http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001662
The patriotic POTUS does it again. Sorry posting this on my phone.
The patriotic POTUS does it again. Sorry posting this on my phone.
Obama welcomes Castro's Criticism of America: 'I Personally Would Not Disagree'
- Thread starter Steelin
- Start date
Bammy still talking like he hasn't been running the joint for 8 years.
I think a breach in the democrats is coming... I think it will be every bit as divisive as the one happening with the republicans right now...
Nah, the Gimme Free **** Party sticks together when it comes to gimme free ****.
By all means. Let's take a lesson from Kooba. Then, if we get lucky, the libs will head that way in rafts made of garbage.
The media certainly has played an important part in failing to report the truth on both sides. He was never properly vetted. I don't think that America would've elected him if he had been.
It was far more important to elect the First Black President.
"And hopefully that we can learn from each other."
Right Barry, there's a lot we could learn from Cuba...a treasure trove of knowledge and innovation just 90 miles off our coast and we never even knew it.
Right Barry, there's a lot we could learn from Cuba...a treasure trove of knowledge and innovation just 90 miles off our coast and we never even knew it.
I feel more racist after reading this thread.
There, fixed it for ya!
Remarkably, on the day where Brussels is attacked and panty-waist Obama bows before Castro, Tibs, Jewfierican, and Steel Vanguard are all absent.
Look, I was all for exploring re-establishing Cuban relations, but at a cost to them... there had to be major concessions in human rights before we went back in there... I hate how both parties burn bargaining chips like firewood trying to pave the way for their corporate masters and ideological puppet masters...
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Obama clearly has daddy issues with commies and socialists. Always seeking their approval.
Well then. My work here is done.
......and legacy burnishing. Don't forget legacy burnishing!
The biggest sopping vagina to ever reside at the WH.
Apologies to vaginas everywhere.
Apologies to vaginas everywhere.
Panty-waist is exactly the term that I was thinking of lol.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,606
- Reaction score
- 29,989
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Obama thinks that the Cubans have a lot of good ideas, and that Republicans are the devil.
To anybody who doubts that point, please find an instance where Obama was this critical of Cuba:
“I cannot think of a more potent recruitment tool for ISIL than some of the rhetoric coming out of here in the course of this debate. It’s counterproductive and it needs to stop.”
http://time.com/4118395/barack-obama-republicans-isis-refugees/
So Republicans are a recruitment tool for ISIS ... what's the worst thing he has said about Cuba, and its dozens of political prisoners, including 50 pro-democracy dissidents who were beaten and detained just hours before Obama landed in Cuba?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/03/21/castro-implies-no-political-prisoners-in-cuba/
So according to Obama, Cuba = awesomeness, Republicans = ISIS recruiting tool.
To anybody who doubts that point, please find an instance where Obama was this critical of Cuba:
“I cannot think of a more potent recruitment tool for ISIL than some of the rhetoric coming out of here in the course of this debate. It’s counterproductive and it needs to stop.”
http://time.com/4118395/barack-obama-republicans-isis-refugees/
So Republicans are a recruitment tool for ISIS ... what's the worst thing he has said about Cuba, and its dozens of political prisoners, including 50 pro-democracy dissidents who were beaten and detained just hours before Obama landed in Cuba?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/03/21/castro-implies-no-political-prisoners-in-cuba/
So according to Obama, Cuba = awesomeness, Republicans = ISIS recruiting tool.
Why doesn't he just move there if he thinks it's so great?
When you're at the top of the Communist food chain it IS great.
Steel Vanguard
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,175
- Reaction score
- 540
- Points
- 113
It amazes me the vitriol.
The ENTIRE WESTERN WORLD has gone leftist. At least HALF of America has gone leftist. You guys are crying about something that happened THIRTY YEARS AGO. The right wing ship has sailed. The only right wingers left are Putin and the Islamic radicals. And you hate them, for some bizarre reason.
You lost. But you lost a long time ago.
The ENTIRE WESTERN WORLD has gone leftist. At least HALF of America has gone leftist. You guys are crying about something that happened THIRTY YEARS AGO. The right wing ship has sailed. The only right wingers left are Putin and the Islamic radicals. And you hate them, for some bizarre reason.
You lost. But you lost a long time ago.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,606
- Reaction score
- 29,989
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
So you are wrong, and apparently too lazy to conduct even basic research on a point you assert.
Further, your comment about conservative Americans, Putin and Muslim extremists shows once again that you do not view conservatives as simply having a different political and life view than you; you think conservatives are evil.
Do you know whose philosophy you are following? Saul Alinsky, who proposed the technique of personalizing and polarizing the political opposition 45 years ago:
"Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame."
The left has employed this technique for generations, leading to the present environment where the left views conservatives as evil. The real problem, of course, is that when you believe your opponent is evil, then you are free to do whatever you want to oppose the enemy. Look at the behavior of protesters who disrupt conservative events - they believe that yelling profanity in front of young children, rushing the stage, blocking traffic, shouting, threats, etc. are acceptable.
Why? Because the ideological opponent is evil. It is that simple.
So does the tactic of labeling the ideological opponent as evil advance the debate? Of course not. And what is now happening - and what the left is squealing about - is that conservatives appear to have had enough of this ****, and are not going to let the protesters have their way. That has led to the scuffles we have recently seen and that promises to get even worse.
The simple fact is that you are a follower of the ideological approach that permits - no, in fact it promotes - the name-calling, confrontations, physical altercations and overt hostility that dominates politics today.
The problem is not that Republicans are evil, or that racism dominates the ideology of your political opponents; the problem is that the Alinsky method now dominates the left, to the point that they believe Republicans are murderous Nazis and of course there are no limits on what you can do or say to oppose murderous Nazis ... right?
Last edited:
Similar threads
