If this reporting is accurate, the bullet did not exit. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-kirk-miracle-surgeon-bullet-exit-wound.html
Per this article, he was not: https://archive.is/K2Ky7
Charlie Kirk shot from a distance, direct hit
- Thread starter KentuckySteeler
- Start date
If this reporting is accurate, the bullet did not exit. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-kirk-miracle-surgeon-bullet-exit-wound.html
Per this article, he was not: https://archive.is/K2Ky7
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 22,409
- Reaction score
- 25,888
- Points
- 113
Thanks. I was going to post these articles as well.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,029
- Reaction score
- 15,243
- Points
- 113
Have they done the routine matching of the bullet with the gun?
Paul Pelosi was getting his *** beaten by his gay lover.
how in the wide world of **** is that the same thing as Charlie Kirk being shot (and killed) in the ******* neck?
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,327
- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 113
Of course this was political.
It's the political left who have described every differing opinion as "hate". If you think affirmative action is discriminatory and wrong, it's because you hate black and brown people. If you think children shouldn't be pumped full of hormones and have healthy body parts lopped off, or little girls shouldn't have to undress in front of grown men, or that obviously it's not fair for a 6'4" man to compete against women, it's because you hate trans people. If you think killing unborn babies is wrong or that marriage and family is something women should aspire to, it's because you hate women.
When you describe everyone who disagrees with you on something as "hateful", you inspire violence. The shooter's own words were that Kirk was spreading hate. Kirk opened up his mic and politely debated countless people who disagreed with him. He never called them names or condemned them, just expressed his disagreement using facts and logic. Describing that as hate justified his murder to this young man. The left is partially responsible for this. And they continue to say that he was hateful and spreading hate and full of hate. They justify this murder day after day. Even the ones who say "He didn't deserve to die, but..." are justifying his murder. They share in the blame for the next person who is harmed.
And by the way I hate that President Trump said he hates his opponents too. That just might inspire some wacko to off one of his political enemies. He needs to take the temperature down too.
It's the political left who have described every differing opinion as "hate". If you think affirmative action is discriminatory and wrong, it's because you hate black and brown people. If you think children shouldn't be pumped full of hormones and have healthy body parts lopped off, or little girls shouldn't have to undress in front of grown men, or that obviously it's not fair for a 6'4" man to compete against women, it's because you hate trans people. If you think killing unborn babies is wrong or that marriage and family is something women should aspire to, it's because you hate women.
When you describe everyone who disagrees with you on something as "hateful", you inspire violence. The shooter's own words were that Kirk was spreading hate. Kirk opened up his mic and politely debated countless people who disagreed with him. He never called them names or condemned them, just expressed his disagreement using facts and logic. Describing that as hate justified his murder to this young man. The left is partially responsible for this. And they continue to say that he was hateful and spreading hate and full of hate. They justify this murder day after day. Even the ones who say "He didn't deserve to die, but..." are justifying his murder. They share in the blame for the next person who is harmed.
And by the way I hate that President Trump said he hates his opponents too. That just might inspire some wacko to off one of his political enemies. He needs to take the temperature down too.
god. damn. half right about something, but then you make a **** up that shouldn't even be a **** up for a **** up like you. SOMEONE looked up Biden, but ... it was likely not Robinson. It was his ****** furry lover. That would be like someone suggesting you researched pink glittery dildos when it was actually Tibs. I mean, that is believable, but may or may not be the case. Even so, more likely than what you suggest.
and you retort with... what?
First off, Ukraine aint got dick to do with Charlie Kirk getting shot in the neck by a furry loving ******. Secondly, it's blowing the roof off absurdity for even you to mention Ukraine as some kind of "Trump" card, considering the money laundering from the Bidens and that little shitshow clown running Ukraine (where elections were suspended, btw, fascist).
so you're doubling down on your belief that political violence is all well and good.
liar.