• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

******* officiating

Yeah, that was the holly roller play.
 
Those refs were hookers on crack… i know i overbitched about them, but Hoculi jrs crew always is lop sided in calls… and we aren’t on the league’s favorites list these days…

The bungle fans had tge gall to ***** about them too … they had about 20 major no calls betweethe obvious holding and the pass interference… I don’t care if they let them play, as long as that goes both ways… and it didn’t…

The only call they can really ***** about was the chase catch that should have been ruled a td.. but tgey could have challenged that.. everyone was expecting them to
 
Litos said:
why was the fumble on burrow called dead at the 50 yard line? the one that perine recovered and ran for about 10 yards
Click to expand...
SteelBuckeye said:
Under two minutes left in a half and only the player who fumbled it can advance it for the fumbling team. If the ball is fumbled backwards and another player from the fumbling team recovers it, the ball is marked dead at the spot of the recovery.
*That's the explanation that Gene whatshisnameitori, the CBS rules analyst, gave.
Click to expand...
If an offensive player fumbles the ball another offensive player cannot pick it up and advance it, only fall on it where it is.
 
Ron Burgundy said:
If an offensive player fumbles the ball another offensive player cannot pick it up and advance it, only fall on it where it is.
Click to expand...
In the last two minutes of the game, that is… any other time its ok… it’s been around since tge 70’s… i was ready to lose it when they were going to spot him the yards
 
madinsomniac said:
Those refs were hookers on crack… i know i overbitched about them, but Hoculi jrs crew always is lop sided in calls
Click to expand...

Hochuli should just change his first name to "****" because about 10 million times per year football fans say "**** Hochuli!"
 
black and gold apex said:
What made no sense not one call for holding as we saw plenty of it when we're pressuring the Bungals, then the last few minutes the amount of calls on one side of the ball
Click to expand...
this was the most telling thing… the Bengals gave up seven sacks and a bunch more hits… they had a bunch of rookies… and new players.. when was the last time a oline under siege like that was not called for holding? There were a bunch of obvious ones.. a couple the announcers even tried to incorrectly explain away… they were just protecting Joe Exotic and trying to prop up his star … the more star qbs tge better for the league..
 
madinsomniac said:
this was the most telling thing… the Bengals gave up seven sacks and a bunch more hits… they had a bunch of rookies… and new players.. when was the last time a oline under siege like that was not called for holding? There were a bunch of obvious ones.. a couple the announcers even tried to incorrectly explain away… they were just protecting Joe Exotic and trying to prop up his star … the more star qbs tge better for the league..
Click to expand...

Would not ask the CBS crew anything about football. They did not even know about the rule barring advancing a fumble recovery by offensive player unless it is the same guy who fumbled the ball.

I would, however, trust their opinion on what Joe Burrows' ball sack tastes like.
 
Confluence said:
Geez, its hard to have folks over during a game who are not football fans. Perhaps the wife needs a little guidance.
Like the Steelers need guidance on getting an OC who knows more football than your guests today.
Click to expand...

EXCELLENT post and you're right ya know !!!



Salute the nation
 
Steeltime said:
Yeah, Buckeye is correct. The rule was enacted due to the Raiders intentionally fumbling the ball into the endzone against San Diego and recovering for a TD on the last play a looooong time ago.

I knew the rule and right away knew the ball was going back to the spot where Perine recovered the fumble. The announcers didn't know the rule.

Yeah, I guess knowing the ******* rules is not a requirement for those dipshits. What a joke.
Click to expand...


Funny you mention it but the announcers were ****-ing jag-offs when it came to know simple football rules. That goal line catch and out of bounds was the correct call but the announcers comented that he had his foot inside the goal line and that was a touchdown. If BOTH feet where across the goal line then yes but it was only one and the other out of bounds.

There were several instances where they ****** up and even at times I wandered who the bungles were even playing as all they talked about was the bungles.


Salute the nation
 
speedicut said:
And that idiot Ian Eagle was trying to announce the result of the big plays before play was over and was wrong every time.
That got annoying quick...
Click to expand...
I find Charles Davis even worse. Surprised anyone could understand him with Burrows balls constantly in his mouth.
 
nooneuno said:
I find Charles Davis even worse. Surprised anyone could understand him with Burrows balls constantly in his mouth.
Click to expand...
Lol. I said the same thing. These guys were slurping all game. At this point they are breaking down the dried up jizz and snorting the bengals **** sand.


Maybe it was Greg Lloyd or Jack Lambert. But the media sure hates the Steelers lol
 
MTC said:
Lol. I said the same thing. These guys were slurping all game. At this point they are breaking down the dried up jizz and snorting the bengals **** sand.


Maybe it was Greg Lloyd or Jack Lambert. But the media sure hates the Steelers lol
Click to expand...
No they dont. God these stupid ******* takes get more and more tiresome with each passing season. "Ooohhhh such and such just HATES the Steelers, the *******(s)!!!" God, shut the **** up already, every ******* fanbase has mouth-breathers that spouts this stupid ****
 
.
Drink IRON City said:
Funny you mention it but the announcers were ****-ing jag-offs when it came to know simple football rules. That goal line catch and out of bounds was the correct call but the announcers comented that he had his foot inside the goal line and that was a touchdown. If BOTH feet where across the goal line then yes but it was only one and the other out of bounds.

There were several instances where they ****** up and even at times I wandered who the bungles were even playing as all they talked about was the bungles.


Salute the nation
Click to expand...
that's the good thing of watching the Latinamerican transmission, the announcers know how big the Steelers fandom is down the border.
 
Drink IRON City said:
Funny you mention it but the announcers were ****-ing jag-offs when it came to know simple football rules. That goal line catch and out of bounds was the correct call but the announcers comented that he had his foot inside the goal line and that was a touchdown. If BOTH feet where across the goal line then yes but it was only one and the other out of bounds.

There were several instances where they ****** up and even at times I wandered who the bungles were even playing as all they talked about was the bungles.


Salute the nation
Click to expand...
Actually Drink it doesn’t matter where the feet are in play. Only where the ball is. If the ball crossed the plane, while the player was running parallel to the goal with one foot in the end zone and one in the field of play it would be a TD because the ball crossed the plane. Which is why most try to dive over when they are getting hit. As soon as the ball breaks the plane, play is dead, no chance of fumble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top