- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,648
- Reaction score
- 2,585
- Points
- 113
It's important to bring this to light and help supports this cause ANY way we can, regardless of how you identify yourself.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/12/inside-the-beltway-libertarians-take-on-presidenti/
Enough, already. The Libertarian Party is fed up with its ongoing exclusion from officially sanctioned presidential debates and the national broadcast exposure which comes with them. The party has already organized a public petition of protest and now plans a lawsuit against the “duopoly” of Republican and Democratic candidates who have a guaranteed national forum — when alternative candidates do not.
“Most Americans have no idea that the official-sounding and acting Commission on Presidential Debates is, in reality, a private organization created by the Republican and Democrat Parties and funded by special interests whose goal is to protect the status quo,” the Libertarian Party says in its mission statement. “Thus, it is no surprise that the Debate Commission has adopted ‘rules’ that make it virtually impossible for independent or third-party candidates to ever participate in the all-important presidential debates.”
The rules? To qualify, candidates must garner at least 15 percent of national voter support in national surveys — though the Libertarians say these surveys are “arbitrarily selected.” They also call this requirement “not only unfair, but illegal,” and contend that any candidate who is qualified to be president under the Constitution and has qualified for enough states’ ballots to receive at least 50 percent of Electoral College votes should be included.
SEE ALSO: Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Donald Trump top ‘can’t support’ lists in early primary states
“The legal challenge will maintain that the Commission on Presidential Debates, a private organization, formed by the chairs of the Democratic and Republican parties, unfairly and intentionally limits participation in the nationally-televised debates to the Democratic and Republican nominees — placing other national party nominees at a severe and unjust disadvantage,” notes Ron Nielson, an adviser to Our American Initiative, an interest group that is mounting the challenge and counts former Libertarian presidential hopeful Gary Johnson as its chairman.
“With polls showing that independent voters now constitute a majority of the American electorate, this duopoly simply isn’t fair — and must be changed,” Mr. Nielson says.
The ultimate goal is a chance on the mighty 2016 podium for the aforementioned Mr. Johnson and his former running mate Jim Gray, plus Green Party nominees Jill Stein and Cheri Honkala. The Libertarians are also taking their first public steps with the effort on Wednesday night, staging a two-hour Google-plus hangout at 9 p.m. ET to discuss the lawsuit, fundraising and future strategy. Find the hangout here
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/12/inside-the-beltway-libertarians-take-on-presidenti/
Enough, already. The Libertarian Party is fed up with its ongoing exclusion from officially sanctioned presidential debates and the national broadcast exposure which comes with them. The party has already organized a public petition of protest and now plans a lawsuit against the “duopoly” of Republican and Democratic candidates who have a guaranteed national forum — when alternative candidates do not.
“Most Americans have no idea that the official-sounding and acting Commission on Presidential Debates is, in reality, a private organization created by the Republican and Democrat Parties and funded by special interests whose goal is to protect the status quo,” the Libertarian Party says in its mission statement. “Thus, it is no surprise that the Debate Commission has adopted ‘rules’ that make it virtually impossible for independent or third-party candidates to ever participate in the all-important presidential debates.”
The rules? To qualify, candidates must garner at least 15 percent of national voter support in national surveys — though the Libertarians say these surveys are “arbitrarily selected.” They also call this requirement “not only unfair, but illegal,” and contend that any candidate who is qualified to be president under the Constitution and has qualified for enough states’ ballots to receive at least 50 percent of Electoral College votes should be included.
SEE ALSO: Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Donald Trump top ‘can’t support’ lists in early primary states
“The legal challenge will maintain that the Commission on Presidential Debates, a private organization, formed by the chairs of the Democratic and Republican parties, unfairly and intentionally limits participation in the nationally-televised debates to the Democratic and Republican nominees — placing other national party nominees at a severe and unjust disadvantage,” notes Ron Nielson, an adviser to Our American Initiative, an interest group that is mounting the challenge and counts former Libertarian presidential hopeful Gary Johnson as its chairman.
“With polls showing that independent voters now constitute a majority of the American electorate, this duopoly simply isn’t fair — and must be changed,” Mr. Nielson says.
The ultimate goal is a chance on the mighty 2016 podium for the aforementioned Mr. Johnson and his former running mate Jim Gray, plus Green Party nominees Jill Stein and Cheri Honkala. The Libertarians are also taking their first public steps with the effort on Wednesday night, staging a two-hour Google-plus hangout at 9 p.m. ET to discuss the lawsuit, fundraising and future strategy. Find the hangout here
