Stupid Liberals Would Rather See Women Get Raped

[Tim Steelersfan]

The Zionists in Israel commit atrocities regularly. The Chinese commit atrocities regularly. The FARC and other rebel groups in Latin America commit atrocities regularly. The Mexican drug cartels, which are bizarrely VERY religious, commit atrocities regularly. The Burmese commit atrocities regularly. The Russian and Ukrainian militias commit atrocities regularly. Islam has absolutely NO monopoly on violence or heinous acts in the modern world. They are just a convenient scapegoat for American demagogues. Lots of people murder other people en mass for a wide variety of reasons. I don't think Dylan Roof's reasons for killing a bunch of people in a church are any more sound than Nidal Hasan's reasons for killing a bunch of my brothers and sisters at Fort Hood.

You're the one who seems to think that one senseless killing is somehow more or less justified than another based on the ideology of the killer. And I disagree.

Condemn radical Islam on this thread, instead of perpetually defending Muslims in general. And suggest means by which we eliminate it and the jihad they have waged against you, me, and the rest of the non-believers.

Then perhaps someone, anyone here, will take you seriously.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

Condemn radical Islam on this thread, instead of perpetually defending Muslims in general. And suggest means by which we eliminate it and the jihad they have waged against you, me, and the rest of the non-believers.

Then perhaps someone, anyone here, will take you seriously.

Not that it will make a difference but...

I, STEEL VANGUARD, HEREBY CONDEMN AND DENOUNCE RADICAL ISLAM, IT'S FOLLOWERS, AND ALL ACTS OF VIOLENCE IN IT'S NAME.

Happy?

But it doesn't matter. I don't hear you condemning Israeli Apartheid, or the atrocities committed by the Israelis. You don't hate radicalism or violence. You're a bigot who hates Muslims, and you're HIDING behind claims of opposing radicalism.

You want to end Radical Islam? Great. Start by ending the thing that started it: The Israeli Apartheid State.

 

[hamster]

The Burmese. Really? Really.

Do the Burmese threaten Nigeria?
Do the Burmese threaten Somalia?
Do the Burmese threaten Libya?
Do the Burmese threaten the Phillipines?
Do the Burmese threaten Kenya?
Do the Burmese threaten the UK?
Do the Burmese threaten the United States?
Do the Burmese threaten Spain?
Do the Burmese threaten Israel?
Do the Burmese threaten Syria?
Do the Burmese threaten Iraq?
Do the Burmese threaten Yemen?
Do the Burmese threaten the Netherlands?
Do the Burmese threaten Egypt?
Do the Burmese threaten Sweden?
Do the Burmese threaten Italy?
Do the Burmese threaten Turkey?
Do the Burmese threaten Afghanistan?
Do the Burmese threaten Chechnya?
Do the Burmese threaten Bosnia?

My fingers are tired.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

You want to end Radical Islam? Great. Start by ending the thing that started it: The Israeli Apartheid State.

You have now eliminated yourself from any further intelligent discourse. That is sheer ignorance. You have no idea of what you speak.

Radical Islamists have been around for centuries. Go research the Barbary Pirates as but one example. Israel is an incredibly recent phenomenon. Radical Islam is centuries old.

You're no longer worth debating, because you don't understand the basis of the discussion.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

The Burmese. Really? Really.

Do the Burmese threaten Nigeria?
Do the Burmese threaten Somalia?
Do the Burmese threaten Libya?
Do the Burmese threaten the Phillipines?
Do the Burmese threaten Kenya?
Do the Burmese threaten the UK?
Do the Burmese threaten the United States?
Do the Burmese threaten Spain?
Do the Burmese threaten Israel?
Do the Burmese threaten Syria?
Do the Burmese threaten Iraq?
Do the Burmese threaten Yemen?
Do the Burmese threaten the Netherlands?
Do the Burmese threaten Egypt?
Do the Burmese threaten Sweden?
Do the Burmese threaten Italy?
Do the Burmese threaten Turkey?
Do the Burmese threaten Afghanistan?
Do the Burmese threaten Chechnya?
Do the Burmese threaten Bosnia?

My fingers are tired.

You're changing the subject AGAIN.

You said ONE RELIGION has a monopoly on atrocities. That is PATENTLY FALSE. You're trying to create some great boogeyman to attack so you can justify your prejudice.

