think we need any tougher pollution and gas mileage standards than we have now. Second, I think we should adopt European standards for emissions and crash protection so that we CAN import some of the European cars that get 50 mpg and people can buy them if they want. I mean, a Fiat Panda is good on gas but one look and you can see that you would lose a collision with a frog. Priorities.
This is what passes for a pickup truck in Italy:
Last edited:
That's where Bud Durpee is from.
At one time air pollution from cars in CA was bad enough (like 1967) that I don't blame them for wanting separate and more stringent standards but I read an article ten years or so ago that said new cars emitted less pollutants than were in the air already so essentially cars were air purifiers. I don't think we need any tougher pollution and gas mileage standards than we have now. Second, I think we should adopt European standards for emissions and crash protection so that we CAN import some of the European cars that get 50 mpg and people can buy them if they want. I mean, a Fiat Panda is good on gas but one look and you can see that you would lose a collision with a frog. Priorities.
This is what passes for a pickup truck in Italy:
LOL...from japan, with love.
Cushman made one like that too. There are some still behind the barns on a lot of golf courses.
Winning! Bwahahahahahahaha!!!
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/br...u-shut-down-a-spoiled-brats-press-conference/
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/br...u-shut-down-a-spoiled-brats-press-conference/
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,045
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Points
- 113
LOL...from japan, with love.
Cushman made one like that too. There are some still behind the barns on a lot of golf courses.
Looks like the 1965 Ford Econoline.
Looks like the 1965 Ford Econoline.
Close Boot, but notice the Ford had a real integrated bed and it had a 6 cylinder engine. The imports mostly had drop-side beds and little 1.4 liter engines. If I recall correctly, GM took over Izuzu and built them down in Columbia for a spell.
BTW,,,you see that Econoline is gettin' some decent money nowadays.
Alright, enough motorhead stuff...back to winning
y'all go ahead and say your goodbyes to Indy. He'll pull it off at the stem when he sees these...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...9k66T-FhJF-AZyaUK8XS911qP3LMAz2L6UcP3Y7GYVHyc
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...9k66T-FhJF-AZyaUK8XS911qP3LMAz2L6UcP3Y7GYVHyc
Holy ****.... MAGA x 2!
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Two pickets to titsburgh.
Hiiiiiiitttttttt. Wow
Damn. It would be over before I could get my pants off.
Sent from my VS988 using Steeler Nation mobile app
Sent from my VS988 using Steeler Nation mobile app