- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,963
- Reaction score
- 9,373
- Points
- 113
oops is right
Iran backing out of the deal
- Thread starter Coach
- Start date
oops is right
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
Great news! Any time you see right-wingers' heads explode simultaneously, you can be assured something good has just happened. I believe this is such a case.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
Wow, I think this is the moment hell just literally froze over...
Bill O’Reilly Shocks Fox News Anchor By Expressing Support For Iran Deal
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015...reilly-expresses-support-iran-deal-give-shot/
A slew of Democratic lawmakers endorsed the tentative deal the United States and its international partners reached on Thursday to contain Iran’s nuclear program. But support for the agreement also came from an unusual source: Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly.
Appearing on the conservative network just minutes after President Barack Obama held a news conference in the White House Rose Garden laying out the broad outlines for how the United States hopes to limit Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, O’Reilly — a harsh critic of Obama’s foreign policy — argued that conservatives should give diplomacy a chance.
“You don’t want a war with Iran,” he explained. “You don’t want to bomb that country because the unintended consequences will set the world aflame. So if you can get something that’s decent, you give it a shot. I think that’s a legitimate point,” O’Reilly said to a surprised Gretchen Carlson, host of the network’s daytime show, The Real Story.
O’Reilly also warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against immediately rejecting the compromise, counseling the long-time opponent of talks to wait and see “specifically what the Iranians are going to agree to.”
Under the terms of the plan, Iran will suspend over two-thirds of its installed centrifuges and dilute or ship overseas its enriched uranium stocks. Iran has agreed to slash its centrifuges from 19,000 to 6,104 and not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent or build new facilities for enrichment for 15 years. It will, however, be able to continue “limited” research and development with advanced centrifuges.
Once inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirm that Iran has met its obligations, the United States, and the international community, will lift economic sanctions against the country. But those sanctions would “snap back into place” should Iran fail to meet its obligations, according to a fact sheet distributed by the White House. A final agreement — including all technical deals — is expected to be reached by June 30th. Experts estimate that while Iran will currently need 2 to 3 months to obtain enough fissile material to produce one nuclear weapon, under this agreement, that so-called “breakout timeline” will grow to at least one year for 10 years.
Speaking to reporters, Obama said that should Iran ultimately sign off on the final deal, “this framework would cut off every pathway Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon.” He stressed that Iran will face “more inspections than any other country in the world” and continue to live under U.S.-imposed sanctions for sponsoring terrorism, violating human rights, and threatening the state of Israel.
Bill O’Reilly Shocks Fox News Anchor By Expressing Support For Iran Deal
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015...reilly-expresses-support-iran-deal-give-shot/
A slew of Democratic lawmakers endorsed the tentative deal the United States and its international partners reached on Thursday to contain Iran’s nuclear program. But support for the agreement also came from an unusual source: Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly.
Appearing on the conservative network just minutes after President Barack Obama held a news conference in the White House Rose Garden laying out the broad outlines for how the United States hopes to limit Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, O’Reilly — a harsh critic of Obama’s foreign policy — argued that conservatives should give diplomacy a chance.
“You don’t want a war with Iran,” he explained. “You don’t want to bomb that country because the unintended consequences will set the world aflame. So if you can get something that’s decent, you give it a shot. I think that’s a legitimate point,” O’Reilly said to a surprised Gretchen Carlson, host of the network’s daytime show, The Real Story.
O’Reilly also warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against immediately rejecting the compromise, counseling the long-time opponent of talks to wait and see “specifically what the Iranians are going to agree to.”
Under the terms of the plan, Iran will suspend over two-thirds of its installed centrifuges and dilute or ship overseas its enriched uranium stocks. Iran has agreed to slash its centrifuges from 19,000 to 6,104 and not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent or build new facilities for enrichment for 15 years. It will, however, be able to continue “limited” research and development with advanced centrifuges.
