So what to make of ambassador Sondland? I found his opening statement interesting.
I've got a semi-serious question for you guys, not sure if that's even possible on this board. How many foreign service members, diplomats, military advisors and the like do any of you know personally, or have even met, at some point in your lives? You know, people who've spent the past ten, twenty, thirty years representing our country, pursuing American foreign policy abroad.
If you've had any experience with these folks, you'd know the term 'Never Trumper' simply doesn't exist within these ranks. These people have served under Republican and Democratic presidents alike. There actually exists such a thing called American foreign policy. It doesn't blow in the wind, doesn't change every four years there's a new president. This has been formulated over decades, based on military and foreign service experience, particularly post-WWII and then following the Cold War. The basic premise is that to best serve American national interests, democracy is good, transparency is good, the free market is good, applicable all around the world.
To have a President, whomever it may be, disparage, attack, smear and slander career foreign service members is beyond reprehensible. And you would agree with that sentiment, if you've ever met any of these fine folks.
There is a hyper-partisanship currently in America that is dangerous and teetering on the brink of being out of control. I'm starting to agree with Sarge, that we may be slowly but surely entering the point of no return.
Well, he actually has his **** together. He has documents and emails detailing conversations and such. Very credible is how I would describe him to this point.
Can't watch anything at the moment, but I do see a President Pelosi trending on Twitter. I've seen that before, but sounds like his testimony is pretty damaging?
Can't watch anything at the moment, but I do see a President Pelosi trending on Twitter. I've seen that before, but sounds like his testimony is pretty damaging?
I don't know how damaging. I just felt like Sondland was telling the truth. He was able to back up most of what he said with dates, times, e-mails and the people involved. He was very matter of fact. Far more credible than the people they trotted up there giving opinion with no facts.
I still don't think it makes a difference. Trump was always going to be impeached. If I were a betting man, I would bet the articles of impeachment are already written. That said, who knows where this goes in the Senate. Pretty sure Romney isn't voting acquittal, and the rest of the Senate Republicans are so wishy washy, who knows what happens there.
But as I said, Sondland was at least credible.
I’m sooo doing this. Wait, I’m married with kid....I haven’t had cash on my since who knows.
I’m sooo doing this. Wait, I’m married with kid....I haven’t had cash on my since who knows.
Things are so hyper-political right now, I'm just going to watch the chips fall where they may, hope that all laws are followed appropriately and that they can all get back to the business of Governing already.
*How naive of me*
2:22 P.M. — Meadows points to Turner’s questioning as “game over” for the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry:
Wow.@RepMikeTurner: "Mr. Sondland, let's be clear: no one on this planet—not Donald Trump, Rudy Guiliani, Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo—no one told you aid was tied to political investigations, is that correct."
Gordon Sondland: "That's correct."
Game over.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 20, 2019