Obama told his chief cyber security person to stand down during Russia hack attempts?

[Coach]

Obama told his chief cyber security person to stand down during Russia hack attempts. Yikes!

Why would Obama do this?


https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyb...204935758.html


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-2016-election


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/...-stand-russia/

 

[IndySteel]

He also told his chief military personnel to stand down when they had open opportunities to attack ISIS.

 

[CharlesDavenport]

Obama told his chief cyber security person to stand down during Russia hack attempts. Yikes!

Why would Obama do this?


https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyb...204935758.html


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-2016-election


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/...-stand-russia/

And they say Trump is treasonous..

 

[Coach]

He also told his chief military personnel to stand down when they had open opportunities to attack ISIS.

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort.

Definition of Treason :The betrayal of one's own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.

This is very serious, as Barack Hussein Obama should at the very least be subject to an investigation..

 

[Superman]

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort.

Definition of Treason :The betrayal of one's own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.

This is very serious, as Barack Hussein Obama should at the very least be subject to an investigation..

how dare ye question FBP?!?!?!?!?!
Where's Burgundy?

 

[Steelworth]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyb...204935758.html


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-2016-election


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/...-stand-russia/

None of those links are valid.

 

[CharlesDavenport]

None of those links are valid.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...red-stand-down-russian-meddling-2016-election

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cy...ssian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html

 

[Steelworth]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...red-stand-down-russian-meddling-2016-election

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cy...ssian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html

There we go, thanks.

 

[Elfiero]

Bombshell report: Donald Trump was shown definitive proof Putin ordered cyber attacks on the U.S.

My....my....just how much fear does the orange fuckface have for his boss in Moscow?

All the way back on January 6, 2017, two weeks before Donald Trump even put his tiny hand on Lincoln’s Bible to take the Oath of Office, U.S. Intelligence services had a serious sit-down with the president-elect to show him highly classified intel that definitively proved Vladimir Putin had personally ordered the cyber attacks and propaganda campaign aimed at tilting the 2016 election to Donald Trump. From the New York Times:

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

Donald Trump has seen definitive proof from U.S. Intelligence agencies that Russia was actively (and successfully) working to subvert our election but he has done absolutely nothing about it, still choosing to side with a foreign enemy over our own intelligence agencies. Congress should immediately investigate Donald Trump and his refusal to accept the evidence and the reasoning behind his curious cowering to Vladimir Putin before the entire world.

Only five days ago, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats issued a dire warning about the ongoing attacks from Russia:

"The warning signs are there. The system is blinking. It is why I believe we are at a critical point," Coats said, addressing the Hudson Institute in Washington, DC, on Friday.
"Today, the digital infrastructure that serves this country is literally under attack," he said.
Coats compared the "warning signs" to those the United States faced ahead of the September 11 terrorist attacks.
"It was in the months prior to September 2001 when, according to then-CIA Director George Tenet, the system is blinking red. And here we are nearly two decades later, and I'm here to say, the warning lights are blinking red again," Coats said.
Donald Trump is given a briefing on the most serious intel every single day and only days after Dan Coats issued that very serious public warning, what did Trump have to say when a reporter asked him if he believed Russia was still attacking the United States? Trump shockingly said “no.”

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/1781882

 

[Spike]

Old news, swept under the rug


Obama Was Briefed On Russian Hacking But Did Nothing

December 13, 2016

In the extensive report on the massive Russian-backed operation to hack American political and government severs—including a successful hack of the Democratic National Committee's server—the paper reveals that President Barack Obama had been "briefed regularly" on Russia's effort to target servers at the State Department, the White House, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff

"We'd have all these circular meetings," one senior State Department official said, "in which everyone agreed you had to push back at the Russians and push back hard. But it didn't happen."

https://www.weeklystandard.com/obama-was-briefed-on-russian-hacking-but-did-nothing/article/2005837#!

 

[Steelin]

The New York Slimes? Propoganda outlet #1.

Did anyone read the recent analysis about TWA 800? The Slimes was a key player in the misinformation campaign.

