That was great, a very solid bitchslap!
Trump - Make America Great Again!
- Thread starter IndySteel
- Start date
- Status
That was great, a very solid bitchslap!
- Insulted the parents of a fallen soldier.
- Either is clueless about geopolitics in Russia/ Ukraine or has some weird alliance with the despotic ruler of Russia, depending upon how you look at it.
- Says that if his daughter was sexually harassed at her work place, she should find a new line of work.
- Feuds with the very people he would need absolute support from, for his retarded and vague plans if he wins this election.
I guess it takes a real little ***** to throw a real solid ***** slap.
- Either is clueless about geopolitics in Russia/ Ukraine or has some weird alliance with the despotic ruler of Russia, depending upon how you look at it.
- Says that if his daughter was sexually harassed at her work place, she should find a new line of work.
- Feuds with the very people he would need absolute support from, for his retarded and vague plans if he wins this election.
I guess it takes a real little ***** to throw a real solid ***** slap.
Why punch them, when you can just abort them...........Hilary. Ya know. ..women's health and ****.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
The blood is on Obama/Hillary's hands
Benghazi car bomb kills 23, dozens more injured
CAIRO (AP) — A suicide car bomb attack in the eastern city of Benghazi targeting Libyan troops killed 23 people and wounded dozens of others Tuesday, a hospital official said.
The official said the wounded were still arriving at the hospital in the aftermath of the bombing in the al-Qawarsha district on the outskirts of the city, Libya's second largest. For the past two years, fighting has been raging in Benghazi between forces under the command of Brig. Gen. Khalifa Hifter and Islamic militias
http://www.newschannel5.com/news/national/terrorism/benghazi-car-bomb-kills-23-dozens-more-injured
Benghazi car bomb kills 23, dozens more injured
CAIRO (AP) — A suicide car bomb attack in the eastern city of Benghazi targeting Libyan troops killed 23 people and wounded dozens of others Tuesday, a hospital official said.
The official said the wounded were still arriving at the hospital in the aftermath of the bombing in the al-Qawarsha district on the outskirts of the city, Libya's second largest. For the past two years, fighting has been raging in Benghazi between forces under the command of Brig. Gen. Khalifa Hifter and Islamic militias
http://www.newschannel5.com/news/national/terrorism/benghazi-car-bomb-kills-23-dozens-more-injured
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
To fight Trump, journalists have dispensed with objectivity
Why are the rules of journalism being rewritten this election year?
My local newspaper, the Sonoma County Press-Democrat, is so clearly in the tank for Hillary Clinton that I no longer take pleasure in my morning read. Trump’s acceptance speech, for example, was covered on the front page with two stories: on the left a straight, albeit somewhat judgmental, account of the speech, and on the right a “fact check” that disputed every point made by the GOP nominee. Clinton’s speech was covered with three front page stories, with headlines describing her nomination as “historic,” “inspiring” and “trailblazing.” A relatively mild fact-checking piece was relegated to the back pages.
This transparent bias is a national phenomenon, infecting both print and television media to such an extent that it has become almost impossible to separate coverage of the Trump campaign from attempts to tear it down. The media has long been accused of having a liberal slant, but in this cycle journalists seem to have cast themselves as defenders of the republic against what they see as a major threat, and in playing this role they’ve lost the ability to assess events rationally.
To take a recent example: Trump said at a news conference that he hoped the Russians — who are accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee’s computers — would release the 30,000 emails previously erased by Clinton’s staff. The DNC went ballistic, claiming that Trump had asked the Russians to commit “espionage” against the United States. Aside from the fact that Trump was obviously joking, Clinton claims those emails, which were on her unauthorized server during her tenure as secretary of State, were about her yoga lessons and personal notes to her husband — so how would revealing them endanger “national security”? Yet the media reported this accusation uncritically. A New York Times piece by Maggie Haberman and Ashley Parker, ostensibly reporting Trump’s contention that he spoke in jest, nonetheless averred that “the Republican nominee basically urged Russia, an adversary, to conduct cyber-espionage against a former secretary of state.” Would it be a stretch to conclude from this description that the New York Times is a Trump adversary?
The DNC emails, published by Wikileaks, reveal a stunning level of collaboration between important media outlets and the Democrats. Former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz sought to silence NBC’s Mika Brzezinski, who had found fault with the DNC’s role in the primaries. The emails have headings like “This must stop.” Incredibly, NBC’s Chuck Todd agreed to act as a go-between, even arranging a call between Wasserman Schultz and Brzezinski. Which raises the question: Why was a major media figure taking his marching orders from the Democratic party chair — and how did this affect his network’s coverage of the Trump campaign?
