• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

CharlesDavenport said:
He's right about how the left demonizes rather than debates, but that's because they would get spanked in a debate on the merits of their positions. He's delusional thinking that the opportunity lost was to persuade people with the liberal positions. Those do not survive rigorous debate.
Click to expand...

6hxOCbR.png
ygC9xJ7.jpg


And when the dust settles after his reelection....

trump-obama-arrest-jail-treason.jpg
 
You really want to see Libs heads asplode

Prediction: Nikki Haley will be Trump's running mate in 2020



im-84190
 
Can't wait to vote for her in 2024. I really hope she runs.
 
I couldn't help but relate this meme to our present day presidential campaigns.

k19dMmM.jpg


Liz Warren now wants reparations for same sex couples and who knows what that dimwit Biden will say next.

r0yuIbc.jpg


Gotta give em some credit though, they don't give up easily.

33y580.jpg
 
The new press secretary is Melania's spokesperson, Stephanie Grisham. Easy on the eyes. Hopefully she'll be as tough with the Fake News vermin as Sarah was.

iu
 
more winning

Remember that "liberal boycott"?

lol


Chick-fil-A Named America’s Favorite Restaurant Chain — Again

Chick-fil-A has once again been named the top limited-service restaurant chain in the country, its fourth year in a row claiming the top spot on the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

The ACSI offers as strong of a pulse as one can get on the industry, as it’s based on the input of nearly 23,000 consumers.

That Chick-fil-A is a perennial favorite is no surprise. The chain, known for its customer service training, has had quite a year—generating more than $10.4 billion in sales and leapfrogging Taco Bell and Subway for the No. 3 spot in the industry, according to National’s Restaurant News.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicia...avorite-restaurant-chain--again/#4ac2f2fc4c91
 
let the record show that NOW there's a border crisis because Don Lemon cried.

 
Are we in a crisis according to the media? I can't keep track.
 
'I knew you'd win': Donald Trump praises Scott Morrison for 'tremendous' election win

Donald Trump introduced his daughter Ivanka to Prime Minister Scott Morrison at an exclusive dinner between US and Australian delegates ahead of the G20 summit in Japan.

The President of the United States met with the Australian Prime Minister at Osaka's Imperial Hotel on Thursday, where Mr Trump congratulated him on the May 18 election win.

'He didn't surprise me but he surprised a lot of other people,' Mr Trump said at the opening of a working dinner with the prime minister.

'See, I knew him. See, I said you're going to do very well, and he did, he did that.

'They called it an upset but I don't call it an upset ... I want to congratulate you very much, it was a fantastic thing.'

The meeting with Mr Morrison was the first Mr Trump held upon his arrival in Osaka

15332630-7188251-image-a-49_1561645140028.jpg


15332640-7188251-image-a-52_1561645226000.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ings-Ivanka-official-talks-Australia-G20.html
 
TRUMP WINS AGAIN!



DEMOCRATS VOTE FOR MORE CONCENTRATION CAMPS



WASHINGTON — Speaker Nancy Pelosi agreed on Thursday to clear the Senate’s version of emergency humanitarian aid package for strapped federal agencies dealing with a migrant crisis, jettisoning the House’s strict controls on the $4.6 billion in a stinging defeat that was ensured by Democratic disunity.

The change was a striking display of disarray and an unusual setback for Ms. Pelosi, who has been adept at navigating the political complexities of a caucus riven with powerful progressive and moderate factions that often work at cross purposes. On Thursday, their priorities clashed in spectacular fashion, and the speaker — who had put her reputation on the line, calling herself a “lioness” out to protect children as she held out for stronger protections in migrant facilities that house them — had to accept defeat.

“In order to get resources to the children fastest, we will reluctantly pass the Senate bill,” Ms. Pelosi said in a letter to Democratic lawmakers

B973A4Sl.png


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/border-funding-immigration.html
 
Spike said:
DEMOCRATS VOTE FOR MORE CONCENTRATION CAMPS
Click to expand...

I knew they closed and fenced off all those Walmarts in the south last year for a reason.

Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
 
Boom.

https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/all-that-and-a-bag-of-mail-72/

“Why do athletes (Megan Rapinoe most recently) continue to refuse to visit the White House? If they really have issues with the Pres, wouldn’t visiting allow them the opportunity to speak to him and speak their concern to him in person?”

This is one of my biggest issues with our current political environment — if you engage with the other side it’s somehow seen as an awful thing to be willing to do.

If Megan Rapinoe truly disagrees with Donald Trump on a bevy of political issues, wouldn’t it make sense for her to request a meeting with him and make the case on the decisions he’s made that she disagrees with? I think so.

Think about this from a historical perspective, the reason Martin Luther King, Jr. marched was to get a seat at the political table with a president so civil rights laws could be changed. Even if, potentially, that president disagreed with his political goals, getting a meeting was a MASSIVE deal, the entire reason for the protest. The goal was to get in the room and by getting in the room to be able to effectuate change.

Nowadays it seems like people want to protest just to bring attention to themselves rather than engage in constructive dialogue and bring about change.

Why is that?

First, because I think most of what is being protested today isn’t actually that impactful — things are pretty dman good in America today even if people want to argue otherwise and second, and I think more substantially — because once you sit down with someone you disagree with you have to acknowledge their common humanity and you might end up liking them, even if you disagree with their politics.
That’s why I defended Joe Biden for pointing out that working with people you disagree with on many issues is a big part of political success. What Biden was illustrating in talking about his work with the segregationist senators was that even though he disagreed with their politics then, he might still be able to make common ground with them elsewhere.

That’s what normal humans do.

We don’t all agree on everything, but we also don’t all disagree on everything either.

For instance, Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are very dissimilar on many issues, but they agree that America needs an aggressive response on China. Just because Bernie disagreed with Trump on taxes, does that mean he shouldn’t try and work with Trump on Chinese trade if that were possible?

It’s also possible that by interacting with someone you might help them to change their minds. Look at Robert Byrd, the former Democratic senator from West Virginia. He was a KKK member in his early political career, but by the end of his career he was a voice for civil rights. People are complicated and sometimes we’re wrong about issues or our opinions evolve. How does that happen? Frequently by interacting with people we choose to spend time with.

You don’t get people to agree with you by calling them awful, vile names, you do it by the power of persuasion.

I don’t consider it a badge of honor to attempt to silence someone I disagree with. Now, I want to win the debate with someone I disagree with on issues that matter to me, but I’m not a guy who runs and hides from people with different political persuasions. For instance, I’d welcome Jemele Hill on my new Wins and Losses podcast and let her argue for what she believes in without feeling like that somehow devalues what I believe in.

I think Trump would probably meet with Megan Rapinoe and other members of the US women’s soccer team and listen to their concerns. Would his opinions change? Maybe, maybe not. There is certainly evidence with Kim Kardashian that Trump has been open to famous people convincing him to undertake an action he otherwise might not have undertaken. But no matter what the result would be, I suspect Rapinoe and her teammates would have to acknowledge Trump isn’t Hitler once they met him in person.

And that’s ultimately why they don’t want to meet him.

Because they’d rather believe in Donald Trump as a Nazi boogeyman because it confirms their world view is all correct and his is all wrong.

That’s what this current cancel culture is all about — if you want to cancel someone’s opinions or someone’s audience what you’re really arguing is they don’t deserve to be heard by anyone. Which is, you know, what totalitarian dictators do.

The truth of the matter, whether people believe it or not, is that most complicated issues in this country are complicated because there aren’t easy answers. If there were easy answers there wouldn’t be good arguments on multiple sides and we’d have fixed those issues long ago.
Click to expand...
 
hamster said:
Click to expand...


And how about this, Hamster? You know how anguished Tibs was over the Supreme Court decision on drawing political districts and possible gerrymandering? Hey, take a look at 'ol Nadler's district:

lossless-page1-1200px-New_York_US_Congressional_District_10_%28since_2013%29.tif.png


Ohhh, no gerrymandering there, right? Tibs will be right along to demand that Nadler lose his seat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top