not sure, I don't follow it that closely. Maybe a handful, if that. Pitt is in an unique situation, for sure.
Heinz Field is a great stadium and it seems that the only people who dislike it are those from Pittsburgh.
.
It's better than many college stadiums but it lacks college football atmosphere during Pitt games.
I don't dislike Hienz Field but I'm disappointed with it. There's a reason the rotundas are popular places to watch the game even though you have to stand the whole time.
I'm really not sure what you're trying to get at about the rotundas. Some people just enjoy watching the game from those spots, but the seating areas are great. I've sat in virtually every location in the stadium and have zero complaints about any of them.
Too many posts to quote, so I'll just leave this here...
Regarding riding busses: All Pitt Staff, Faculty and Students can ride Port Authority transportation for free...including the inclines..(ID required). Pitt has shuttles for the students to go from Oakland to Heinz Field...which is why the student section is pretty full for most games. Students aren't the issue, the rest of the public is the issue.
Regarding the on-campus stadium: Nearly every building on the lower end of campus is a national historic landmark. Good luck trying to find a space for a stadium. Pitt had space at the "top of the hill," but desperately needed the upgraded facilities for baseball and women's softball (Welcome to the ACC)... they needed those more than they needed a new football stadium. There is ONE spot you could use, but it would be expensive to get and nearly impossible to get to on a game day... Panther Hollow. It's not going to happen.
Regarding the coaching change: I was in Chancellor Gallagher's office last week and the appointment immediately following me was Paul Chryst...we kind of knew it all along. I'll give you a quote from a "higher-up" here: "we will have a difficult time finding a good replacement coach if Steve's still here." Local media saying it was a "big surprise" that Pederson was let go...uninformed. Any reporter worth his weight in lead would have known.
What successful programs use a NFL or not there own stadium? Miami? USC & UCLA? I'm trying to think of some.
Not one...
The Rose Bowl (UCLA) is not an NFL stadium per se...even though the Rams used it for a while
The Coliseum (USC) is an on-campus stadium, actually
Miami (FL) has not done anything since moving from the Orange Bowl...
There are no successful programs utilizing professional stadiums...
When I first saw Heinz field I thought they compromised so it could host soccer games as well. It hasn't to my knowledge so I guess they made the sideline areas so wide as to accommodate vehicles, camera crews, security, press, etc. that's good for them, bad for fans.
The lower level has a very gradual slope which makes many of the lower seats not very good when the action is on the opposite end of the field. This problem isn't exclusive to Hienz field, but seems worse than other Stadiums.
There is no overhang of the upper level so the seats start where the lower level seats end pushing them further away from the field. This makes for a big concourse, which is convenient, but at a cost of making the seats worse.
That maybe true but can you in anyway attribute the success of the program to where they play? Or is this another relationship like how many successful programs play on orange grass. I really doubt changing the location of where the games are played would have any bearing on the program at all. It was successful when Joe Pa coached the team and they played in a pro football stadium so that would seem to cancel your argument.
Now if you mean that success can only be measured by playing for the so called national championship then nothing matters as that is about as real as fantasy football or professional wrestling.
I don't know if you can or not...somebody above asked if any "successful" teams are utilizing professional stadiums... the answer is no. Is there a correlation? I don't know if there is or not...but the surface-level evidence is that you probably aren't going to be successful.
Now, the one you might look at that for correlation is the University of Miami. They had tremendous success in the Orange Bowl, but have been a dumpster fire since moving to (Insert new name here) Stadium. The reality is that the Hurricanes have just been a bad football program since they moved away with poor coaching, poor leadership and poor recruiting. Would they still be that if in the Orange Bowl? Probably...but attendance like this probably doesn't help in recruiting either...
http://www.ngngsports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/miami1.jpg
Sounding like Pitt is going after MIchigan State DC, Pat Narduzzi. He played at Youngstown State when his dad was head coach. His dad got fired for some dude named Tressel who won 4 Div 2 championships there.
.