The DNC emails also show that Politico reporter Kenneth Vogel sent his copy for a story on Clinton’s fundraising operation to the DNC’s national press secretary, Mark Paustenbach, prior to publication. Politico has since apologized, but Vogel has his defenders. The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple said Vogel’s “prepublication generosity” was meant to give “the people you’re writing about … the opportunity to rebut all relevant claims in a story.” One wonders if the Washington Post does this for the Trump campaign. Somehow I doubt it.
Since last summer, Politico has been vehemently anti-Trump, and it’s only getting more extreme. It’s run several stories linking Trump to Vladimir Putin: “Why Russia is Rejoicing Over Trump,” “GOP Gobsmacked by Trump’s Warm Embrace of Putin,” “Donald Trump Heaps More Praise on Vladimir Putin” — and dozens of similar articles. The gist of these pieces is that Trump’s stated desire to “get along with Putin,” and his comments on the costs imposed by our membership in NATO, mean that Trump is essentially an agent of a foreign power. A recent article by Katie Glueck on Trump’s hacking joke said that Trump “appeared to align himself with Russia over his Democratic opponent” — as if he were a kind of Manchurian candidate.
Of course, Politico is not alone in what was once called red-baiting. The Atlantic also weighed in with Jeffrey Goldberg’s “It’s Official: Hillary Clinton Is Running Against Vladimir Putin,” and a Franklin Foer story in Slate was headlined “The Real Winner of the RNC: Vladimir Putin.”
This coverage smacks of the sort of McCarthyism that we haven’t seen in this country since the most frigid years of the Cold War.
Any objective observer of the news media’s treatment of Trump can certainly conclude that reporters are taking a side in this election — and they don’t have to be wearing a button that says “I’m with her” for this to be readily apparent. The irony is that the media’s Trump bashing may wind up having the exact opposite of its intended effect.
Polls shows that journalism is one of the least respected professions in the country, and with Trump calling out media organizations for their bias, widespread slanted reporting is bound to reinforce this point — and to backfire. Trump’s campaign is throwing down the gauntlet to the political class. If journalists are seen as the mouthpiece of that class, they may soon find themselves covering Trump’s inauguration.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-raimondo-trump-media-bias-20160802-snap-story.html
Why are the rules of journalism being rewritten this election year?
My local newspaper, the Sonoma County Press-Democrat, is so clearly in the tank for Hillary Clinton that I no longer take pleasure in my morning read. Trump’s acceptance speech, for example, was covered on the front page with two stories: on the left a straight, albeit somewhat judgmental, account of the speech, and on the right a “fact check” that disputed every point made by the GOP nominee. Clinton’s speech was covered with three front page stories, with headlines describing her nomination as “historic,” “inspiring” and “trailblazing.” A relatively mild fact-checking piece was relegated to the back pages.
This transparent bias is a national phenomenon, infecting both print and television media to such an extent that it has become almost impossible to separate coverage of the Trump campaign from attempts to tear it down. The media has long been accused of having a liberal slant, but in this cycle journalists seem to have cast themselves as defenders of the republic against what they see as a major threat, and in playing this role they’ve lost the ability to assess events rationally.
To take a recent example: Trump said at a news conference that he hoped the Russians — who are accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee’s computers — would release the 30,000 emails previously erased by Clinton’s staff. The DNC went ballistic, claiming that Trump had asked the Russians to commit “espionage” against the United States. Aside from the fact that Trump was obviously joking, Clinton claims those emails, which were on her unauthorized server during her tenure as secretary of State, were about her yoga lessons and personal notes to her husband — so how would revealing them endanger “national security”? Yet the media reported this accusation uncritically. A New York Times piece by Maggie Haberman and Ashley Parker, ostensibly reporting Trump’s contention that he spoke in jest, nonetheless averred that “the Republican nominee basically urged Russia, an adversary, to conduct cyber-espionage against a former secretary of state.” Would it be a stretch to conclude from this description that the New York Times is a Trump adversary?
The DNC emails, published by Wikileaks, reveal a stunning level of collaboration between important media outlets and the Democrats. Former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz sought to silence NBC’s Mika Brzezinski, who had found fault with the DNC’s role in the primaries. The emails have headings like “This must stop.” Incredibly, NBC’s Chuck Todd agreed to act as a go-between, even arranging a call between Wasserman Schultz and Brzezinski. Which raises the question: Why was a major media figure taking his marching orders from the Democratic party chair — and how did this affect his network’s coverage of the Trump campaign?