 

[Spike]

BOOM!


Lisa Page Confirms: The Chinese, Not the Russians Hacked Hillary’s Emails

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Blackberry was hacked by the Chinese, according to Peter Strzok’s mistress Lisa Page, who testified behind closed doors about her role in Operation Crossfire Hurricane.

While her boyfriend Strzok stonewalled Congress, Page was open to cooperating behind the scenes with Republican lawmakers. Ohio’s Jim Jordan led the way in getting Page into backdoor meetings where she aided investigators in their probe of Page and Strzok’s collusion against the Trump government.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/lisa-...nese-not-the-russians-hacked-hillarys-emails/

 

[Spike]

BAM!


Dem Panic: Page May Seek Immunity Deal To Come Clean on Strzok, McCabe, Even Comey

Experts including Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch believe Page may be willing to cut a deal that gives her leeway to unload the truth about what went on behind the FBI’s doors.

By simply cooperating with a congressional panel, Page would take a very different approach than the man she was constantly texting, and that could spell disaster for liberals if Trump’s claims of widespread Department of Justice corruption are true.

“She’s seen from last week what her boyfriend was doing, and she’s probably a pretty sharp attorney. She sees an opportunity or an opening to kind of recast herself, and I think she’s taking advantage of it,” Farrell said.

He may be right on target with that assessment. Page already has spoken to several members of Congress regarding the scandal, and while those discussions were not public, participants hinted that the FBI attorney was indeed more forthcoming than Strzok.

Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, for instance, told reporters on Friday that Page’s “willingness to cooperate today speaks well of her.”

Another Republican lawmaker, Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas, echoed that tone and said he believes Page is “a very forthcoming witness.”

“She gave us a lot of new information that we didn’t have before. That will lead us to ask for some more people to make some more requests for information we do not yet have,” Ratcliffe said.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/d...voice&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2018-07-19

 

[hamster]

BAM!


Dem Panic: Page May Seek Immunity Deal To Come Clean on Strzok, McCabe, Even Comey

Experts including Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch believe Page may be willing to cut a deal that gives her leeway to unload the truth about what went on behind the FBI’s doors.

By simply cooperating with a congressional panel, Page would take a very different approach than the man she was constantly texting, and that could spell disaster for liberals if Trump’s claims of widespread Department of Justice corruption are true.

“She’s seen from last week what her boyfriend was doing, and she’s probably a pretty sharp attorney. She sees an opportunity or an opening to kind of recast herself, and I think she’s taking advantage of it,” Farrell said.

He may be right on target with that assessment. Page already has spoken to several members of Congress regarding the scandal, and while those discussions were not public, participants hinted that the FBI attorney was indeed more forthcoming than Strzok.

Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, for instance, told reporters on Friday that Page’s “willingness to cooperate today speaks well of her.”

Another Republican lawmaker, Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas, echoed that tone and said he believes Page is “a very forthcoming witness.”

“She gave us a lot of new information that we didn’t have before. That will lead us to ask for some more people to make some more requests for information we do not yet have,” Ratcliffe said.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/d...voice&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2018-07-19

You go girl! Time to come clean.

 

[hamster]

Experts including Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch believe Page may be willing to cut a deal that gives her leeway to unload the truth about what went on behind the FBI’s doors.

Judicial Watch is getting more information, sad as it is, through the FOIA, than the oversight committees can get through proper channels.The system is broken, and needs to be fixed. Both parties will benefit, if they can momentarily put their differences aside.

 

[Sarge]

Judicial Watch is getting more information, sad as it is, through the FOIA, than the oversight committees can get through proper channels.The system is broken, and needs to be fixed. Both parties will benefit, if they can momentarily put their differences aside.

All of these people in the alphabet departments that are defying congressional subpoenas need arrested and locked up. This is no different than dealing with kids. Kids will act out or be defiant when there are no consequences. When the Justice Department, for example, defies a subpoena for documents or whatever, what happens? Trey Gowdy or Devin Nunez goes on TV and whines about it. What the **** does that accomplish? Grab the ****** defying the subpoena and put that person in jail until they comply with the subpoena. They would lock you or me away in a ******* heart beat. But government officials? Still obviously above the laws of the peasants.