You have now eliminated yourself from any further intelligent discourse. That is sheer ignorance. You have no idea of what you speak.

Radical Islamists have been around for centuries. Go research the Barbary Pirates as but one example. Israel is an incredibly recent phenomenon. Radical Islam is centuries old.

You're no longer worth debating, because you don't understand the basis of the discussion.

Aaaaaaaaaannnnnd I win.

Thank you for capitulating. It's nice to know you understand that you lost.

 

[hamster]

You're changing the subject AGAIN.

You said ONE RELIGION has a monopoly on atrocities. That is PATENTLY FALSE. You're trying to create some great boogeyman to attack so you can justify your prejudice.

.

Sorry I'm late in responding. There was a Burmese Atrocity Team setting up on my front lawn. I shooed them away with a broom. Thank God you warned me about them.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

Sorry I'm late in responding. There was a Burmese Atrocity Team setting up on my front lawn. I shooed them away with a broom. Thank God you warned me about them.

And when was the last time there was an Radical Islamic Attack on your front lawn?

And did you post it to Instagram?

 

[hamster]

And when was the last time there was an Radical Islamic Attack on your front lawn?

And did you post it to Instagram?

Sorry, not on Instagram.

However, a team of Bosnian chimney sweeps attacked the buildup of creosote on my flew last year.
"You're right, I've got nothing to worry about.".....Theo Van Gogh.

 

[Confluence]

Vantard,

This is not about anyone believing that you might be capable of winning some interweb argument. How shallow is your self esteem?

The reality is that many people, from many different nations, with many different social and/or religious outlooks feel threatened by the actions of radical Muslims AND there is corresponding evidence, regularly, to back up that fear.

The actions of the Danish government, and the Swedes, to increase safety for their people demonstrates that this is a real issue; not some quasi-intellectual debate about medieval christians and present day radical Muslims.

Perhaps there will be places in the world where new immigrants can quickly integrate into society and improve it for the benefit of all citizens (can you pick out one shining example of this from the past 150 years?).

But if not, governments or peoples will simply take actions that they feel necessary to defend themselves, regardless of your inane, self-imposed moral superiority argument.

Practical folks will use all tools available to solve the problems they perceive. Just like the 70 year old Israeli state does when pitted against threats from 1600 year old radicalized religious zealots who fight with them over silly rocks.

You can remain caught up in your theoretical, timeless debate, but it is useless and offensive in the face of the reality that so many people globally fear.

That makes you a dumbass.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

Vantard,

The epic levels of butthurt from you people is amazing. We're talking Tom Brady levels of crybaby.

This is not about anyone believing that you might be capable of winning some interweb argument. How shallow is your self esteem?

Again, why are crying like a *****. If you've got an argument to make, make it. Stop whining.

The reality is that many people, from many different nations, with many different social and/or religious outlooks feel threatened by the actions of radical Muslims AND there is corresponding evidence, regularly, to back up that fear.

But the discussion on this board is not limited to radicals, now is it. People are arguing that Islam is a Magical Evil Religion, completely different from all the rest. If the arguments were limited JUST to radicals, they would make more sense. Again, there are a BILLION GODDAMN MUSLIMS on the planet. A tiny percentage of them are militant radicals. And an even smaller number actually carry out violent acts. Acknowledge that fact, and the argument starts to make more sense.

The actions of the Danish government, and the Swedes, to increase safety for their people demonstrates that this is a real issue; not some quasi-intellectual debate about medieval christians and present day radical Muslims.

The problem isn't that they let Muslims into their country. The problem is they let 3rd world refugees into their country without properly integrating them into society. This was a logistical clusterfuck, not some cultural phenomenon.

Perhaps there will be places in the world where new immigrants can quickly integrate into society and improve it for the benefit of all citizens (can you pick out one shining example of this from the past 150 years?).

But if not, governments or peoples will simply take actions that they feel necessary to defend themselves, regardless of your inane, self-imposed moral superiority argument.

It's interesting that you're so hostile, but the Europeans themselves are not. American are bigots by nature. It's just our culture. Europeans are by and large much less prone to lapses of tribal rage because WW2 is still fresh in their minds. That war was fought on their shores. They're not anxious to repeat the sins of their fathers by falling into the hate trap. Americans, not so much.

