• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Charlie Kirk shot from a distance, direct hit

I know you found this terribly offensive, you just acted like it didn’t. Right?



Each side can go tit for tat on INSTANCES where someone said something they should be reprimanded for.

That is utterly, wholly, completely, definitively, OBVIOUSLY different. Every MSM network and every Liberal pol has called the Right and Trump Nazis and fascists for a decade, non-stop.

As smarter people than I have said, when you call someone a Nazi, you infer violence is ok to deal with that problem. If any of us could stop Hitler (knowing what we know now), would we use any means necessary to do so? Yes.

The Left Machine has worked to brainwash Americans for 10 years to believe Trump is literally Hitler (and perhaps many of his followers) and THEREFORE he must be stopped by any means necessary. It is directly inferred when you call someone Nazi and fascist (that violence is ok).

And voila, you have 2 assassination attempts on Trump and Charlie Kirk dead.
 
He’s not a news journalist. It’s his right to say whatever he wants.
Yes he does have a right to say whatever he wants. Has he been arrested or charge with a crime?

He also has a right to say "I think Bob Iger is an idiot". If he gets fired for that is it a violation of his free speech rights? If you publicly insult half your company's customer base and get fired, is that a violation of your free speech rights?
 
Last edited:
He claimed the shooter was a Maga supporter not a left wing psycho, are you retarded?
Kimmel outright lied while fueling the political fire, and he knew it.
Why any business or individual the depends on public support would choose to alienate half of their customers is beyond me.
His viewership was less than the Food Channel making the decision by ABC an easy one.
 
The guy who killed the girl on the train in Charlotte didn't use a gun.
You're right. Murder has always been part of the human experience. But the mass murder of children in traditionally safe and secure places is a pretty new thing.
 
This is a pretty accurate summary of the engagement so far:

Coupon: "Let's take firearms away from Americans who have done nothing wrong and never even committed a crime!"
OFTB: "That doesn't make any sense. How will that reduce gun violence?"
Coupon: "Okay, great, let's do nothing! Taking away guns from law-abiding Americans will at least prevent law-abiding Americans from ... uhhh, see ... I mean ... that is ... well, see ... THOUSANDS OF ROUNDS PER MINUTE!"

Sure as hell hope coupon's coupon is for more Depends and not firearms since anybody that stupid would be dangerous if armed.
oh dear
 
You're right. Murder has always been part of the human experience. But the mass murder of children in traditionally safe and secure places is a pretty new thing.
Mass shootings in general. I'm usually armed because in 2000 a lunatic was shooting up two stores and killing people at the other end of a plaza where I was having breakfast. Google the name Richard Baumhammers.
I just got home from the PA State Pubbie meeting where we had ample extra security from the State Police, Sheriff's Deputies, and Constables.
 
You're right. Murder has always been part of the human experience. But the mass murder of children in traditionally safe and secure places is a pretty new thing.
Seems to be catching on with the trans kids.
 
Top