- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,450
- Reaction score
- 6,137
- Points
- 113
AIER.org? First result? An economic website for Covid information? What the **** is your search engine on?And there we have it. You get your knowledge from Google.
But I'll play your game. The very very first result...
View attachment 5240
Damn you make this far, far, far too easy son. It's like being a college professor and arguing with someone in primary school.
Every link that recommends people get the vaccine mutters the same line: "...because even after having COVID, you 'might' be subject to reinfection."
That's it. That's the logic. "MIGHT" get reinfected.
"The good people of Denmark have once again provided their excellent, centralized healthcare data to save us all, this time allowing researchers to track the COVID-19 infection rates of 4 million Danes last year, to see how many were infected twice. The results were published in The Lancet last week.
The study found that just 0.65% of people who tested positive for COVID-19 in the spring were reinfected later in the year. "
This is where you, Tibs, and Liberals in general are so damned dangerous. If Rick Madcow tells you "people are getting reinfected" you all take this as gospel, swear to it, drink that **** up and run around places like these screaming "Everyone's gonna get reinfected, you all have to get the vaccine!"
Except....you just don't know what you are talking about
DENMARK! You mean the Nordic country used for comparison in showing Sweden’s Covid failure? That Denmark?
MIGHT? Yes, might. I knew I MIGHT get Covid, but I didn’t, nor did anyone in my family despite two of them being essential workers that worked in public settings. Coincidence that we wore masks and got vaccinated and DIDN’T get Covid? MIGHT be, but I give that a 0.65% chance.
And we’re almost six months removed from the end of 2020. Are you certain that none of those people could have lost their antibodies since then? Are you arguing that natural antibodies last forever? Based on what?