BOOM!
Doesn't he have to, you know, get the nomination first?
Dem primaries begin! Let there be fire and brimstone in Iowa!
- Thread starter Spike
- Start date
Doesn't he have to, you know, get the nomination first?
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 14,923
- Reaction score
- 13,226
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
He figures it's bought and paid for. Just like hillary.
Awesome ticket! A midget commie and a dyke commie...
God this would be hysterical.
WOAH: FiveThirtyEight Predicts 'No One' Will Win a Majority of Democrat Delegates
The last time there was a brokered convention was in 1952. Is the next one going to happen it 2020?
According to FiveThirtyEight, "No One" has a slightly better chance of winning more than half of pledged delegates than Bernie Sanders does. There's a 2 in 5 chance (37 percent) that no candidate will receive a majority of delegates, and there's a 1 in 3 chance (36 percent) that Bernie Sanders will.
This projection is sure to change over the coming weeks, but a few weeks ago the chances of a brokered convention were just 1 in 7 (15 percent).
With Joe Biden's campaign looking glum, a brokered convention might be his best chance, assuming his supporters haven't jumped ship to Mike Bloomberg or some other so-called moderate.
A brokered convention would be a lot of fun to watch but devastating for Democrats. The chances of Bernie Sanders coming out on top in a brokered convention seem slim to me—and if Bernie goes into the convention with the most delegates but doesn't leave the convention as the nominee, Bernie supporters are going to be livid. Whoever the candidate is, if the Democrats have to wait until mid-July to know for sure who their nominee is going be, it puts their party at a significant disadvantage. In 2004, John Kerry secured enough delegates to be the presumptive nominee after Super Tuesday, months before the convention, giving the party time to coalesce behind him, and for him to pick a running mate before the convention. It would be better for the Democrats to have a presumptive nominee as soon as possible, and to not have one who will just increase division in the party in a crucial election year.
So, I'm rooting for "No One" to win the most delegates. It'll be amusing to watch and doesn't help them one bit.
WOAH: FiveThirtyEight Predicts 'No One' Will Win a Majority of Democrat Delegates
The last time there was a brokered convention was in 1952. Is the next one going to happen it 2020?
According to FiveThirtyEight, "No One" has a slightly better chance of winning more than half of pledged delegates than Bernie Sanders does. There's a 2 in 5 chance (37 percent) that no candidate will receive a majority of delegates, and there's a 1 in 3 chance (36 percent) that Bernie Sanders will.
This projection is sure to change over the coming weeks, but a few weeks ago the chances of a brokered convention were just 1 in 7 (15 percent).
With Joe Biden's campaign looking glum, a brokered convention might be his best chance, assuming his supporters haven't jumped ship to Mike Bloomberg or some other so-called moderate.
A brokered convention would be a lot of fun to watch but devastating for Democrats. The chances of Bernie Sanders coming out on top in a brokered convention seem slim to me—and if Bernie goes into the convention with the most delegates but doesn't leave the convention as the nominee, Bernie supporters are going to be livid. Whoever the candidate is, if the Democrats have to wait until mid-July to know for sure who their nominee is going be, it puts their party at a significant disadvantage. In 2004, John Kerry secured enough delegates to be the presumptive nominee after Super Tuesday, months before the convention, giving the party time to coalesce behind him, and for him to pick a running mate before the convention. It would be better for the Democrats to have a presumptive nominee as soon as possible, and to not have one who will just increase division in the party in a crucial election year.
So, I'm rooting for "No One" to win the most delegates. It'll be amusing to watch and doesn't help them one bit.
If Trump did this, Tibs would **** his pants for months on this board.
Wait....he does that anyway.
Moving on....
Swamp Report: Peter Schweizer Reveals How Bernie Sanders Enriches His Family with Campaign Funds
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has repeatedly used his political position to steer money — both contributions to his campaigns and government funding — to his family members, explained Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, senior contributor to Breitbart News, and author of Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.
Throughout his congressional career in the House and Senate, Bernie Sanders has used campaign funds to procure media-buying services from a consulting company founded and operated by his wife and her children.
Schweizer stated:
As mayor of Burlington, VT, Bernie Sanders appointed his wife to an initially unpaid position in his municipal administration. Against the city council’s objections, he later put her on the payroll at local taxpayers’ expense.