The DNC emails also show that Politico reporter Kenneth Vogel sent his copy for a story on Clinton’s fundraising operation to the DNC’s national press secretary, Mark Paustenbach, prior to publication. Politico has since apologized, but Vogel has his defenders. The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple said Vogel’s “prepublication generosity” was meant to give “the people you’re writing about … the opportunity to rebut all relevant claims in a story.” One wonders if the Washington Post does this for the Trump campaign. Somehow I doubt it.
Since last summer, Politico has been vehemently anti-Trump, and it’s only getting more extreme. It’s run several stories linking Trump to Vladimir Putin: “Why Russia is Rejoicing Over Trump,” “GOP Gobsmacked by Trump’s Warm Embrace of Putin,” “Donald Trump Heaps More Praise on Vladimir Putin” — and dozens of similar articles. The gist of these pieces is that Trump’s stated desire to “get along with Putin,” and his comments on the costs imposed by our membership in NATO, mean that Trump is essentially an agent of a foreign power. A recent article by Katie Glueck on Trump’s hacking joke said that Trump “appeared to align himself with Russia over his Democratic opponent” — as if he were a kind of Manchurian candidate.
Of course, Politico is not alone in what was once called red-baiting. The Atlantic also weighed in with Jeffrey Goldberg’s “It’s Official: Hillary Clinton Is Running Against Vladimir Putin,” and a Franklin Foer story in Slate was headlined “The Real Winner of the RNC: Vladimir Putin.”
This coverage smacks of the sort of McCarthyism that we haven’t seen in this country since the most frigid years of the Cold War.
Any objective observer of the news media’s treatment of Trump can certainly conclude that reporters are taking a side in this election — and they don’t have to be wearing a button that says “I’m with her” for this to be readily apparent. The irony is that the media’s Trump bashing may wind up having the exact opposite of its intended effect.
Polls shows that journalism is one of the least respected professions in the country, and with Trump calling out media organizations for their bias, widespread slanted reporting is bound to reinforce this point — and to backfire. Trump’s campaign is throwing down the gauntlet to the political class. If journalists are seen as the mouthpiece of that class, they may soon find themselves covering Trump’s inauguration.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-raimondo-trump-media-bias-20160802-snap-story.html
Trump is starting to fall well behind again in the polls. He needs to focus on Hilldog and Odumma and leave everyone else alone. He does need Ryan and McCain in his corner, so he needs to just endorse them and be done with it. Stay focused, train a thousand times for the debates and beat Hillary in the debates. That is really his only chance to win right now. If he doesn't stay focused and slam Hilliary in the debates, he will lose.
All of the media, other than Fox (the best and fairest in my opinion) is attacking him left and right and propping Hillary up as much as they can. It is even more disgusting than what they did for Odumma. Plus, the Dem voting machine is almost unstoppable. They already have thousands and probably millions of dogs, cats, dead people, etc. signed up and ready to vote. That's how they do it. The Dems lie better than the GOP tells the truth.
All of the media, other than Fox (the best and fairest in my opinion) is attacking him left and right and propping Hillary up as much as they can. It is even more disgusting than what they did for Odumma. Plus, the Dem voting machine is almost unstoppable. They already have thousands and probably millions of dogs, cats, dead people, etc. signed up and ready to vote. That's how they do it. The Dems lie better than the GOP tells the truth.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
lol
Funny how that works huh Chuck . We only have to wait a couple days and the real story comes out. While I feel for any parent that loses a child, maybe it's not such a great idea for that parent to go into attack mode publicly for ideological or personal financial reasons.
Panic Mode: Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...nancially-benefits-pay-play-muslim-migration/
Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.
This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others have reported—that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America. On behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, Khizr Khan ripped into Donald Trump’s policies on immigration—specifically bashing his plan to bar Muslim migration from regions afflicted with rampant terrorism into America temporarily until the United States can figure out what’s going on.
Khan even brought out a pocket Constitution, claiming inaccurately that Trump’s plans were unconstitutional. That’s not true, as Congress has already granted such power to the president under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952—allowing the president to bar migration of any alien or class of aliens the president sees as a threat to the United States.
The media, along with Hillary Clinton and her supporters throughout the Democratic Party establishment, has pushed the line of attack against Trump for days. Now on Tuesday, President Barack Obama has said that Trump is “unfit” to serve as President over the matter. Even a group of anti-Trump congressional Republicans has gone after Trump on the matter.
