cucksayswhat
The Epstein Problem
- Thread starter hamster
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,637
- Reaction score
- 6,282
- Points
- 113
Fake news and democrats are talking nonstop about Epstein simply because they are panicked about all the proof that Tulsi just released. Where was all of their outrage about the files while Autopen was President? It didn't exist because they don't care. They are using this to distract from Russiagate.
You've been driven to nonsensical replies. Gibberish. I get it. Every arrow fired at Trump has missed.
And now the tables have turned, and the sights are set on Obama and your party.
It's frustrating, I'm sure.
that was a question for you.Good question, what do you say?
when presented unbiased evidence from a source you have long championed as being truthful and right, when that unbiased evidence goes against what you've long held as fact, you then attempt to shoot the messenger.
par for the course.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,566
- Reaction score
- 9,134
- Points
- 113
Both Parties are feeling the heat from their constituents. I've reached out to my elected officials, let's burn this shitshow ring of pedos to the ground.
A U.S. District judge in Florida has denied a request to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein case made last week by President Donald Trump's administration, the New York Times reports.
The denial came amid calls from both parties that the files related to the accusations surrounding the late Epstein, especially in light of recent reporting illuminating alleged ties Trump had with him.
Judge Robin L. Rosenberg wrote in a memo that the court's "hands are tied" because the transcripts were not requested in pursuit of a judicial hearing, according to the NYT report.
The transcripts will remain sealed under the law, according to the report, because Rosenberg says the government has not provided new evidence "that could predicate an investigation into uncharged third parties."
Attorney General Pam Bondi called for the unsealing following weeks of scrutiny surrounding the Epstein files.
Bondi previously said she had the file on her desk before calling for the testimony to be unsealed.
Epstein, a disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, died by suicide behind bars while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019, prompting some to allege coverup.
Trump, a long-time fixture on the New York social scene prior to his run in politics has been tied to Epstein multiple times, Newsweek previously reported.
Robin L Rosenberg, federal judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, on Wednesday denied the Department of Justice's request to unseal the transcripts of the grand jury in the Jeffrey Epstein probe.
An Obama appointee, Judge Rosenberg was giving her verdict on the DOJ's request last week that the transcripts of the grand jury be unsealed over the "extensive public interest" on the matter and for maintaining "transparency to the American public."
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,755
- Reaction score
- 6,252
- Points
- 113
Uh, no they’ve been talking nonstop since Elon said he was in the files, and then Trump failed to prove him wrong by releasing them, and then said they didn’t exist and we should forget about them, and then saying they did exist, but were a hoax created by the democrats.
Like Elon said, it’s a shame Epstein didn’t realize it was a hoax before he killed himself.
Face it, you've been worshipping a pedophile.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,130
- Reaction score
- 7,120
- Points
- 113
The Dems have lost all credibility on this subject due to their complete willingness to ignore this during the Biden Presidential term. Them now getting all up in arms proves it is all just political theatre, and not honest.
What will be really funny is when it all is said and done, It shows no involvement by Trump and burns MANY Democrat supporters.
No, Autopen is the child molester, not Trump.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,637
- Reaction score
- 6,282
- Points
- 113
Fair enough, completely valid point on the dumb**s Democrats. But why not levy the same criticism on the GOP, bending over backwards to whitewash this, here and now in 2025? With Trump running his campaign on full disclosure and transparency on this issue?
It also doesn't address a sizeable portion of the MAGA base fuming over how Trump and Republicans are handling this.
Well. seeing how everyone is being fair about this, there's a much larger portion of the Dems fuming over how Trump is handling this.
Where were they say 3 years ago, the information was readily available then as well. Assuming that there is any information that is.
WTAF? Bondi is trying to get them released now. They were just blocked by an Obama appointee judge.
why did that judge block this? THAT is the new question.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,755
- Reaction score
- 6,252
- Points
- 113
Obama and Comey put him in the hoax Epstein file?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,755
- Reaction score
- 6,252
- Points
- 113
The grand jury testimony is not the files. The files that were on Bondi’s desk, before they didn’t exist but after Obama and Comey fabricated them but before we were told to forget about them.
This isn't a hoax, Epstein and Maxwell wouldn't have been convicted if there weren't any victims or perps.
The information that needs to be released is the evidence on why they were convicted.
I doubt that there is a "list", neatly guaranteeing that those listed are immediately arrested, tried and convicted, but there has to be incriminating evidence leading to locking them up. Release it and let the chips fall.
I find it hysterical (sad?) that there are some here believing that it can't possibly be their guy but it's obviously that other guy.
The powerful people involved in this don't necessarily have to be politicians, and it wouldn't surprise me if none are exposed with the release of this but are powerful people none the less. I'd wager that we're talking real money as opposed to a political office.
The information that needs to be released is the evidence on why they were convicted.
I doubt that there is a "list", neatly guaranteeing that those listed are immediately arrested, tried and convicted, but there has to be incriminating evidence leading to locking them up. Release it and let the chips fall.
I find it hysterical (sad?) that there are some here believing that it can't possibly be their guy but it's obviously that other guy.
The powerful people involved in this don't necessarily have to be politicians, and it wouldn't surprise me if none are exposed with the release of this but are powerful people none the less. I'd wager that we're talking real money as opposed to a political office.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,130
- Reaction score
- 7,120
- Points
- 113
I for one am not getting my panties in a twist over this because:
1. I don't know what is actually going on behind the scenes. Maybe, investigations are going on that we are not privy to and that cannot be released to the public at this point.
2. Nothing ever happens overnight or in a few weeks.
3. I find it hard to believe that Epstein would have been dumb enough to keep a detailed list that could fall into the wrong hands.
4. I have NEVER believed that Epstein was ever running this operation himself, more likely he was extremely compromised and was being used by one or more 3 letter agencies, or even another "intelligence" operation, Massad maybe?
5. By exposing the "list", that then makes it's usefulness null and void. You lose leverage against bad actors you are trying to use for your own purposes.
6. More likely this so-called "list" was more BS invented to feed to the public.
7. Since Democrats did nothing about this for years, it is likely just a big nothingburger
I am also willing to accept that that so-called "sizeable portion" of the MAGA base is a bunch of window licking partisan hacks, just as I believe the same regarding the Democrat base, as well as 100% of the Libertarian party supporters.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,637
- Reaction score
- 6,282
- Points
- 113
Whoa, now we're getting somewhere. After four hollow, navel-gazing years of Biden, and the incessant subterfuge, delays, and distractions by the current administration, looks like bipartisanship may be alive and well on the Hill. A most certainly surprising, and welcome, turn of events.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,130
- Reaction score
- 7,120
- Points
- 113
As I am not a lawyer, I can image there could be a few reasons for this, not just an agenda.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,637
- Reaction score
- 6,282
- Points
- 113
I don't think it's a simple list with names on it. Rather, perhaps it's dossiers containing compelling, tangible information linking Epstein/Maxwell's criminal activities to their clients. Which would go a long way in untangling years of sordid, depraved behavior by the ruling elites, on both sides of the political spectrum. I hope they throw the kitchen sink at them. Most importantly, the privacy of the underage girls involved in this must be protected at all cost. They have suffered enough.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,130
- Reaction score
- 7,120
- Points
- 113
I always laugh when I hear the term "Bipartisan" thrown around, because DC is a Uni-party