Schweizer recalled Jane Sanders’ previous role as head of Burlington College, a private school with fewer than 200 students. One of the college’s board members admitted that hiring Jane Sanders was a function of her marriage to Bernie Sanders — then a member of House of Representatives from Vermont — believing it would help the school’s fundraising endeavors.
Despite its financial difficulties at the time, in 2009, Burlington College contracted with an unaccredited woodworking school run by Jane Sanders’ daughter, Carina Driscoll. Over $500,000 was funneled to from Burlington College to the woodworking school.
“Carina Driscoll’s school also received at least one federal grant from the US Department of Agriculture,” added Schweizer, noting that Bernie Sanders had oversight over the USDA’s funding at the time as a member of the Senate Budget Committee.
“I don’t believe in Charity,” said Bernie Sanders while mayor of Burlington.
Schweizer concluded, “While Sanders may not be a fan of charity, he seems to have no problem awarding jobs and contracts to those closest to him.”
“The biggest charity in Bernie’s life is Bernie,” said Schweizer in January.
Read the full video report’s transcript here:https://drilldowntv.com/2020/02/12/bernie-sanders/#_ftn4
Wait....he does that anyway.
Moving on....
Swamp Report: Peter Schweizer Reveals How Bernie Sanders Enriches His Family with Campaign Funds
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has repeatedly used his political position to steer money — both contributions to his campaigns and government funding — to his family members, explained Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, senior contributor to Breitbart News, and author of Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.
Throughout his congressional career in the House and Senate, Bernie Sanders has used campaign funds to procure media-buying services from a consulting company founded and operated by his wife and her children.
Schweizer stated:
As mayor of Burlington, VT, Bernie Sanders appointed his wife to an initially unpaid position in his municipal administration. Against the city council’s objections, he later put her on the payroll at local taxpayers’ expense.
Schweizer recalled Jane Sanders’ previous role as head of Burlington College, a private school with fewer than 200 students. One of the college’s board members admitted that hiring Jane Sanders was a function of her marriage to Bernie Sanders — then a member of House of Representatives from Vermont — believing it would help the school’s fundraising endeavors.
Despite its financial difficulties at the time, in 2009, Burlington College contracted with an unaccredited woodworking school run by Jane Sanders’ daughter, Carina Driscoll. Over $500,000 was funneled to from Burlington College to the woodworking school.
“Carina Driscoll’s school also received at least one federal grant from the US Department of Agriculture,” added Schweizer, noting that Bernie Sanders had oversight over the USDA’s funding at the time as a member of the Senate Budget Committee.
“I don’t believe in Charity,” said Bernie Sanders while mayor of Burlington.
Schweizer concluded, “While Sanders may not be a fan of charity, he seems to have no problem awarding jobs and contracts to those closest to him.”
“The biggest charity in Bernie’s life is Bernie,” said Schweizer in January.
Read the full video report’s transcript here:https://drilldowntv.com/2020/02/12/bernie-sanders/#_ftn4
Remember when Ted Cruz picked Carly as his VP? Lol. That was his low desperation moment, ala Jeb begging his piss poor audience to “please clap”.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Mini Mike and Hillary would be great. The two most unlikable people in the political arena teaming up. It would be awesome to see the press having to feign admiration for them.
Do you want to get suicided? Because that's how you get suicided.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 3,119
- Reaction score
- 2,694
- Points
- 113
President Bloomberg was found dead today from an apparent suicide. Investigators were puzzled how the 5'4 Bloomberg managed to hang himself with a 6' of length of rope. This was explained later by the discovery of 2 shots to the back of the head.
President Bloomberg left an unsigned typed note explaining that having billions of dollars can buy you a lot of things, including the highest office in the land, but it cannot buy you happiness.
Bloomberg, a noted philanthropist, left all of his vast wealth and personal fortune to charity, and in a recent change, the primary beneficiary is the Clinton Foundation.
President Bloomberg left an unsigned typed note explaining that having billions of dollars can buy you a lot of things, including the highest office in the land, but it cannot buy you happiness.
Bloomberg, a noted philanthropist, left all of his vast wealth and personal fortune to charity, and in a recent change, the primary beneficiary is the Clinton Foundation.
God this would be hysterical.
WOAH: FiveThirtyEight Predicts 'No One' Will Win a Majority of Democrat Delegates
The last time there was a brokered convention was in 1952. Is the next one going to happen it 2020?