Once inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirm that Iran has met its obligations, the United States, and the international community, will lift economic sanctions against the country. But those sanctions would “snap back into place” should Iran fail to meet its obligations, according to a fact sheet distributed by the White House. A final agreement — including all technical deals — is expected to be reached by June 30th. Experts estimate that while Iran will currently need 2 to 3 months to obtain enough fissile material to produce one nuclear weapon, under this agreement, that so-called “breakout timeline” will grow to at least one year for 10 years.
Speaking to reporters, Obama said that should Iran ultimately sign off on the final deal, “this framework would cut off every pathway Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon.” He stressed that Iran will face “more inspections than any other country in the world” and continue to live under U.S.-imposed sanctions for sponsoring terrorism, violating human rights, and threatening the state of Israel.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 15,612
- Reaction score
- 13,952
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
The only time I think a deal is actually good is when both sides hate it. Anytime one side thinks they won or both do there is a problem.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Iranians celebrate nuclear deal
Tehran residents rejoice and drivers honk their horns after the announcement of a landmark deal that will lift sanctions and avert the threat of war.
Iranians have reacted jubilantly to news of a breakthrough in nuclear negotiations, in the hope it will end years of international isolation and economic hardship
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/iranians-celebrate-nuclear-deal-tehran
------------------------
pass the hookah - it's party time
Tehran residents rejoice and drivers honk their horns after the announcement of a landmark deal that will lift sanctions and avert the threat of war.
Iranians have reacted jubilantly to news of a breakthrough in nuclear negotiations, in the hope it will end years of international isolation and economic hardship
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/iranians-celebrate-nuclear-deal-tehran
------------------------
pass the hookah - it's party time
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,963
- Reaction score
- 9,373
- Points
- 113
I believe you're a bit of a dumbass, Tibs. Sorry, but get real with this nonsense
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
Thank you! I'll take that as a compliment and as a sure sign I've got a good read on the situation...
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
I actually don't have a problem with helping the Persian people. They are NOT Arabs - in fact they hate Arabs. Arabs conquered Persia in the seventh century, spreading Islam.
and Persian chicks are hot
and Persian chicks are hot
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
of course the Jews might have a different opinion
ISRAEL WARNS OF ‘MILITARY OPTION’
Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz told Israel Radio Thursday: “…if we have no choice we have no choice… the military option is on the table."
ISRAEL WARNS OF ‘MILITARY OPTION’
Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz told Israel Radio Thursday: “…if we have no choice we have no choice… the military option is on the table."
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
hahahahaha - that didn't take long
who to believe? A bunch of liars bent on destroying the United States or the Iranians?
Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement
Says White House misleading Congress, American people with fact sheet
LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country’s leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.
Following a subsequent press conference by Secretary of State John Kerry—and release of a administration fact sheet on Iranian concessions—Zarif lashed out on Twitter over what he dubbed lies.
“The solutions are good for all, as they stand,” he tweeted. “There is no need to spin using ‘fact sheets’ so early on.”
Zarif went on to push back against claims by Kerry that the sanctions relief would be implemented in a phased fashion—and only after Iran verifies that it is not conducting any work on the nuclear weapons front.
Zarif, echoing previous comments, said the United States has promised an immediate termination of sanctions.
On Thursday evening, Zarif told reporters the latest agreement allows Iran to keep operating its nuclear program.
“None of those measures” that will move to scale back Iran’s program “include closing any of our facilities,” Zarif said. “We will continue enriching; we will continue research and development.”
“Our heavy water reactor will be modernized and we will continue the Fordow facility,” Zarif said. “We will have centrifuges installed in Fordow, but not enriching.”
The move to allow Iran to keep centrifuges at Fordow, a controversial onetime military site, has elicited concern that Tehran could ramp up its nuclear work with ease.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-accuses-u-s-of-lying-about-new-nuke-agreement/
who to believe? A bunch of liars bent on destroying the United States or the Iranians?
Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement
Says White House misleading Congress, American people with fact sheet
LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country’s leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.
Following a subsequent press conference by Secretary of State John Kerry—and release of a administration fact sheet on Iranian concessions—Zarif lashed out on Twitter over what he dubbed lies.
