• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Iran backing out of the deal

Because it's better than not having a deal in place, which has been the case up until now. It reels in the Iranians, places firm oversight on their programs. Simple as that. It's better than nothing, and nothing is a free pass to develop nukes. This makes it very difficult for them moving forward, and places stringent controls on the process. I really don't understand why anyone would be opposed to this.


All one needs to ask to see this agreement for the sham that it is....... is who will inspect them and hold them to this "deal"?
 
Translation- The Iranians used this deal to remove economic sanctions, while buying time to continue developing nuclear weapons.
Why do you think Iran is celebrating this deal?

This deal stinks like ***** house at low tide. The USA is not allowed to inspect any of Iran's military sites. Re-read that twice and ask yourself what value did the USA gain?
 
who will inspect them and hold them to this "deal"?

he doesn't care - he's dumping the future of the world so he can claim his 'legacy"

he'll try and carve his pharoh image in everything, you watch
 
Last edited:
Because it's better than not having a deal

the let Congress have a say - like a democracy - not a writ from a king


Support Growing To Give Congress A Vote On Iran Deal

The Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said Sunday he’s within a few votes of being able to override a threatened presidential veto of his bill giving Congress a say in any nuclear deal with Iran.

Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee predicted “strong, bipartisan support” when his committee takes up the bill on April 14. The measure would give Congress 60 days to review a final agreement with Iran before any congressional sanctions could be suspended.

Republican leaders have given no indication of when the measure might be taken up on the Senate floor, assuming it passes committee. President Barack Obama has promised to veto the bill.

Overriding a veto would need 67 votes in the 100-member Senate.

“We’ve got 64 or 65 that we’re aware of today, if that were the case,” Corker said on the “Fox News Sunday” program. “I talked to a number of Democrats over the weekend, and I think there are many more that are considering this.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...rt-growing-to-give-congress-vote-on-iran-deal
 
Last edited:
Top