According to FiveThirtyEight, "No One" has a slightly better chance of winning more than half of pledged delegates than Bernie Sanders does. There's a 2 in 5 chance (37 percent) that no candidate will receive a majority of delegates, and there's a 1 in 3 chance (36 percent) that Bernie Sanders will.
This projection is sure to change over the coming weeks, but a few weeks ago the chances of a brokered convention were just 1 in 7 (15 percent).
With Joe Biden's campaign looking glum, a brokered convention might be his best chance, assuming his supporters haven't jumped ship to Mike Bloomberg or some other so-called moderate.
A brokered convention would be a lot of fun to watch but devastating for Democrats. The chances of Bernie Sanders coming out on top in a brokered convention seem slim to me—and if Bernie goes into the convention with the most delegates but doesn't leave the convention as the nominee, Bernie supporters are going to be livid. Whoever the candidate is, if the Democrats have to wait until mid-July to know for sure who their nominee is going be, it puts their party at a significant disadvantage. In 2004, John Kerry secured enough delegates to be the presumptive nominee after Super Tuesday, months before the convention, giving the party time to coalesce behind him, and for him to pick a running mate before the convention. It would be better for the Democrats to have a presumptive nominee as soon as possible, and to not have one who will just increase division in the party in a crucial election year.
So, I'm rooting for "No One" to win the most delegates. It'll be amusing to watch and doesn't help them one bit.
This is just because all of the Democratic candidates are equally qualified, and any one of them would make fine Presidents............ Excuse from the left.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer vowed to call for a $22 hourly minimum wage if he wins his longshot bid to unseat incumbent President Trump in November.
That's what an undergraduate degree in economics and politics from Yale and an MBA from the Stanford School of Business will get ya.
That's what an undergraduate degree in economics and politics from Yale and an MBA from the Stanford School of Business will get ya.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Bernie gonna blow a gasket when these two square off
Bloomberg's billions stay veiled while funding 2020 campaign
Michael Bloomberg has bought his way into the 2020 presidential race with hundreds of millions of dollars from his personal fortune. But he may not provide any details about where that money comes from until more than half of the Democratic primary is over.
While his rivals have disclosed years of financial details on everything from book deals to consulting clients to vacation homes, Bloomberg has not released any financial information since launching a late 2020 campaign fueled entirely by his $60 billion-plus in wealth. The billionaire and former New York City mayor was granted an extension on filing mandatory financial disclosure forms until March 20 — more than halfway through the delegate race and after Super Tuesday, when Bloomberg hopes to make his first splash in delegate-rich states like California and Texas.
Bloomberg has often blamed his late entry into the 2020 race for his unusual choices, such as not trying to qualify for the Democratic debates or skipping the Iowa caucuses. Critics see something else: A candidate with a history of buying his way around requirements that less wealthy politicians have to follow. He’s “skipping the democracy part of this,” Elizabeth Warren quipped in a recent MSNBC interview.
“The notion that we can go through Super Tuesday without having this legally required information for a presidential candidate who is spending millions of dollars is troublesome,” said Meredith McGehee, executive director of the government oversight group Issue One. “The American people are being asked to make a decision about a candidate without information that, the law says, should be important.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/22/michael-bloomberg-2020-funding-102467
-------------------
BERNIE OR BUST!!!
Bloomberg's billions stay veiled while funding 2020 campaign
Michael Bloomberg has bought his way into the 2020 presidential race with hundreds of millions of dollars from his personal fortune. But he may not provide any details about where that money comes from until more than half of the Democratic primary is over.
While his rivals have disclosed years of financial details on everything from book deals to consulting clients to vacation homes, Bloomberg has not released any financial information since launching a late 2020 campaign fueled entirely by his $60 billion-plus in wealth. The billionaire and former New York City mayor was granted an extension on filing mandatory financial disclosure forms until March 20 — more than halfway through the delegate race and after Super Tuesday, when Bloomberg hopes to make his first splash in delegate-rich states like California and Texas.
Bloomberg has often blamed his late entry into the 2020 race for his unusual choices, such as not trying to qualify for the Democratic debates or skipping the Iowa caucuses. Critics see something else: A candidate with a history of buying his way around requirements that less wealthy politicians have to follow. He’s “skipping the democracy part of this,” Elizabeth Warren quipped in a recent MSNBC interview.
