Why don't they ask the FBI for help? They can move mountains in 8 days.
FBI is conducting a new investigation on Clinton emails!
- Thread starter IndySteel
- Start date
Why don't they ask the FBI for help? They can move mountains in 8 days.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 414
- Reaction score
- 210
- Points
- 43
You were on to something and then this tumbled into the usual "people who vote for a Democrat are stupid". What's amazing is depending on where you go there are people calling people stupid on both sides and they are both right. Let's not pretend that a ton of people don't vote for people in either party for completely stupid and uninformed reasons.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,580
- Reaction score
- 22,416
- Points
- 113
It's officially US"serfs" against THEM "rulers of the land above all" ..sad sad times
If stupid people didn't vote then there would never be a democRAT president.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,605
- Reaction score
- 29,986
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
The (D)'s are the party of free ****, and anybody who thinks otherwise is just not paying attention. Let's run a little list of their promised goodies, shall we??
- Free medical care.
- Free schooling, including college
- Free rent via Section 8
- Free food via foodstamps and WIC
- Free transportation via commuter cards and subsidies
- Free phones via Bomma Phones, Inc.
- Free internet
- Free childcare
- Free birth control
Seriously, what part of life have the (D)'s not made massive promises for free ****? I challenge you to name one - just one.
The freedom to be self-supportive and earn your own way.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 10,999
- Reaction score
- 13,092
- Points
- 113
On the one hand, as a humane society, we have the responsibility to care for that segment of society which cannot care for itself.
WIC is a good example of a program that I think is merited.
The problem is NOT necessarily in a given program - but in how a program is exploited by people who neither need it's services or wish to get away from needing those services as quickly as humanly possible. It is that segment of the population who take advantage of the goodness of human nature that we need to excise.
SO - what needs to be worked out is a reasonable and non-bloated process to determine how to provide services for people who truly need them and then get those people OFF services as quickly as possible. There needs to be a realistic term for services and a reasonable plan to move people beyond a need for services.
Having more children is NOT a viable process for getting more services. In fact, that should somehow be a detriment. Is that cruel? Probably. But ultimately you need to remove the idea that having more and more children will get you greater benefits while you receive services. In the short term, this will cause great hardship for people on services. They will be suffer greatly. In the long term, you will create a more self-sufficient populace because people who struggle financially will realize having more children will only increase their struggle.
WIC is a good example of a program that I think is merited.
The problem is NOT necessarily in a given program - but in how a program is exploited by people who neither need it's services or wish to get away from needing those services as quickly as humanly possible. It is that segment of the population who take advantage of the goodness of human nature that we need to excise.
SO - what needs to be worked out is a reasonable and non-bloated process to determine how to provide services for people who truly need them and then get those people OFF services as quickly as possible. There needs to be a realistic term for services and a reasonable plan to move people beyond a need for services.
Having more children is NOT a viable process for getting more services. In fact, that should somehow be a detriment. Is that cruel? Probably. But ultimately you need to remove the idea that having more and more children will get you greater benefits while you receive services. In the short term, this will cause great hardship for people on services. They will be suffer greatly. In the long term, you will create a more self-sufficient populace because people who struggle financially will realize having more children will only increase their struggle.
Any government program that rewards bad behavior should be abolished. Having children out of wedlock, not being able to afford to raise them, and to expect society to pay the bill, is very bad behavior.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 10,999
- Reaction score
- 13,092
- Points
- 113
And the children Hamster?
What would you do with the children? Throw them in the river? Would you have the police detain the mother while you toss the children in the water yourself? I'm just curious?
It's not that I disagree that people take advantage of the system or that it doesn't need to be fixed. But the victims are the children. Not the deadbeat parents.
What would you do with the children? Throw them in the river? Would you have the police detain the mother while you toss the children in the water yourself? I'm just curious?
It's not that I disagree that people take advantage of the system or that it doesn't need to be fixed. But the victims are the children. Not the deadbeat parents.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 10,999
- Reaction score
- 13,092
- Points
- 113
I watched that and of course I'm horrified. That's completely ridiculous. This is EXACTLY the kind of person who is attempting to take advantage of a system designed to help people who need help. This woman has gone beyond "needing help" and she is merely gaming the system. 15 kids? Seriously? Give her a nintendo so she has SOMETHING, ANYTHING else to entertain herself and her "fiance".
You'll note in my initial post that I said it is important to modify the programs to stop rewarding people for having multiple children and assuming they'll get increased benefits.
I don't disagree with the idea of simply putting a limit on the amount of benefit a person can receive or the amount of time a person can receive benefits. The problem will self-regulate. I also agree there are MANY people who would like to adopt healthy, happy babies.
It seems to me that there is a potential opportunity for things to work themselves out.
You'll note in my initial post that I said it is important to modify the programs to stop rewarding people for having multiple children and assuming they'll get increased benefits.
I don't disagree with the idea of simply putting a limit on the amount of benefit a person can receive or the amount of time a person can receive benefits. The problem will self-regulate. I also agree there are MANY people who would like to adopt healthy, happy babies.
It seems to me that there is a potential opportunity for things to work themselves out.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,458
- Reaction score
- 5,520
- Points
- 113
It's odd that there are so many abortions when such incentives exist, isn't it?
Aren't you arguing they really aren't unwanted?
I refuse to answer a sentence with a triple negative in it. Too much ******* work.
My mother was on WIC and foodstamps as she was a single mother of 2 after the divorce. We also had subsidized housing. She put herself through her PHD and was off of everything in 5 years. This is how the program works. You have skaters in every walk of life, but most people in this country want to better themselves.
The FBI needs to sit on the CF investigation until Trump takes office and then indict the Clintons so Obama can't pardon them.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
But there is nothing to pardon yet. Obama can't offer a future pardon or promise that the FBI will stand down after he leaves office. It's a beautiful thing. Unless Comey does a super quick indictment just to make sure Obama can pardon her.
****. Maybe he'll forget about Chelsea.
Similar threads
