I and others have many times in this thread; you keep blowing off the question. You respond with, "personnel decisions are different, let's talk gameplanning"
Yet again.. the offensive gameplan sucks. Nothing but short throws; even on third-and-long, we throw a 4-yard pass into coverage. Too much run-run-curl-punt. The stale blitz packages that never work anymore without good pass rushers. The cushions in coverage. The fourth-quarter punt and the FGs are kinda judgement calls but not really. Statistically speaking, the chances of making a 4th-and-short are much better than people think, and the benefit of three points is much lower than people think. Especially when you're down by multiple scores, which Tomlin never cares about.
We play FOR field goals. Once we hit the 30, we take our foot of the gas playcalling-wise and just thank the opposing team for the FG attempt.
The on-field play stems at least in part from coaching. Marcus Gilbert clearly sucks, so why not alter the blocking scheme? Jarvis and Worilds can't win their battles, so why not blitz a DB or something? The secondary is sitting deep to wipe out the deep ball, so why not use liberal play-action? And so on.
When it's a constant miscue. If a team is heavily penalized for years and years in a row, I start to wonder.
And once again what was missed two wide open short passes that our franchise QB missed. One is possibly a TD. Thats on coaching. Your saying the line sucks but you want to call longer routes that take more time to get open.
You want to go for it 4th and long inside your own 35 or whatever it was just because...
Play action. Oh that thing that works when you establish a running game.
Like I said arguing drafts free agent signings is one thing. Arguing guys not doing their job is another. Players have to make plays. They didnt tonite and not becsuse the coaches didnt have them in position. They got beaten. Cant say they werent prepared they drove right down the field til Brown turned into a *****. But wait thats on coaching i bet.