Practical folks will use all tools available to solve the problems they perceive. Just like the 70 year old Israeli state does when pitted against threats from 1600 year old radicalized religious zealots who fight with them over silly rocks.

You can remain caught up in your theoretical, timeless debate, but it is useless and offensive in the face of the reality that so many people globally fear.

That makes you a dumbass.

It makes you a coward. I'm not scared. You are. Because you're nutless.

The problems with the Middle East and radicalism are solvable. You're afraid because you know you have no interest in solving them. You're more interested in satiating your prejudices than being pragmatic in your approach. And your hate makes you afraid because it blinds you from seeing any real solution. All bullies are ultimately cowards.

Spend your life being a scared *** ***** if you want to. Or you could grow balls and try to be part of the solution. It's up to you.

 

[oneforthebus]

Had a visit from my Finnish friend this weekend. Apparently Fins, some of the most leftwing, progressive socialists in the world, are up in arms about the influx of refugees. Refugee centers are being set up which according to her are not filled with women and children, but late teen and young adult men who seem to have a particular fascination with young blonde women. Fins are heavily taxed but get massive social welfare programs, which they resent having to share with 30,000 refugees. It's hilarious to see these so-called progressive countries like Finland, Denmark, Germany and Sweden who criticize us for not wanting to help these refugees but are now seeing the negative effects in their own countries and crying foul. Most of them are putting a stop to letting more in and have plans to deport a lot of them,.

Terrorists or not these people have a completely different culture, a lot of them are racist, sexist, violent savages,and people are starting to feel deceived and lied to about helping poor peaceful huddled masses of women and children.

 

[DBS1970]

Had a visit from my Finnish friend this weekend. Apparently Fins, some of the most leftwing, progressive socialists in the world, are up in arms about the influx of refugees. Refugee centers are being set up which according to her are not filled with women and children, but late teen and young adult men who seem to have a particular fascination with young blonde women. Fins are heavily taxed but get massive social welfare programs, which they resent having to share with 30,000 refugees. It's hilarious to see these so-called progressive countries like Finland, Denmark, Germany and Sweden who criticize us for not wanting to help these refugees but are now seeing the negative effects in their own countries and crying foul. Most of them are putting a stop to letting more in and have plans to deport a lot of them,.

Terrorists or not these people have a completely different culture, a lot of them are racist, sexist, violent savages,and people are starting to feel deceived and lied to about helping poor peaceful huddled masses of women and children.

What you mean I wasn't full of bull when I initially posted the "Refugees" weren't families but were overwhelmingly military aged men?

Hijarah

 

[Rod Farva]

The Zionists in Israel commit atrocities regularly. We get it. You're an anti semite. Moving on.....The Chinese commit atrocities regularly. "Chinese" is not disguised as a religion. The FARC and other rebel groups in Latin America commit atrocities regularly. "FARC" is not disguised as a religion. The Mexican drug cartels, which are bizarrely VERY religious, commit atrocities regularly. Neither "Mexican" nor drug dealing are disguised as a religion. The Burmese commit atrocities regularly. "Burmese" is not disguised as a religion.The Russian and Ukrainian militias commit atrocities regularly. "Russian and Ukrainian militias" are not disguised as a religion. Islam has absolutely NO monopoly on violence or heinous acts in the modern world. They are just a convenient scapegoat for American demagogues. Lots of people murder other people en mass for a wide variety of reasons. I don't think Dylan Roof's reasons for killing a bunch of people in a church are any more sound than Nidal Hasan's reasons for killing a bunch of my brothers and sisters at Fort Hood.

You're the one who seems to think that one senseless killing is somehow more or less justified than another based on the ideology of the killer. And I disagree.

You're changing the subject AGAIN.

You said ONE RELIGION has a monopoly on atrocities. That is PATENTLY FALSE. You're trying to create some great boogeyman to attack so you can justify your prejudice.




Aaaaaaaaaannnnnd I win.

Thank you for capitulating. It's nice to know you understand that you lost.

You "win"? Lmfao.......the only way you win is if you're playing yourself......are you playing with yourself?

.

But the discussion on this board is not limited to radicals, now is it. People are arguing that Islam is a Magical Evil Religion, completely different from all the rest. If the arguments were limited JUST to radicals, they would make more sense. Again, there are a BILLION GODDAMN MUSLIMS on the planet. A tiny percentage of them are militant radicals. And an even smaller number actually carry out violent acts. Acknowledge that fact, and the argument starts to make more sense.

