• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

there were never, at any point in time whatsoever,WMDs in Iraq...

Superman

You may worship me
Moderator
Forefather
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
22,429
Reaction score
27,550
Points
113
Location
Trampa, FL
or, we can logically conclude that Iraq is the only place in the entire mid-eastern region where there are not any WMDs ever.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/08/394...l&utm_content=entry-meta&utm_campaign=Sharing

This Chilling Image Proves Something Disturbing About What ISIS is Now Capable Of

As ISIS continues to wreak havoc in the Middle East, they’re now employing a much more disturbing tactic to fight their jihad.

The tactic that they have decided on to create further carnage is to use mustard gas.

Rudaw reports:

Test on Friday proved that ISIS has used mustard gas against Kurdish forces over the last two days on the Gwer- Makhmur front, the area’s commander told Rudaw.

“The result of the test revealed they [ISIS] has used mustard gas,” Brigadier General Sirwan Barzani, commanding officer of the infantry division in the area said Friday.

US-based CNN quoted experts as speculating the gas came from old chemical weapons caches in Iraq or Syria that the US was unaware of.
While ISIS has used chlorine gas in previous attacks, this is the first time they have reportedly deployed mustard gas on the battlefield.

If the weapons came from Iraq, it could put the narrative that there were no WMDs in Iraq back on the table.
 
US-based CNN quoted experts as speculating the gas came from old chemical weapons caches in Iraq or Syria that the US was unaware of

NO WAY!!!

I've stated a couple of times that there are some undisputed facts about WMD in Iraq:

1. Iraq had WMD's at one point as they used them on the kurds;
2. After Iraq invaded Kuwait and the coalition forced them out, part of the deal of not taking out Sadaam then was weapons inspectors and destruction of remaining WMD's. No proof has been found that all of the WMD's were destroyed nor have any investigators said they found evidence of such.
 
They could find a cache of nukes in Saddam's old basement and libs would still say Bush lied.
 
This ***** for the birds. Wish Reagan was still in office. Even from a coffin they'd have more to fear of us than they do now.

Thank you to all the free load loving democratic ***** that gave us BarryO. At least Carter can die knowing he's not the worst POTUS ever.
 
They could find a cache of nukes in Saddam's old basement and libs would still say Bush lied.
and people died
please don't minimize the statement.
 
NO WAY!!!

I've stated a couple of times that there are some undisputed facts about WMD in Iraq:

1. Iraq had WMD's at one point as they used them on the kurds;
2. After Iraq invaded Kuwait and the coalition forced them out, part of the deal of not taking out Sadaam then was weapons inspectors and destruction of remaining WMD's. No proof has been found that all of the WMD's were destroyed nor have any investigators said they found evidence of such.
You're all racists and hating on The First Black President.
 
My favorite part of the whole WMD's in Iraq thing was that as soon as the bombs started dropping on Baghdad, Mommar Khadafi popped up and said "hey guys, I have all these WMD's and you can have 'em"...

hmmm...international intelligence all had those weapons in Iraq...but none in Lybia... bombs start dropping and all of a sudden Lybia has a huge stockpile of WMD's...
 
The justification for war, was that they had WMD that could harm Americans. The implied
weapon they were developing was nuclear. They said they had centrifuges and were getting yellow cake
uranium.
 
The justification for war, was that they had WMD that could harm Americans. The implied
weapon they were developing was nuclear. They said they had centrifuges and were getting yellow cake
uranium.

Actually, the justification was mostly that Saddam Hussein was refusing to allow inspectors in and had violated more than a dozen UN resolutions demanding he comply. Biological and chemical weapons were the focus of the demands for inspections, given that Saddam had used them both in the past. There were also some intelligence reports that Iraq was attempting to acquire uranium from Niger. Nobody in the Bush administration ever claimed that Iraq had nuclear weapons or were in the process of developing them, they only raised the specter of the possibility if action wasn't taken, given Saddam's refusal to cooperate with international demands.
 
Actually, the justification was mostly that Saddam Hussein was refusing to allow inspectors in and had violated more than a dozen UN resolutions demanding he comply. Biological and chemical weapons were the focus of the demands for inspections, given that Saddam had used them both in the past. There were also some intelligence reports that Iraq was attempting to acquire uranium from Niger. Nobody in the Bush administration ever claimed that Iraq had nuclear weapons or were in the process of developing them, they only raised the specter of the possibility if action wasn't taken, given Saddam's refusal to cooperate with international demands.

Kind of like what the Iranians are doing under Barry's miracle treaty.
 
The justification for war, was that they had WMD that could harm Americans. The implied
weapon they were developing was nuclear. They said they had centrifuges and were getting yellow cake
uranium.

Oh,okay, so now libs admit that yeah, there were wmd's there and they had plenty of time to move them........BUT now want to equivocate over the KIND of wmd's.....I'm shocked.
 
Saddam was a tyrant who needed killed... Bush was a buffoon who allowed the whole process to be politicized and run by corporate whims. There should have been a battle plan and an ironclad expedited exit strategy. We should have stayed away from the oil and had a prepackaged infrastructure ready to go the minute victory was claimed. that would have solidified goodwill there... what we did, as usual was muck it up... let WMDs get to psycopaths, and made everyone hate us more... that's on both of those damned parties and their petty bickering and corrupt ways... I really wouldn't shed a tear if they all dropped dead tomorrow
 
Saddam was a tyrant who needed killed... Bush was a buffoon who allowed the whole process to be politicized and run by corporate whims. There should have been a battle plan and an ironclad expedited exit strategy. We should have stayed away from the oil and had a prepackaged infrastructure ready to go the minute victory was claimed. that would have solidified goodwill there... what we did, as usual was muck it up... let WMDs get to psycopaths, and made everyone hate us more... that's on both of those damned parties and their petty bickering and corrupt ways... I really wouldn't shed a tear if they all dropped dead tomorrow
Bush felt that he could build the first Arab Democracy. He miscalculated the sectarian animosity.
 
Top