“The solutions are good for all, as they stand,” he tweeted. “There is no need to spin using ‘fact sheets’ so early on.”
Zarif went on to push back against claims by Kerry that the sanctions relief would be implemented in a phased fashion—and only after Iran verifies that it is not conducting any work on the nuclear weapons front.
Zarif, echoing previous comments, said the United States has promised an immediate termination of sanctions.
On Thursday evening, Zarif told reporters the latest agreement allows Iran to keep operating its nuclear program.
“None of those measures” that will move to scale back Iran’s program “include closing any of our facilities,” Zarif said. “We will continue enriching; we will continue research and development.”
“Our heavy water reactor will be modernized and we will continue the Fordow facility,” Zarif said. “We will have centrifuges installed in Fordow, but not enriching.”
The move to allow Iran to keep centrifuges at Fordow, a controversial onetime military site, has elicited concern that Tehran could ramp up its nuclear work with ease.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-accuses-u-s-of-lying-about-new-nuke-agreement/
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,963
- Reaction score
- 9,373
- Points
- 113
Mmm I'm sure you will..
Does anyone here actually believe that this regime, who believes that the destruction of Israel is necessary to herald the return of the Mahdi, and begin the golden age of Islamic enlightenment, will abide by a piece of paper?
That is a serious question.
That is a serious question.
Yeah good things like....
Pass Obamacare before we find out whats in it.
Benghazi attack.
The IRS scandal.
Fast and Furious.
Democrat race baiting.
Ferguson arsonists and looters.
Bashing the police.
Illegal immigration/illegal executive orders
Bergdahl the deserter swap for terrorists.
Islamic terrorism.
ISIS .......
You mean those good things that happened Tibs?
The only ones I currently see with their heads exploding are all those leftists whining about the Indiana religious rights law.
Certainly not. They will listen to Bomma's words. Much more powerful.
Fixed it for ya.
Left yourself wide open there chief........
Why is this "good"?
The only ones I currently see with their heads exploding are all those leftists whining about the Indiana religious rights law.[/QUOTE]
Well, there's important and then there's important. See, one privately owned bakery wishing to not be part of a homosexual celebration trumps an entire nation of religious zealots led by an evil madman that publicly stones homosexuals getting nukes. Duh.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
Because it's better than not having a deal in place, which has been the case up until now. It reels in the Iranians, places firm oversight on their programs. Simple as that. It's better than nothing, and nothing is a free pass to develop nukes. This makes it very difficult for them moving forward, and places stringent controls on the process. I really don't understand why anyone would be opposed to this.
Do you really believe any of that? Can anyone really be this obtuse?
Translation- The Iranians used this deal to remove economic sanctions, while buying time to continue developing nuclear weapons.
Why do you think Iran is celebrating this deal?
This "deal" was a slam dunk from the get go...
* Our chief negotiator, Sec of State Lurch Kerry's daughter is married to an Iranian with family still residing in Iran
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...ackmail//RK=0/RS=BOMsAP5H5R3z93.Oy.p05Wl6cfo-
* Our El Presidente has loaded his administration with muslims
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...iltrates/RK=0/RS=Yvjpr7vTFOBu6UVWav9uIxAS76w-
* The "main Lady" with El Presidente's ear is Iranian
* Our chief negotiator, Sec of State Lurch Kerry's daughter is married to an Iranian with family still residing in Iran
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...ackmail//RK=0/RS=BOMsAP5H5R3z93.Oy.p05Wl6cfo-
* Our El Presidente has loaded his administration with muslims
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...iltrates/RK=0/RS=Yvjpr7vTFOBu6UVWav9uIxAS76w-
* The "main Lady" with El Presidente's ear is Iranian
In plain English the deal sounds peachy keen, almost too good to believe.
The Iranians have always been genuine and sincere in the past so why not...
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/2/8336219/iran-nuclear-deal-plain-english
The Iranians have always been genuine and sincere in the past so why not...
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/2/8336219/iran-nuclear-deal-plain-english
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Bizarre that we are "negotiating" with Iran while they still hold American Marine vet Amir Hekmati prisoner.