I would never "acknowledge that 'fact'." Actually I've made the argument rightcheayah on this very board that islam isn't a religion at all. It is a totalitarian ideology that seeks to govern by subjugating everyone regardless of their beliefs. Regardless of the semantics of the situation I have also made the argument that if it is only the "tiny" fraction of muslims that are trying to "radicalize" it then where is the outcry from the vast majority of them? I mean after all there are a "BILLION GODDAMN MUSLIMS" in the world. I'm sure one could search and find a very, few very small and insignificant protestations but the fact is that they are a weak and infinitesimal part of this particular segment of society. It is my opinion that the vast, vast majority of muslims are content to ride this storm out and claim fealty to the eventual victor.....and make no mistake there will have to be an eventual victor. It's a win / win for the fence sitters. They already subscribe to the tenets of islam and see the shifting of their lives' paradigms slightly so as to make themselves "acceptable" to the caliphate as doable....



The problem isn't that they let Muslims into their country. The problem is they let 3rd world refugees into their country without properly integrating them into society. This was a logistical clusterfuck, not some cultural phenomenon.

You cannot force "integration." These " 3rd world refugees " , predominately fit, military aged men don't want to be "integrated" or assimilate. I firmly believe that this world wide infiltration is step one of the latest muslim plan to establish the caliphate by entering countries and establishing sizeable populations that will out-breed native or historically predominate cultures.



It's interesting that you're so hostile, but the Europeans themselves are not. American are bigots by nature. It's just our culture. Europeans are by and large much less prone to lapses of tribal rage because WW2 is still fresh in their minds. That war was fought on their shores. They're not anxious to repeat the sins of their fathers by falling into the hate trap. Americans, not so much.

Europeans and European governments aren't the same thing. Europeans are becoming more "hostile" by the day as they are beginning to see the results and negative impacts of the decisions of their multicultural, PC governments.



It makes you a coward. I'm not scared. You are. Because you're nutless.

The problems with the Middle East and radicalism are solvable. You're afraid because you know you have no interest in solving them. You're more interested in satiating your prejudices than being pragmatic in your approach. And your hate makes you afraid because it blinds you from seeing any real solution. All bullies are ultimately cowards.

Spend your life being a scared *** ***** if you want to. Or you could grow balls and try to be part of the solution. It's up to you.

And there it is. You don't agree with me you must be a ***** or something. Careful man, you're losing it.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

You're changing the subject AGAIN.

You said ONE RELIGION has a monopoly on atrocities. That is PATENTLY FALSE. You're trying to create some great boogeyman to attack so you can justify your prejudice.

Oh you win...the award for being the board's most annoying poster. Good Lord, even Tibs at times capitulates to a degree. Yet you, on one single page, look like a drunken fool who can't remember what he's said, who gets owned by the other posters, then claims victory. It's like watching the Special Olympics.

Let's recap for our viewers shall we?

Hamster said specifically - "I will never defend any atrocity that is done in the name of any religion. One religion seems to have a monopoly on it today."

Now Steel, I want you to pay very close attention to detail this time, ok, but his choice of words are very very important? Eyes and ears to the chalkboard now: He said one religion (obviously and clearly meaning Islam) seems to have a monopoly on atrocity done in the name of religion...[drum roll]...today.

Your reply to him introduced the Burmese (note Hamster did not. This is pertinent later). Your reply also falsely introduced the "Zionist Israelis" as an example of another religion committing atrocities in the name of religion. Those "atrocities" (I like to call them self defense) aren't committed in the name of religion. This is the error you continue to commit over and over in these threads, introducing Israel as comparable to Islam. It's not, not in the least, and you'll lose that argument 10 times out of 10. They happen to be Jewish, but Judaism isn't teaching them to go kill their enemies.

You listed half a dozen other examples of groups/countries committing atrocities, but none of them are doing it in the name of religion. They are doing it in the name of drugs, land, oppression. Islam is doing all of this because their God teaches them to do so. This is a fundamental point you refuse to learn.

Your statement after those examples was this gem: "Islam has absolutely NO monopoly on violence or heinous acts in the modern world."