“The notion that we can go through Super Tuesday without having this legally required information for a presidential candidate who is spending millions of dollars is troublesome,” said Meredith McGehee, executive director of the government oversight group Issue One. “The American people are being asked to make a decision about a candidate without information that, the law says, should be important.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/22/michael-bloomberg-2020-funding-102467
-------------------
BERNIE OR BUST!!!
Huma Abedeen got a purty mouth.
Biden is about to face more heat, thank goodness, thanks to Rudy.
Rudy Giuliani Lays Bare Joe Biden’s–Not Hunter’s–Crimes in Ukraine
Now that President Trump has been acquitted for life by the US Senate, there is a renewed interest in investigating Ukrainian corruption. That’s a by-product of the impeachment farce that the Democrats weren’t banking on, as the American public was exposed to much about Ukraine-related corruption that the Democrat-media complex has kept hidden during the Age of Trump. For example, three members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – Ron Johnson (R-WI), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and John Barrasso (R-WY) – are reportedly interested in meeting with Ukraine’s President.
Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, has been conducting a private investigation into Ukraine corruption for over a year now and has collected (in his words) a mountain of evidence that will bury the Bidens. He has posted six podcasts on his website that detail some of that evidence. Giuliani has been making the rounds on cable news programs trying to get that word out.
On her Fox News Channel program earlier in the week, Shannon Bream reported that Democrats are accusing DoJ of creating a clearinghouse for Rudy Giuliani’s “fabricated dirt on a political opponent.” To explore that allegation, she interviewed Rudy Giuliani directly about it. Here is some of the Q&A.
End of the Q&A. It’s not just Hunter Biden; it’s Joe Biden who faces legal jeopardy, too. The legacy media have been covering for the Bidens for years, claiming that the “Ukraine corruption story” has been debunked. No one who has listened to a Rudy Giuliani interview on the subject or watched one of his podcasts detailing the evidence can say with a straight face that there’s nothing there. This is going to get really interesting as the US attorney in Pittsburgh sifts through that mountain of evidence. Ukraine will be the end of Joe Biden’s political career.
Rudy Giuliani Lays Bare Joe Biden’s–Not Hunter’s–Crimes in Ukraine
Now that President Trump has been acquitted for life by the US Senate, there is a renewed interest in investigating Ukrainian corruption. That’s a by-product of the impeachment farce that the Democrats weren’t banking on, as the American public was exposed to much about Ukraine-related corruption that the Democrat-media complex has kept hidden during the Age of Trump. For example, three members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – Ron Johnson (R-WI), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and John Barrasso (R-WY) – are reportedly interested in meeting with Ukraine’s President.
Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, has been conducting a private investigation into Ukraine corruption for over a year now and has collected (in his words) a mountain of evidence that will bury the Bidens. He has posted six podcasts on his website that detail some of that evidence. Giuliani has been making the rounds on cable news programs trying to get that word out.
On her Fox News Channel program earlier in the week, Shannon Bream reported that Democrats are accusing DoJ of creating a clearinghouse for Rudy Giuliani’s “fabricated dirt on a political opponent.” To explore that allegation, she interviewed Rudy Giuliani directly about it. Here is some of the Q&A.
End of the Q&A. It’s not just Hunter Biden; it’s Joe Biden who faces legal jeopardy, too. The legacy media have been covering for the Bidens for years, claiming that the “Ukraine corruption story” has been debunked. No one who has listened to a Rudy Giuliani interview on the subject or watched one of his podcasts detailing the evidence can say with a straight face that there’s nothing there. This is going to get really interesting as the US attorney in Pittsburgh sifts through that mountain of evidence. Ukraine will be the end of Joe Biden’s political career.
Kobuchar stepping in **** next....pandering for minority votes.
Klobuchar says English should not be US national language, reversing from prior vote
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/amy-klobuchar-english-should-not-be-the-national-language/
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Democratic presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar says she no longer believes English should be the national language of the U.S. - AP</p>— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) <a href="https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1228783797224853504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar says she no longer believes English should be the national language of the U.S., disavowing a vote she took more than a decade ago as she tries to build support in a state where Hispanics make up a critical constituency.
Campaigning in Las Vegas, the three-term Minnesota senator said Friday that she has changed her stance since voting for an English-language amendment in 2007 and has “taken a strong position against” it. She also blasted President Donald Trump for using immigrants as “wedges” and said as president she would work with Republicans to achieve comprehensive immigration reform.
