All I know is whatever Chuks said must have really ticked off Shades badly. Chuks isn't really worth his salary, but compared to what Robinson's ready to make and compared to his performance, Chuks a steal yet he was cut almost ASAP, in comparison. Chuks was not a great player; most of us thought it was a poor decision to give him the contract they did to begin with.
But paying an OT around $10 mill a year is not outrageous, even a slightly below average one, which is where I think Chuks is, slightly below average. He's not a total sh-- show like Moore (who is consistently ranked near dead last of every OT ranking there is). And paying Robinson anywhere near the $11 mill he's scheduled to make in 2024 is totally mind numbing - 34 receptions for 280 yards, zero TDs. In comparison Chuks' deal is nowhere near as obscene and out-of-this-world. This really highlights what you can get away with if your Shades' buddy: We had an OC who was the worst in the NFL and almost hung on for THREE years for cripes sake. We had a punter - who was buddies with Shades - who kept his roster spot year after year, shank after shank.
This is what you reap when you make decisions on how much you are "buddies" with players and coaches. Can you imagine Chuck Noll making personnel decisions based on how much he was buddies with them?