Global Heat: Britain longest heatwave in 42 years, deadly heat in Japan and Arctic

[Confluence]

They finally got a new publisher and it is available now on Amazon. I just got mine. IMO it ends the theory that CO2 causes climate change. https://www.amazon.com/False-Alarm-Rex-Fleming/dp/1951008405/

cow farts

Sent from my SM-N950W using Steeler Nation mobile app

 

[madinsomniac]

MAJOR CLIMATE PAPER WITHDRAWN BY NATURE

A major scientific paper, which claimed to have found rapid warming in the oceans as a result of manmade global warming, has been withdrawn after an amateur climate scientist found major errors in its statistical methodology.

The paper, from a team led by Laure Resplandy of Princeton University, had received widespread uncritical publicity in the mainstream media when it was published because of its apparently alarming implications for the planet. However, within days of its publication in October 2018, independent scientist Nic Lewis found several serious flaws.

Yesterday, after nearly a year’s delay, the paper was officially withdrawn.

This is just the latest example of climate scientists letting themselves down by using incorrect statistics. The climate field needs to get professional statisticians involved up front if it is going to avoid this kind of embarrassment in future”.

Climatology is littered with examples of bad statistics, going back to the infamous Hockey Stick graph and beyond. Peer review is failing and it is falling to amateurs to find the errors. Scientists in the field should be embarrassed”.

https://www.thegwpf.com/major-climate-paper-withdrawn-by-nature/

Ill say this again and again... if i used the methods and math they use to formulate many of these theories in a report submitted to the EPA for an emission tests, the minimum they would do is reject it and make me retest... if it was intentionally misleading id face fines and prison time... many of these so call “peer checked” Farces wont list methodology used or even make raw data available to the public to be verified... those that do typically End up like this one, where those checking it find a very biased and often incorrect conclusion..

 

[CharlesDavenport]

The problem with most of the "scientists in the field" is that they depend on the false premise for their income.