• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Biden Destroying Us"

I'm waiting for that glorious moment when somebody unplugs the teleprompter at the beginning of J'Biden's answer to pretty much any question whatsoever...
 
What kind of shithole American sides with and roots for Putin over the US President?
can you point out which shithole American is siding with and rootin' for Pootin', or is this merely more conjecture as you double-down on running protection for President Peepads and his remarkably proven ability of being unable to function without cue cards, DOCTOR Jill by his side and pre-edited questions that do not reveal his lack of brain function?
 
What's that old adage, a picture is worth a thousand words?

E4EdQZEVoAMkEj2


Macron: "Get your head out of your ***, you blubbering idiot!"

Peepads: "Look, Manuel, C'mon man, I just do what they tell me. I'm not really sure who 'they' even are but they need to change my diapers. Where are we again?"
 
What's that old adage, a picture is worth a thousand words?

E4EdQZEVoAMkEj2


Macron: "Get your head out of your ***, you blubbering idiot!"

Peepads: "Look, Manuel, C'mon man, I just do what they tell me. I'm not really sure who 'they' even are but they need to change my diapers. Where are we again?"
perfect opportunity for the libs to scream elder abuse and say Macron is a dementiaphobe
 


Not this particular person, but someone else who posted it on Fakebook said they got a 30 day suspension.

And now this:

E4FWsujVgAQ7N5C



Getting worse by the day.
 
******* twitter ********. I was suspended again for railing on a Chinese government spokesman, ******* ******* Lijian Zhou, and asking him how he finds the time to tweet given how busy he is with slave labor camps and genocide.

**** twitter.
 
******* twitter ********. I was suspended again for railing on a Chinese government spokesman, ******* ******* Lijian Zhou, and asking him how he finds the time to tweet given how busy he is with slave labor camps and genocide.

**** twitter.
Twitter who?
 
I'm waiting for that glorious moment when somebody unplugs the teleprompter at the beginning of J'Biden's answer to pretty much any question whatsoever...
I already know how that goes…

ahhh, ummm,…ahhh…. Com On Man
 
What's that old adage, a picture is worth a thousand words?

E4EdQZEVoAMkEj2


Macron: "Get your head out of your ***, you blubbering idiot!"

Peepads: "Look, Manuel, C'mon man, I just do what they tell me. I'm not really sure who 'they' even are but they need to change my diapers. Where are we again?"

you assume he actually knows his name. Did he wear a name badge for Joe?
 
That's why I called him "Manuel" instead of Emmanuel. But that might even be giving him too much credit.
 
Some things we learned about Beijing Joe from the G7:
Who is really leading this nation? Seriously, who wrote the flash cards, and who decides which reporters the stuttering imbecile can call on? Is it Susan Rice, or God forbid, "Dr. Jill"? Dr. Jill received exactly as many votes for President as did I, but in fairness, her command of the English language ... needs help. A part of her dissertation, the one that earned her the moniker "doctor" (but not doctor).

The needs of the student population are often undeserved [sic], resulting in a student drop-out rate of almost one third

Makes sense. If the needs of the student population are undeserved, then they should be ignored and the students should drop out. Is that your contention, "Dr." Jill? She goes on.

Today, the community college not only answers the needs of transfer students but has also emerged to address the needs of career education, vocational and technical education, contract training, and community services.

One of my pet peeves is misplacement of modifiers such as "only" and "not only." For example, "The cafeteria not only serves rice and beans, but also jello." The author presumably is underscoring the importance of the food choices, not the fact the cafeteria not only serves but ... cleans afterwards? The correct construction is, "The cafeteria serves not only rice and beans, but also jello."

"Dr." Jill, being a middling intellect, pretend "doctor" (unlike Dr. Jimmy, holder of a glorious juris doctorate), naturally errs in her sentence structure and places the modifier "not only" in the wrong place. She was attempting to say, "Today, the community college answers the needs not only of transfer students but has also emerged [sic] to address the needs of career education, vocational and technical education, contract training, and community services.

Additionally, "Dr." Jill engages in something called "broken parallelism" when she fails to use the same verb conjugation in both clauses - she uses the active tense "answers" but then follows up using a different conjugation known as "past perfect tense," i.e., "has also emerged." A simple example shows the stilted, non-grammatical tactic she employed - "We wanted to run, bike, jog, and sprinting." The verbs are of a different conjugation. I learned parallelism in 8th grade. "Dr." Jill apparently missed that year.

Dr. Jill goes on to write:

B.S. Hollinshead, president of a junior college in Pennsylvania, wrote that the junior college should be ‘a community college meeting community needs.’

You don't say. Hey, let me give it a crack: "Dr. Jimmy, eminent legal scholar, wrote that lawyers should be lawyering to has been meeting lawyering needs." Genius.

Let me put it this way - the materials I post on this forum are more well-supported and annotated than "Dr." Jill's Ed.D. dissertation, and with better grammar, spelling and punctuation than "Dr." Jill's dissertation.
 
Decaf, where are your updates on Beijing Joe's popularity? You know, the unfettered love Americans have for the doddering old man, akin to the affection grandkids show drunk grandpa at Thanksgiving dinner when he asks them to pull his finger?

Oh, maybe because this ...

Biden currently holds a job rating of 48% approve and 43% disapprove. This is down from his 54% approve and 41% disapprove rating in April. The president gets a positive rating from 86% of Democrats (down from 95%), 36% of independents (down from 47%), and 19% of Republicans (up from 11%). Prior Biden approval levels registered 51% in March and 54% in January.

 
Has Biden always displayed a short temper when confronted with an issue he wasn't prepared for? If not, I'm sure everyone on this board, including the leftists, realize it's a symptom of advancing dementia.

Defenders of Biden say he has always had a stutter, and it's cruel to criticize him for that, I agree, but the gaffes and unsuccessfully searching for words is not a stutter.

He's the leader of the free world, and many will put politics ahead of the survival of our country, solely because he isn't Trump. I hate to think the plan is to get him through 2 years just so Harris would be eligible to be at the helm for 10, but it wouldn't surprise me.

I've always believed the American people had control, through their vote, on the direction of the country, and now even that is in question. I don't understand how destroying this country and everything that it has stood for will benefit the majority.

Asking this question will be moot, I realize that, but how will Biden's policies make this county better for all Americans?
 
I don't understand how destroying this country and everything that it has stood for will benefit the majority.
I suppose there are 2 ways of looking at this.
1) if middle and lower class America can pay their bills, watch cable and get beer... Isn't that good for them? If their base needs are essentially met, they get to work 8-10 hours a day and go home to watch Oprah, aren't they better off? Loki from Avengers is the perfect liberal politician. "Why do you fight and scrape to try to improve your station when you are SO much happier simply serving?"

2) Your entire question is based on the idea that our "leaders" are in any way focused on benefiting the "majority". If American politics has taught us anything, indeed politics in general... leadership is absolutely not interested in the "majority". They are interested in winning a position, solidifying power and extracting every bit of money and control they can from that position for as long as they possibly can.
 
A month or 2 before the election I chose to move and protect everything I worked for all my life. I was beginning to think I may have errored in that decision, but looking at the Dow today, I made the right choice. President Potato Head just took a little longer than I anticipated.
 
Top