 

[Superman]

Bombshell report: Donald Trump was shown definitive proof Putin ordered cyber attacks on the U.S.

My....my....just how much fear does the orange fuckface have for his boss in Moscow?

All the way back on January 6, 2017, two weeks before Donald Trump even put his tiny hand on Lincoln’s Bible to take the Oath of Office, U.S. Intelligence services had a serious sit-down with the president-elect to show him highly classified intel that definitively proved Vladimir Putin had personally ordered the cyber attacks and propaganda campaign aimed at tilting the 2016 election to Donald Trump. From the New York Times:

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

Donald Trump has seen definitive proof from U.S. Intelligence agencies that Russia was actively (and successfully) working to subvert our election but he has done absolutely nothing about it, still choosing to side with a foreign enemy over our own intelligence agencies. Congress should immediately investigate Donald Trump and his refusal to accept the evidence and the reasoning behind his curious cowering to Vladimir Putin before the entire world.

Only five days ago, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats issued a dire warning about the ongoing attacks from Russia:

"The warning signs are there. The system is blinking. It is why I believe we are at a critical point," Coats said, addressing the Hudson Institute in Washington, DC, on Friday.
"Today, the digital infrastructure that serves this country is literally under attack," he said.
Coats compared the "warning signs" to those the United States faced ahead of the September 11 terrorist attacks.
"It was in the months prior to September 2001 when, according to then-CIA Director George Tenet, the system is blinking red. And here we are nearly two decades later, and I'm here to say, the warning lights are blinking red again," Coats said.
Donald Trump is given a briefing on the most serious intel every single day and only days after Dan Coats issued that very serious public warning, what did Trump have to say when a reporter asked him if he believed Russia was still attacking the United States? Trump shockingly said “no.”

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/1781882

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/3o6vXPJaZrpSKGfmGk" width="480" height="263" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/nbcagt-nbc-agt-3o6vXPJaZrpSKGfmGk">via GIPHY</a></p>

 

[Roy92040]

Sounds like contempt of congress which I think is punishable

 

[bmoritz]

Bombshell report: Donald Trump was shown definitive proof Putin ordered cyber attacks on the U.S.

My....my....just how much fear does the orange fuckface have for his boss in Moscow?

All the way back on January 6, 2017, two weeks before Donald Trump even put his tiny hand on Lincoln’s Bible to take the Oath of Office, U.S. Intelligence services had a serious sit-down with the president-elect to show him highly classified intel that definitively proved Vladimir Putin had personally ordered the cyber attacks and propaganda campaign aimed at tilting the 2016 election to Donald Trump. From the New York Times:

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

Donald Trump has seen definitive proof from U.S. Intelligence agencies that Russia was actively (and successfully) working to subvert our election but he has done absolutely nothing about it, still choosing to side with a foreign enemy over our own intelligence agencies. Congress should immediately investigate Donald Trump and his refusal to accept the evidence and the reasoning behind his curious cowering to Vladimir Putin before the entire world.

Only five days ago, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats issued a dire warning about the ongoing attacks from Russia:

"The warning signs are there. The system is blinking. It is why I believe we are at a critical point," Coats said, addressing the Hudson Institute in Washington, DC, on Friday.
"Today, the digital infrastructure that serves this country is literally under attack," he said.
Coats compared the "warning signs" to those the United States faced ahead of the September 11 terrorist attacks.
"It was in the months prior to September 2001 when, according to then-CIA Director George Tenet, the system is blinking red. And here we are nearly two decades later, and I'm here to say, the warning lights are blinking red again," Coats said.
Donald Trump is given a briefing on the most serious intel every single day and only days after Dan Coats issued that very serious public warning, what did Trump have to say when a reporter asked him if he believed Russia was still attacking the United States? Trump shockingly said “no.”

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/1781882

Who was president when this happened **** Face?