• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Cowboys vs Bucs

Steelmann said:
Lol...... and you don’t think Brady wouldn’t have got 7?
Click to expand...



Well he was assited on the three so it's not out of reality to assume he would be assisted on 7.






Salute the nation
 
SteelBuckeye said:
Well, since the Cowboys were up 29 - 28 at the time TB started their final drive, the 7 points the kicker missed would have made the score 36 - 28. I don't think Brady is ever leading a team on a 9 point game winning drive. And scoring 8 points to tie the game would have been a lot more difficult than getting Succop (sp) in FG range to win. Wouldn't you agree?
Click to expand...
Chill,chill.
And of course I agree,oh master,that it would have been harder to get 7 or 8. No really? They didn’t even try for the endzone. Serious folk on here sometimes.
 
Zeurlein did not cost the Cowboys the game. One play after his missed FG Ronald Jones fumbled and the Cowboys scored a TD .His other FG miss was from 60 yards yet some here think that was evidently a gimme.


.
 
Buccaneers are the first team in NFL history to lose the turnover margin by at least 3, incur 100 penalty yards, allow 450 yards, and still win the game.
 
SteelerinMD said:
Buccaneers are the first team in NFL history to lose the turnover margin by at least 3, incur 100 penalty yards, allow 450 yards, and still win the game.
Click to expand...


I bring up a HUSTON game a long while back where as we turned the ball over 7 times had a gazillion yards to their 163(?) total and we LOST.




Salute the nation
 
MB47 said:
Zeurlein did not cost the Cowboys the game. One play after his missed FG Ronald Jones fumbled and the Cowboys scored a TD .His other FG miss was from 60 yards yet some here think that was evidently a gimme.


.
Click to expand...
the 60 yarder wasn't a gimme, but the 30 yarder was and he missed it badly!, same with the xtra point. That's 4 points he shanked.
 
Roy92040 said:
Well Brady gets another gift win.
Click to expand...
Brady shouldn't even be playing. It's amazing how the league has suppressed the fact that he was not listed on the injury report for an entire season when he was injured. Steelers do it for one practice - all kinds of huge fines. Brady does it a full season - crickets.
 
Brady has the sickest botox look going lol
 
Cowboy fans may be upset about the no call but Michael Irvin better not say a word because pushing off was basically his whole career.

Collinsworth did have a good point on that play. In slo-mo it likes blatant, but in real time, it was a back shoulder and Godwin stopped and came back and the CB was on his heels already off balance and falling back to try to change direction, so that made the contact look much worse than it actually was. Since that DB was already falling back, that small shove probably didn’t impact the play much. It could have been called but it was not an egregious no call.
 
Wasn't Dallas's defense historically bad last year? TB could have easily won by alot more. The first int was a screen to fournette who deflected the ball to dallas. Looked like he would have had a decent gain in the play. The also fumbled, dropped other passes and what not. TB moved the ball pretty easy and shot themselves in the foot all night.
 
After the shanked FG on the next play the Bucks fumbled and the Cowpukes scored a TD .kinda cancels out the missed FG.
 
I know they called holding a few times when they bear wrestled Vita Vea to the ground, but holy **** Dallas was holding all night. Our guys better be practicing that technique.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top