Covid Vaccine

[IndySteel]

There was an autistic kid in my small Catholic elementary school. I don't think he was called "autistic", everyone just considered him mentally retarded (which was an acceptable term back then).

It still is. How else does one describe Flog and Tibs? (Well, besides all the other obvious adjectives. Hmm... I should make a list)

 

[oneforthebus]

What percentage of MDs read package inserts for drugs they are professionally trained to prescribe?

Do you actually believe doctors don't know (or look up if they don't know) potential adverse effects and interactions of drugs they prescribe? Of course they do (not saying every doctor in the world is competent but that's a separate issue). They don't need to read package inserts, they have pharmacology books and online resources.

The reality is there is no such thing as a medical intervention that has zero risks or adverse events in anyone. There aren't even many foods found in nature that have zero risks of harming anyone. I know someone who's allergic to mangos.

 

[Confluence]

 

[oneforthebus]

Not going down that whole VAERS rabbit hole again, lol. It's been discussed to death here.

 

[Confluence]

Do you actually believe doctors don't know (or look up if they don't know) potential adverse effects and interactions of drugs they prescribe? Of course they do (not saying every doctor in the world is competent but that's a separate issue). They don't need to read package inserts, they have pharmacology books and online resources.

The reality is there is no such thing as a medical intervention that has zero risks or adverse events in anyone. There aren't even many foods found in nature that have zero risks of harming anyone. I know someone who's allergic to mangos.

It's almost impossible to understand drug-drug interactions or drug-food interactions because of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic complexity. So FDA trots out drug approval upon drug approval without any requirement for understanding these potential conflicts. And like Zona said above, very little pharmacology is part of their education process.

So yeah, I believe the same docs that said Covid shots were safe and reliable did so because they believed what they were told from government and suppliers, because the safety data was not available.....you and I went at this several years and hundreds of pages ago.....and just last week the EU admitted it lacked the safety basis for the Covid mRNA shots. You could look it up.

So, it's not a large logical step to understand that overworked MDs may not do all the homework that their patients believe they do, and instead those MDs may rely on the sales reps in shorts skirts as mentioned above. That is confirmed by my understanding from those formerly in those short skirts, happy to buy lunches, dinners and junkets for CME.

It's also clear that western nations, led by the US, are over-prescribed with drugs. This is well understood. How could that happen with responsible healthcare?

So yeah, docs prescribe drugs that have side effects that they are unaware of, damaging the health of those they are charged with protecting.

You can easily verify this by researching how many deaths each year in the US are caused by medical errors; not a trivial amount. This doesn't include those misdiagnosed/over-precribed who survive an unfortunate MD experience, so even if you take the low end of the range, the public health concerns are significant.

 

[Superman]

Do you actually believe doctors don't know (or look up if they don't know) potential adverse effects and interactions of drugs they prescribe? Of course they do (not saying every doctor in the world is competent but that's a separate issue). They don't need to read package inserts, they have pharmacology books and online resources.

The reality is there is no such thing as a medical intervention that has zero risks or adverse events in anyone. There aren't even many foods found in nature that have zero risks of harming anyone. I know someone who's allergic to mangos.

I asked my doc about any correlation between my emergency appendectomy and the shot at my most recent visit. he said that there were some people who had adverse effects, but the shot likely saved millions.

he was prescribing something to me and I was asking the side effects. He literally asked me "do you think I'd prescribe something that I didn't believe in?" Essentially "trust me" on this. Despite a most recent prescription that did cause side effects. So ... trust your doc or trust your gut?

 

[Confluence]

Some light reading on "why did they do it?", from the Scots and Swiss.
The answer is exactly what you'd expect:

https://watermark02.silverchair.com/qnaf092.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAA3AwggNsBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggNdMIIDWQIBADCCA1IGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMw3cBSgeB-ape4dyoAgEQgIIDI1pzBL94E9w-MQ2VVN68L6NriIH2p6dw_1IzKxXM1G1wT497goowfGaetnaog_fb1xr1u3xsRC-YHzXNhaSmtPcF3G62IYC-T2TfuCWQGHkkH4gP-fi0BKUrMmxSOgjPcQW4wjWqTudXpMIKc2z-L59fou7rJhgnQeGmQZJVUR9DOynPmz3SGKdpznMjDDGIusM2lsfy4HyUkFY9fMRUaWo-9O_r53vThXcGDIAyWslhJAWpG2T-mnNFX8xj_ovwfZr630EkswyvWTPWFHCuQrCJlMts38F6DonlggqLDYgLIDqa-ybX2WskKExR4lCsFCExXtIIXiyitFOkQIHTNV0w1zzhkbEsOqBBrseo76Pr503GVA5J9EgC6dT_Nnxvkpk72zz89E9AyizcTCwdaQV7bjWpf7QVu4SauUAN1UZv7Bar7b6u2Fs2EwCnkXlFdC8Aol2JnFUVmmmF-e6vZgo1RiXyCjnWgNwy4_jSecwiPUQJaqePPCvrKAzHVjoAwSGwa-Ib4v0MTk51WGEIz3p77ilpmq8SQIy0ksHLkBWxVfMBemCFpWcvS1W0eQ6L0luTamnsJSxlNNE0d8k2JTEXwyGzzP5iYj7BWpCwzUJB5XrtEbM9wKVFY4wv1BgITnwzJBSWQXmflJM3UxBgAf3XOVWUKyv8ZeQLNV7CAuINKKg0IgUhayQ6a1QIFGSN4lEwseRFdqK2-8jjNJL0Vks7qOeLb2wLaAQ1XPYwBz6z0cVi0VPMGxJBypcCKxAcnDHv8dInfG-ZdUsnLDsfaOvKh4tDf9b-24sOzvDBF7aSxyA5ZKhLa131XN6x13JWgFoS88RvGtrLP0T__ds4so23g37j4Hmf47KmTxZmIIrVapXst5I99Mrj1qDHPKWR7BhEQ_jtHwS0EnTtBk24EpnYe795EpsaMzh8IfYWn2TCurMy7Rr405hfD7a2mQVsieknNFH65TOjHAkOAC_52x6d5Xai9N1Atim7JyprVzYPgCEpgor9OsT1qeDfWxJSSdowfWeYBIqP-LBItLzW_unhsvUVLpSELx3-KnUX-GGZ-RIm

 

[Confluence]

I asked my doc about any correlation between my emergency appendectomy and the shot at my most recent visit. he said that there were some people who had adverse effects, but the shot likely saved millions.

he was prescribing something to me and I was asking the side effects. He literally asked me "do you think I'd prescribe something that I didn't believe in?" Essentially "trust me" on this. Despite a most recent prescription that did cause side effects. So ... trust your doc or trust your gut?

What do call informed consent and did you give that informed consent to your doc?