Cars have regulations. You can't drive down the road in a race car. Cars also serve a purpose.
Knives also serve a purpose.
Guns have a purpose. One that is specifically identified and protected in a Constitutional amendment.
Unlike cars, or knives, or pools, or chickens. Unless you do weird things with chickens, in which case the penumbral rights under the 4th and 14th amendments might be implicated.
Tell me the purpose of a 100 round drum?
To hold 100 rounds. I'm pretty sure that's in the name.
I have not seen where home invaders have been taken out because the owner had a gun carrying 100 bullets.
If I am law-abiding and have no plans on using my property for illegal purposes, what the **** business is it of yours why I want a 100 round magazine? You may have some weird fetish for foot pictures, and nude pictures of Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. The fact that your desires are ******* weird is irrelevant to the fact that you have a right of privacy to have those in your home, as long as you are not using them for illegal purposes, such as showing the pictures to somebody checking out the results of Lasik surgery.
The rest of your arguments are just plain stupid.
You're the one who didn't know what a 100 round magazine was used for.
jitter said:
The point is no civilian has the need to carry around that kinda ammunition.
It's the bill of RIGHTS, not the bill of needs. Or are you saying a woman has the right to an abortion only when she can prove it is needed?
Make up your mind.
jitter said:
I am not for banning assault rifles because any semi auto gun could be considered an assault rifle. Besides the dayton shooter actually used a pistol.
True. Also, no mass shooter has EVER used a 100 round magazine. Those magazines are owned solely by law-abiding citizens, exercising their 2nd amendment rights.