Speaking of changing the subject man. Your statement is correct, Islam doesn't have a monopoly on violence in the modern world. But that isn't what Hamster said, now was it? He said it's the only "religion" that does. You now get the comedy in this correct? You rebut using completely different points and tenets for your argument - comparing countries, organizations and yes some religions erroneously (that are not acting because their religion told them to) to Islam. You just skirted Hamster's valid, accurate point. You side stepped it and changed the basis for the discussion.

So let the evidence stand for the court, that Steel Vanguard changed the subject. Not the other way around.

Now for the Burmese...

You introduced the Burmese, originally. Hamster challenged your introduction of the Burmese as evidence. This is a valid, linear extension to a discussion. You introduced the concept, he challenged your facts around the concept, and then boom...in Special Olympics style...you call him out for changing the subject. I mean, seriously...WTF man LOL. One can only shake their damned heads at this "Clown Car" episode you put forward all over page 9 of this thread.

Making this most comical is your claim of victory.

I'll give you this, you are entertaining in that sort of lap dog kind of way.

 

[Confluence]

I'll give you this, you are entertaining in that sort of lap dog kind of way.

 

[Spike]

The Dems world is crumbling


Bill Maher: I Wish Liberals Would Have Same Intolerance For Muslims That They Do For Christians

"Liberals have to stop insisting that the world is the way they want it to be instead of the way it is," Maher said.

"After the San Bernardino attacks... I heard all over the TV, everybody was saying, 'If only Americans knew more about Islam they wouldn't be so afraid.' Actually, it's the reverse," Maher said.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...s_at_home.html

 

[deljzc]

I'm keeping this for use later:

'If only Americans knew more about Islam they wouldn't be so afraid.' Actually, it's the reverse," Maher said.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Maher is at least consistent. He hates religious people no matter what side they're on.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

I keep telling yinz that Italy doesn't have much of a Muzzie problem. This is why:

https://www.facebook.com/238696516197018/videos/1052875418112453/?video_source=pages_finch_trailer

 

[Ron Burgundy]

And Russia.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/r...p-in-hospital-the-next-morning/#ixzz3zRwYflbj

A group of 51 refugees were brutally assaulted outside a night club in Murmansk, Russia, after they groped and molested women at a night club Saturday.
The refugees had previously been ordered to leave Norway for “bad behavior” and tried their luck in Russia. What they didn’t realize when they went out clubbing in Murmansk is that Russians have less tolerance when it comes to sexual assault on local women than other European countries.
The refugees allegedly groped and harassed women in a similar manner as the assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A group of male Russian took them aside to “educate” them that “Cologne is 2,500 kilometers south of here.” (RELATED: Cologne Prepares For More Sexual Assaults During Carnival This Week)
The refugees tried to flee but were quickly captured by the Russians. They then took them out to the street and gave them a beating they will remember. Police arrived to break up the fight but locals report that they threw a few punches at the refugees before arresting 33 of them. Eighteen refugees were in such bad condition they had to be take to the hospital.

 

[Rod Farva]

'bout time people start standing up to the skinnies. Entitled? America's leech class got nothin' on these savages.

 

[hamster]

 

[hamster]

 

[Spike]

Anti-Islam groups rally across Europe

A march by Germany's anti-Islamic organisation Pegida drew thousands to the eastern city of Dresden on Saturday on a day that saw rallies across Europe in support of the movement to protest against mass immigration and the "islamisation" of Europe.

Pegida supporters took to the streets of a number of other European cities, including Prague and the northern French port of Calais, home to the infamous "Jungle" refugee camp for migrants seeking passage across the Channel to Britain.

http://www.thelocal.de/20160206/anti-islam-groups-rally-across-europe

--------------------------------

It's amazing that other groups are allowed to advocate their own interests, except Whites and Christians. If they stand up for themselves they are immediately labeled as White supremacists, racists, Nazis, etc.

 

[Spike]

Rainbows!

Refugees among gang caught on video dancing, singing in Arabic as they rape unconscious teen

A couple of Iraqi asylum seekers are among a group of seven young men arrested after sickening video footage emerged in Belgium of an unconscious 17-year-old girl being gang-raped while the men danced around her, singing in Arabic.

Police say the girl was plied with vodka and doesn't remember what happened.

Four men and three boys between the ages of 14 and 25 were arrested -- two Belgians and five Iraqi immigrants, including the pair of recent refugees.

http://www.torontosun.com/2016/02/0...rabic-as-they-rape-unconscious-teen-says-cops