But as Breitbart News and other new media have exposed Khan’s various deep political and legal connections to the Clintons—and to Muslim migration—the attack line has crumbled. Now, with Khan deleting his website in an apparent effort to hide his biographical information, the attack is falling apart even more.
What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.
oops....
are you talking about:
- the same dead soldier's dad who attacked Trump regarding the death of his son in a war continued by Hillary?
- the same dead soldier's dad whose son was killed by the same Muslim terrorists whom Trump does not want to allow into our country?
- the same dead soldier's dad who essentially sells American citizenship for $500k?
-Trump said about his daughter that he'd hope she'd not allow it to continue even if it meant changing jobs
-With the enormous amount of "PC" being established, even something as harmless as "you look nice today" can be considered sexual harassment. thanks, Bomma
-Trump seems to have a **** ton of support from people who have looked at the real issues. Peeing in a restroom is not a real issue. Thanks, again, Bomma
Liberals lie better than the GOP tells the truth. FACT!
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
NBC Caught Scrubbing Old Video of Andrea Mitchell Saying Juanita Broaddrick Is ‘Discredited’
NBC News has stealth edited a May 19 video of Clinton campaign correspondent Andrea Mitchell on Today denouncing Juanita Broaddrick’s sexual allegations against Bill Clinton as “a discredited and long-denied accusation” to merely being a “long-denied accusation.”
Mitchell’s original phrasing was flagged the day that it aired live on NBC by the MRC’s Kyle Drennen and he chronicled the network’s history concerning Broaddrick and Clinton.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...c-scrubbing-old-video-mitchell-saying-juanita
-------------------------
Corrupt national media, NBC protecting Bill the rapist? - can't have that become "news". The word was deleted probably because Broaderick threatened to sue.
NBC News has stealth edited a May 19 video of Clinton campaign correspondent Andrea Mitchell on Today denouncing Juanita Broaddrick’s sexual allegations against Bill Clinton as “a discredited and long-denied accusation” to merely being a “long-denied accusation.”
Mitchell’s original phrasing was flagged the day that it aired live on NBC by the MRC’s Kyle Drennen and he chronicled the network’s history concerning Broaddrick and Clinton.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...c-scrubbing-old-video-mitchell-saying-juanita
-------------------------
Corrupt national media, NBC protecting Bill the rapist? - can't have that become "news". The word was deleted probably because Broaderick threatened to sue.
An endorsement from this military dad is much better than one from terrorist Khan.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Another day, so much Trump news to get caught up on. There are so many fires burning at once, it's hard to keep up.
Trump Campaign Staff "Suicidal"
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/2/1556079/-Trump-Campaign-Staff-Suicidal?detail=facebook
CNBC reporter John Harwood, NBC News reporter Ali Vitali and CNN’s Dana Bash are all reporting major troubles tonight on the Trump campaign staff:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">longtime ally of Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager: "Manafort not challenging Trump anymore. Mailing it in. Staff suicidal."</p>— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/760633940151443457">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump campaign source, reacting to this, tells <a href="https://twitter.com/alivitali">@alivitali</a>, "It's all true" & "way worse than people realize." <a href="https://t.co/yrB6vJdXvl">https://t.co/yrB6vJdXvl</a></p>— Peter Alexander (@PeterAlexander) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/status/760647104578674688">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A source tells <a href="https://twitter.com/DanaBashCNN">@DanaBashCNN</a> that some Trump campaign staff are frustrated w/ candidate lately, "feel like they are wasting their time"</p>— Dianne Gallagher (@DianneG) <a href="https://twitter.com/DianneG/status/760654692913414145">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood">@JohnJHarwood</a> word on the street that several key staffers have resignation letters ready to go in the next 72 hours</p>— Backroom Politics (@BackroomPolitic) <a href="https://twitter.com/BackroomPolitic/status/760654819765944320">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just got off the phone with a top Trump donor and fundraiser. At wit's end. Expletive after expletive. Can't fathom what Trump is doing.</p>— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/760836733437038594">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Trump Campaign Staff "Suicidal"
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/2/1556079/-Trump-Campaign-Staff-Suicidal?detail=facebook
CNBC reporter John Harwood, NBC News reporter Ali Vitali and CNN’s Dana Bash are all reporting major troubles tonight on the Trump campaign staff:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">longtime ally of Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager: "Manafort not challenging Trump anymore. Mailing it in. Staff suicidal."</p>— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/760633940151443457">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump campaign source, reacting to this, tells <a href="https://twitter.com/alivitali">@alivitali</a>, "It's all true" & "way worse than people realize." <a href="https://t.co/yrB6vJdXvl">https://t.co/yrB6vJdXvl</a></p>— Peter Alexander (@PeterAlexander) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/status/760647104578674688">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A source tells <a href="https://twitter.com/DanaBashCNN">@DanaBashCNN</a> that some Trump campaign staff are frustrated w/ candidate lately, "feel like they are wasting their time"</p>— Dianne Gallagher (@DianneG) <a href="https://twitter.com/DianneG/status/760654692913414145">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood">@JohnJHarwood</a> word on the street that several key staffers have resignation letters ready to go in the next 72 hours</p>— Backroom Politics (@BackroomPolitic) <a href="https://twitter.com/BackroomPolitic/status/760654819765944320">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just got off the phone with a top Trump donor and fundraiser. At wit's end. Expletive after expletive. Can't fathom what Trump is doing.</p>— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/760836733437038594">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
And this is downright terrifying. If you're still supporting Trump, you really need to get your head examined.
