Covid Vaccine

[DBS1970]

What we know 100% about the mRNA treatment is:

Does not stop you from getting the Wuhan Virus.
Does not stop you from transmitting the Wuhan Virus.
Has caused more vax injuries in 3 years than all the other vaccines combined in 100 years.

Do not take experimental vaccines kids.

None of us who did not get the vaccine regret not getting it.

 

[IndySteel]

What we know 100% about the mRNA treatment is:

Does not stop you from getting the Wuhan Virus.
Does not stop you from transmitting the Wuhan Virus.
Has caused more vax injuries in 3 years than all the other vaccines combined in 100 years.

Do not take experimental vaccines kids.

None of us who did not get the vaccine regret not getting it.

Absolutely correct. Anyone who argues otherwise is trying and failing to justify their retardation.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

“True”

And with that inane reply...

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Absolutely correct. Anyone who argues otherwise is trying and failing to justify HIS retardation.

FIFY

 

[Superman]

Is the Polio vaccine safe? Yes or No?

it was NOT at first. Kinda like, oh you know.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1383764/

 

[Superman]

Did you know as of 2022, 8 out of 10 people were vaccinated, making it 2.67 times more likely that unvaccinated people would die of Covid??? Math - the perfect science.

J'Xiden did be say 97 times more likely.

2.67 > 97 in FloggyWorld

 

[Superman]

FIFY

SAG, you raysiss misogynistic raysiss

(Stop Assuming Gender)

 

[Superman]

That’s not a major medical journal. A quick visit and it looks like it’s primarily anti-covid vax articles.

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/editorial-board/

highlight any name, scroll to google said name... then see their credentials.
also, do provide your very own, aside from being the receptionist at the minute clinic you also double as a janitor for.

 

[Troglodyte]

J'Xiden did be say 97 times more likely.

2.67 > 97 in FloggyWorld

And 2021 wasn’t 2022

 

[Troglodyte]

it was NOT at first. Kinda like, oh you know.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1383764/

It was abandoned within a month, we’re over 4 years into the COVID vaccine.

 

[Superman]

And 2021 wasn’t 2022

Supreme idiot. Saying that you’re 97% more likely to die if you’re unvaccinated is NOT the same as saying if you don’t get vaccinated you will die. It’s saying that if 10/100,000 vaccinated people die, 970/100,000 unvaccinated people will die.

so which is it?
did Joe say that or not? regardless of year.

 

[Badcat]

It was abandoned within a month, we’re over 4 years into the COVID vaccine.

why don't you man the **** up and just admit that you were bamboozeldy-doozaled

 

[Troglodyte]

so which is it?
did Joe say that or not? regardless of year.

IN
2021
NOT
2022

 

[Superman]

IN
2021
NOT
2022

so he did say that.
interesting aint it be?

and back when the vaccine was coming out in 2020, due to Fuhrer Trump pushing for an accelerated development, many on this very board were suggesting a wait and see approach. which you vehemently deny, yet somehow circle back and jerk off to something occurring in 2022 - a full two years later.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/history-disease-outbreaks-vaccine-timeline/covid-19

 

[Superman]

why don't you man the **** up and just admit that you were bamboozeldy-doozaled

if ze/zer/zem/zey were on a sinking ship, ze/zer/zey/zem would be climbing a mast right now.

 

[Troglodyte]

so he did say that.
interesting aint it be?

and back when the vaccine was coming out in 2020, due to Fuhrer Trump pushing for an accelerated development, many on this very board were suggesting a wait and see approach. which you vehemently deny, yet somehow circle back and jerk off to something occurring in 2022 - a full two years later.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/history-disease-outbreaks-vaccine-timeline/covid-19

Huh? When did I vehemently deny that people were taking a wait and see approach? Ya’ll were losing your **** over masks and other recommendations, why would I think you’d be more receptive to getting vaccinated?

 

[Superman]

Huh? When did I vehemently deny that people were taking a wait and see approach? Ya’ll were losing your **** over masks and other recommendations, why would I think you’d be more receptive to getting vaccinated?

@Tim Steelersfan - this ******* idiot has now blithered his lies into not seeing the first 750 pages of this thread.

 

[Badcat]

Huh? When did I vehemently deny that people were taking a wait and see approach? Ya’ll were losing your **** over masks and other recommendations, why would I think you’d be more receptive to getting vaccinated?

we weren't "losing our ****", we were asking common sense questions like why six feet? these masks aren't for screening viruses, and neither are bandannas. it was you who was telling us to trust the science, trust the government, you're all selfish for asking questions. here we are, proven correct and here you are with egg on your face grasping at straws to try and save face. it isn't working.

 

[IndySteel]

we weren't "losing our ****", we were asking common sense questions like why six feet? these masks aren't for screening viruses, and neither are bandannas. it was you who was telling us to trust the science, trust the government, you're all selfish for asking questions. here we are, proven correct and here you are with egg on your face grasping at straws to try and save face. it isn't working.

Don't forget the brilliant one-way grocery aisles. And the evil rule where you couldn't visit dying relatives.

 

[Badcat]

Don't forget the brilliant one-way grocery aisles. And the evil rule where you couldn't visit dying relatives.

too many moronic scenarios to include in one post, especially since i'm one handed for a few months.

 

[Superman]

too many moronic scenarios to include in one post, especially since i'm one handed for a few months.

still overmatched for Flog, who's operating on one gray brain cell feverishly tryna keep the operating system churning.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

I have a theory, Flog actually agrees with everyone here, but is just trolling.
Think about it, there can't be any other logical reason.

 

[Troglodyte]

we weren't "losing our ****", we were asking common sense questions like why six feet? these masks aren't for screening viruses, and neither are bandannas. it was you who was telling us to trust the science, trust the government, you're all selfish for asking questions. here we are, proven correct and here you are with egg on your face grasping at straws to try and save face. it isn't working.

6 feet and masks were just as much common sense and common courtesy as they were science. Like if you’re talking to someone and you feel a sneeze coming on, do you sneeze in their face or do you take a couple steps away, turn and sneeze into your arm?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

@Tim Steelersfan - this ******* idiot has now blithered his lies into not seeing the first 750 pages of this thread.

Those who cannot substantiate their positions on a message board conveniently deny there are pages prior to the one they are typing on.

 

[Badcat]

6 feet and masks were just as much common sense and common courtesy as they were science. Like if you’re talking to someone and you feel a sneeze coming on, do you sneeze in their face or do you take a couple steps away, turn and sneeze into your arm?

except I was yelled at and threatened to be removed from stores if i didn't keep the bandana over my nose, or my feet on the lines that were marked 6 feet apart, or head down an isle that was marked one way. my local hardware store couldn't open it's doors but i could go to Lowes. It wasn't just a courtesy as you now claim, it was policy. it was "science". fall in line or you will die. get the shot and have your passport or no food for you. no travel for you. get the "vaccine" or no employment for you.

that local hardware store that I frequented, got to know Jim who inherited from his Father, is now closed for good. He was devastated and felt that he let his Dad down.

but, common sense right? courtesy, you say?