Aaron Rogers....injury update....

[Drink IRON City]

just busting your balls, doc

He’s got balls ?


Salute the nation

 

[SteelerSask2]

And the Knicks a little bit too.

 

[Troglodyte]

Note: Nick Chubbs injury last night did not occur on artificial turf.

 

[Steeler Pride]

Note: Nick Chubbs injury last night did not occur on artificial turf.

LOL...oh an injury occurred on grass....that means turf is no safer!! Floggy logic

 

[Troglodyte]

LOL...oh an injury occurred on grass....that means turf is no safer!! Floggy logic

So, Rogers injury was due to artificial turf, Chubbs injury was coincidentally on grass. Steeler not so Proud logic. It’s football, players get hurt.

 

[Ironcitysteelers]

So, Rogers injury was due to artificial turf, Chubbs injury was coincidentally on grass. Steeler not so Proud logic. It’s football, players get hurt.

Non contact vs helmet to knee.

 

[Troglodyte]

Non contact vs helmet to knee.

I’m quite certain Rodgers was trying to escape a tackle when he was injured. I’m even more certain that he’s ******* old for an NFL player.

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

Non contact vs helmet to knee.

Makes no difference...................... injuries are injuries. Aren't they? lol

 

[madinsomniac]

So, Rogers injury was due to artificial turf, Chubbs injury was coincidentally on grass. Steeler not so Proud logic. It’s football, players get hurt.

The anti turf people absolutely do have science on their side, regardless of rigged studies…

Logical point 1. Turf has greater traction than grass.
Factual proof A. The measured tensile strength of turf is greater than the highest tensile strength of the most sturdy natural grass
Factual proof B. Measured speed metrics, like 40 yard dashes or cone drills are always faster on turf than on grass for the same player… (which is why it’s often noted on scouting reports what they ran on.)

Logical Point 2. Severe joint and bone injuries happen when more force is applied to the ligament, muscle, or bone can physically stand.
Factual proof C (basic physics)

Logical point 3. turf creates more force at impact during collisions
Factual proof D the basic equation F=m*a. If body weight stays the same but one surface creates faster movement than that one creates more force

Logical point 4. If turf has greater tensile strength, then it tears at a higher force than grass does. Therefore the body part( usually legs) has to withstand greater force before ot gives way.

 

[SteelerFan448]

The anti turf people absolutely do have science on their side, regardless of rigged studies…

Logical point 1. Turf has greater traction than grass.
Factual proof A. The measured tensile strength of turf is greater than the highest tensile strength of the most sturdy natural grass
Factual proof B. Measured speed metrics, like 40 yard dashes or cone drills are always faster on turf than on grass for the same player… (which is why it’s often noted on scouting reports what they ran on.)

Logical Point 2. Severe joint and bone injuries happen when more force is applied to the ligament, muscle, or bone can physically stand.
Factual proof C (basic physics)

Logical point 3. turf creates more force at impact during collisions
Factual proof D the basic equation F=m*a. If body weight stays the same but one surface creates faster movement than that one creates more force

Logical point 4. If turf has greater tensile strength, then it tears at a higher force than grass does. Therefore the body part( usually legs) has to withstand greater force before ot gives way.

Anecdotal, the players say they prefer grass because their bodies feel better after playing on it.