Klobuchar’s record on immigration is under scrutiny after her third-place finish in the New Hampshire primary this week revived her campaign and sent her on to Nevada’s Feb. 22 caucuses with fresh momentum. After focusing much of her campaign on the first two voting states — Iowa and New Hampshire, both predominantly white — she’s now navigating a much more diverse electorate, where some of her moderate positions and willingness to vote with her Republican colleagues could be a liability.
Klobuchar was one of 17 Democrats to support a 2007 amendment that would have reversed President Bill Clinton’s executive order requiring federal agencies to provide materials in languages other than English. It passed 64-33, but the larger immigration bill died.
The amendment’s sponsor, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe, said after the June 2007 vote that the amendment was about “preserving our culture and heritage” and would “send a message to all those who have come to our country and all those who will immigrate here in the future that English is the language of our land.”
Klobuchar says English should not be US national language, reversing from prior vote
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/amy-klobuchar-english-should-not-be-the-national-language/
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Democratic presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar says she no longer believes English should be the national language of the U.S. - AP</p>— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) <a href="https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1228783797224853504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar says she no longer believes English should be the national language of the U.S., disavowing a vote she took more than a decade ago as she tries to build support in a state where Hispanics make up a critical constituency.
Campaigning in Las Vegas, the three-term Minnesota senator said Friday that she has changed her stance since voting for an English-language amendment in 2007 and has “taken a strong position against” it. She also blasted President Donald Trump for using immigrants as “wedges” and said as president she would work with Republicans to achieve comprehensive immigration reform.
Klobuchar’s record on immigration is under scrutiny after her third-place finish in the New Hampshire primary this week revived her campaign and sent her on to Nevada’s Feb. 22 caucuses with fresh momentum. After focusing much of her campaign on the first two voting states — Iowa and New Hampshire, both predominantly white — she’s now navigating a much more diverse electorate, where some of her moderate positions and willingness to vote with her Republican colleagues could be a liability.
Klobuchar was one of 17 Democrats to support a 2007 amendment that would have reversed President Bill Clinton’s executive order requiring federal agencies to provide materials in languages other than English. It passed 64-33, but the larger immigration bill died.
The amendment’s sponsor, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe, said after the June 2007 vote that the amendment was about “preserving our culture and heritage” and would “send a message to all those who have come to our country and all those who will immigrate here in the future that English is the language of our land.”
so now people who farm and work in factories are stupid.....
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,554
- Reaction score
- 22,380
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
A Bernie vs Bloomberg match would split them completely
Bernie bros would never vote for an old white billionaire, they would stay home instead and the country will never vote for a communist, so its lose, lose for them
Hell Bernie is already running a third party campaign from the inside right now, fighting the DNC and wall street is the only thing he knows, lol
Bernie bros would never vote for an old white billionaire, they would stay home instead and the country will never vote for a communist, so its lose, lose for them
Hell Bernie is already running a third party campaign from the inside right now, fighting the DNC and wall street is the only thing he knows, lol
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Go Bernie bros!
#BernieOrBust is now #BernieOrElse!
"Good. We want you to be terrified. Win with us or lose without us."
#BernieOrElse
"Libs who are flirting with Bloomberg now should be aware that they are going on lists. Next time they pretend to care about racism or sexual harassment or really anything other than money and power, we will remember"
"We made it to Joe Biden's Wall Street fundraiser and brought a coffin to mourn the death of his campaign"
"This year we either get Bernie in Lincoln's sheets, or riots in the streets. There is no third option"
#BernieOrBurnItDown
#Bernie OrVest
Yeah, down wit da revolution baby!
#BernieOrBust is now #BernieOrElse!
"Good. We want you to be terrified. Win with us or lose without us."
#BernieOrElse
"Libs who are flirting with Bloomberg now should be aware that they are going on lists. Next time they pretend to care about racism or sexual harassment or really anything other than money and power, we will remember"
"We made it to Joe Biden's Wall Street fundraiser and brought a coffin to mourn the death of his campaign"
"This year we either get Bernie in Lincoln's sheets, or riots in the streets. There is no third option"
#BernieOrBurnItDown
#Bernie OrVest
Yeah, down wit da revolution baby!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,596
- Reaction score
- 29,968
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Similar threads