Trump asked 3 times in an hour national security briefing why we can't just use nuclear weapons
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...an-t-just-use-nuclear-weapons?detail=facebook
<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Stunning. Trump asked 3 times in an hour national security meeting why we can't just use nuclear weapons<br><br>WATCH: <a href="https://t.co/viaFzW18vs">https://t.co/viaFzW18vs</a></p>— Jesse Lehrich (@JesseLehrich) <a href="https://twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/760806897524015105">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Trump asked 3 times in an hour national security briefing why we can't just use nuclear weapons
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...an-t-just-use-nuclear-weapons?detail=facebook
<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Stunning. Trump asked 3 times in an hour national security meeting why we can't just use nuclear weapons<br><br>WATCH: <a href="https://t.co/viaFzW18vs">https://t.co/viaFzW18vs</a></p>— Jesse Lehrich (@JesseLehrich) <a href="https://twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/760806897524015105">August 3, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Don't worry - the corrupt national will drag every bought and paid for "consultant" in the world to attack Trump - the lies of "responsible journalists" are being exposed every time they bring these flunkies on air.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
What was the answer? Did he repeat the question three times because nobody answered?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
Trump is getting rope a doped. His major weakness is he can not ignore anyone that slights him in anyway.
His responses tend to be name calling and belittling similar to the response of a 6th grader. The Kahns, Buffet,
Bloomberg, Obama, Kaine, Cuban, etc...
He isn't campaigning for President, he is basically in a quarrel with everyone that says anything about him.
His responses tend to be name calling and belittling similar to the response of a 6th grader. The Kahns, Buffet,
Bloomberg, Obama, Kaine, Cuban, etc...
He isn't campaigning for President, he is basically in a quarrel with everyone that says anything about him.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Someone patted him on the head and said "Now, now Donald, you can't just go around dropping nukes because someone insults you on twitter."
Trump stormed out of the room stamping his feet, screaming "Waaaahhh, why the **** are you people tellling me this now? Doesn't matter, when I'm the president I'll do what I want!"
Maybe Hungary will piss him off and he'll nuke the **** out of that place too.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Muslim terrorists murder priests in cold blood, while the lard core leftist American media pretend it never happened
Make no mistake it's a HOLY WAR
France: brutally dragging Christians and priest out of church while Muslim terrorist appeaser Hollande bashes Trump.
French riot police DRAG Christians out of church
The angry protests come just a day after Father Jacques Hamel, who had his throat slit by two depraved Islamic State fighters, was laid to rest in Rouen Cathedral on Tuesday.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...olic-priest-dragged-church-Sainte-Rita-France
Make no mistake it's a HOLY WAR
France: brutally dragging Christians and priest out of church while Muslim terrorist appeaser Hollande bashes Trump.
French riot police DRAG Christians out of church
The angry protests come just a day after Father Jacques Hamel, who had his throat slit by two depraved Islamic State fighters, was laid to rest in Rouen Cathedral on Tuesday.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...olic-priest-dragged-church-Sainte-Rita-France
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Sad, pathetic IndySteel chimes in. Is there ever a day you don't prove yourself to be the biggest dripping **** on this board? I don't recall there ever was. So congrats on keeping your streak alive. You're just like Trump. You too suffer from the horrendous small hands-small dick-big mouth syndrome. No wonder you jerk off to the guy each and every day.
- Status
